4 December 2009

The Copenhagen climate summit organised by the United Nation, it's about saving the planet, right?

WRONG.

We all know now the scientific data used as "evidence of anthropogenic climate change" was faked, made up, manipulated to provide the answers the political establishment wanted. The language of climate change was a givaway as was the self righteousness and assumption of moral sueriority among the climate change believers. Anthropogenic climate change was one of the gospels of the new religion of Science.

It was easy to persuade most people to go along with it, this stuff had been worked out by scientists and scientists are very clever people if a bit nerdy and not great drinking companions unless you like to talk in equations and numbers. Everyone knows scientists are clever, they told us so themselves. Few people questioned their cleverness because scientists are always right aren't they? They're scientists.

To the sceptic and contributors to this web page have to be fully paid up, card carrying members of the sceptical bastards club, it was clear at an early stage that the science involved in predicting climate change was the science of guesswork. The premise that weather patters can be changed by tiny variations in CO2 content measured in parts per million jusdt does not ring true to anybody who has spent time appreciating nature. Somebody like myself who has spent time hiking, camping or in other outdoor activities and who, as an engineer has a good understanding of mathematical principles must be aware that it is futile to try to drawn conclusions on something as complex as weathher patterns just from looking at one factor. We must consider all that is happening and that is a much bigger area of study than the science of climate change, constrained by its corporate and political bosses demand for fast, simple answers can possibly undertake.

So the first item on the Copenhagen agenda is money. The Great Technology Scam, exposed by Ian Thorpe driven by computers and the internet is losing momentum now. We have all wised up to the idea that we must invest in a new computer and upgrade all our software to run on it every three years if not more often. A lot of people are still using Windows XP or even Win 98 and these will do all the clever stuff quite well. iPods and games consoles are fads. The technology firms need a new profit driver and a set of customers less fickle than ordinary people. You should not be surprised to learn that Silicon Valley computer firms are gearing up to get into the climate change technology market.

Climate change technology, now there's a phrase that shouts SCAM. If we are serious about reducing our carbon emissions we need only all make an effort to use less energy. So less technology rather than more would be a great place to start from.

The second item on the agenda is power. Way back in April 2009 when a reporter asked some delegates at the G20 economic summit if their next task was to create a global financial system one of the delegates let the cat out of the bag when he said, "Our task is to create a global culture. That was the first time the imposition of a New World Order had been hinted at. Since then members of the Obama administration, European leaders, directors of international banks and the newly appointed (get that, appointed not elected) President of the European Union have all spoken of Copenhagen being an opportunity to move towards a system of global governance that will be necessary to save the planet.

So there you have the idea that is driving the Copenhagen agenda. A global government and a New Word Order. On top of that, a walloping carbon tax, officially because it is needed to finance the technology, the untested and in most cases as yet uninvented technology that the scientists, those very clever people who, if their calculations do not give the required answer just change the numbers until they do work out, are so sure will reverse the factors causing climate change. We must not argue with the priests of the Church Of Science of course nor must we point out that although they say their science is proved beyond dispute that is a long way from the truth. The politicians are prepared to accept that scientists are speaking the truth simply because the scientists are telling them what they want to hear.

For several years now governments have been spreading fear and panic to sften us up for swingeing taxes and loss of freedom. Well you can't plan for a New World Order modelled on Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Third Reich, Mao's China or George Orwell's Big Brother state overnight. There have been many factors involved in preparing for the global government. The celebrity culture has been promoted and used to distract us with sensationalism from the attacks of freedom, the terrorist threat has been inflated out of all proportion to the actual risk to our communities posed by a handful of half mad fanatics. The debt culture has given us a taste of good living before that was snatched away by the carefully crafted economic collapse and now we are teased with a prospect of returning to those good times if only we will give up personal freedoms and understand that we must never question authority. And finally the digital media has persuaded us the internet, they cybersphere is the "place" where we can truly be free. This is the most insane and dangerous myth of all. Does anyone think their e-mails or postings are in any way private, does anybody believe governments do not exploit the ability to control information that the internet gives them?

Publish an article or pamphlet critical of government and it is very hard for the authorities to suppress the information or destroy all copies. Publish an article on the Internet and it is truly very easy using a script of only a few dozen lines of code to scrub it. Look at what happened in the 2008 election campaign. Team Obama, funded by an apparently bottomless well of cash most of which came from very dubious sources, and with the help of hundreds of highly motivated volunteers were able to scrub the net of most material linking the candidate to a number of political and financial scandals and a few serious crimes. The one issue that did gain traction and is still rolling was the issue of Obama's parentage and elegibility. If his claim that his father was Kenyan is true he was not elegible to run for President. That is defined in the US Consitution, a document that cannot easily be concealed or destroyed, unlike the digital media.

There is the real agenda for Copenhagen then, power, money, global governance and authoritarian social control. People may call me a conspiracy theorist and to be hionest I rather like that. but just because something looks, feels, sounds and smells like a conspiracy you should not assume it is not happening.

RELATED POSTS:

RELATED POSTS:
It's Getting Weirder On Planet Guardian
Authoritaianism Of Box Ticking
Madness Gone Politically Correct
Evolution Lessons In Junior School
Ten 4 Ten
Ten 4 Ten - a major new work of poetry
A Roundup Of All Our Climate Change Posts
Climate Change: Is Science To Blame
Copenhagen Climate Change Lies
Electric Cars - Mini Advnture In Futility New Puma Electric Car Is Not What It Sounds Like Electric Cars - Not Cheap At Half The Price Climate Science Scam Exposed
Has Global Warming Stopped
Blinding Themselves With Science
Fear and panic and fossil fuels"
Too Complex For Science
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Copenhagen Climate Change Stink Of Corruption Brown: A Lust For Glory
Climate Change Killed A Guardian Reader
Climate Science Scam Exposed
Has Global Warming Stopped
Blinding Themselves With Science
Fear and panic and fossil fuels"
Too Complex For Science
Novus Ordo Seclorum
An Inconvenient Truth About Climate Change Science
Why Copenhagen Will Fail
Climate Change Science Scam
Climate Change Deniers Deny Nothing
Government By Fear And Panic
Obama's Climate Change Bill
Renewable Energy Con
V2G: Technology You Can't Believe In
Too Many People
We Need Nuclear Power
Feel The Burn
Nature Does Not Negotiate
Wind Of Change
An Inconvenient Truth About Climate Change The Climate Change Whitewash
Climate Change Fatigue: Science Of Fear And Panic Lost The Argument
Copenhagen: The Real Agenda Peccavimus
The Offcomer
The Climate Change Whitewash
Climate Change Fatigue: Science Of Fear And Panic Lost The Argument
Ten 4 Ten
Giving Up On Work
BBC Weathermen To Be Sacked?