As the situation in Ukraine gets more desperate with casualty numberrs mounting, half the national infrastructure in ruins and Russia upping its game in response to US / NATO military assistance privided to the neo nazi nutters in Kiev, a false flag event seems the only way to provide an excuse for direct US intervention. And the USA has a track record for fgalse flag events ...

 by Egbert Nohbakkon, 25 October 2022

Picture source: redcarpetsystems.com

The Russian Foreign Ministry went public last week with an astounding claim that the government of Ukraine is in the 'final stage' of building a 'dirty bomb'. Despite a flurry of warning from Russian diplomats and defence officials western leaders were quick to dismiss the warning and claim that Moscow is planning and will carry out a false flag attack using a nuclear device.

The claim came as Kyiv's top general admitted President Volodymyr Zelensky's office is 'worried' about the threat posed by Vladimir Putin's nuclear weapons.While war coverage in mainstream media sugggests Moscow may resort to such desperate tactics because they are losing the war, well informed sources ignored by corporate publishers and broadcasters paint a very different picture of what is happpening in Ukraine. The Ukrainian army have taken vast losses, (some reasonable estimates 300,000 Ukrainian troops are dead or seriously wounded, while Russia's losses. though significant, are much lighter.

In fact balanced reports (we Boggart Bloggers look at news sources based in India, Singapore and Israel for confirmation of stories we see in European or american government propaganda mouthpieces,) suggest it is the Ukrainians who are desperate. Remember, it is Bellendskyyyyy who has constantly sought more and better weapons from NATO in order to escalate the conflict, while the neo - Nazi nutters in Kiev have repeatedly tried to draw the USA and NATO into direct involvement with Russian combat units in Ukraine.

Moscow has throughout indicated its willingness to negotiate while Ukrain will consider nothing but total surrender from Russia. And back in April, before the US and its allies started throwing money and weapons into Ukraine's war effort, Turkey's President Erdogan brokered a negotiated peace but Bellebdskyyyyy was ordered by the US and UK that in no circumstances could they negotiate directly with Russia. Ukraine needs to find a way of escalating the conflict and getting NATO troops on the ground, and a false flag event involving a dirty bomb would certainly do that (and also start World War Three.

Russia on the other hand, has nothing to gain by such an act, just as they had nothing to gain from sabotaging the Nord strem pipelines or attacking the Kerch Bridge, both of which are important Russian assets of key economic and strategic importance and which in  both cases The Kremlin was blamed for by the west.

What is a dirty bomb?

Western reporting would also have you believe Russia has suffered a series of embarrassing battlefield setbacks which have prompted the Russian government to issue thinly veiled threat s late last month that they would be willing to resort to using nuclear weapons. Nuclear sabre rattling has also come from other Russian hardliners. Strangely thse media reports omit to mention the threats of nuclear escalation mage by the Biden regime.

On Monday (24 October), the Kremlin stood by its allegation that Ukraine may be preparing to detonate a so-called dirty bomb, which disperses radioactive material.

'According to the information we have, two organisations in Ukraine have specific instructions to create a so-called 'dirty bomb'. This work is in its final stage,' Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov claimed in a statement on Monday. 

Ukraine, the United States, Britain and France have dismissed Moscow's claim athough what is not being reported is the flurry of defence officials flying to and from washington and European capitals, discussing (reportedly,) how NATO might respond to a nuclear event.

Pictured: Daily Mail:  Smoke rises from a building after it was attacked by Russian suicide drones in Kyiv, Ukraine on October 17, 2022. Russia has claimed Ukraine is in the 'final stage' of creating a 'dirty bomb', further raising fears that Moscow will carry out a false flag attack

The purpose of the Ukrainian "dirty bomb" would be to simulate a Russian tactical nuclear weapon. Detonation of the device would (Bellendskyyyyy and the neo - Nazi nutters hope,) trigger the entry of the US 101st Airborne Division into Odessa.

Ukraine watchers expect the false-flag attack to happen somewhere in Nikolayev. The city is already being evacuated for this purpose. The device would  probably consist of several depleted fuel rods from some Ukrainian nuclear power plant and up to 1000 tons of conventional explosive. The resulting radioactive mushroom cloud would be almost indistinguishable from that of a nuclear blast and spread radio - active dust over a wide area. The explosion would be timed to coincide with the arrival of Russian Kalibr missiles.

It would take several hours to analyze the fallout to determine that the origin of the fission products is a nuclear reactor and not a bomb. (The relative abundance of isotopes would tell the time of their creation.) Americans would not publish their results until maybe much later.

The Western media would scream about a Russian nuclear attack and demand retaliation. Remember, this is the same media that told us Russia bombed its own nuclear power plant and blew up its own gas pipeline and exploded a truck bomb on its own bridge.

It would make no difference, that the fallout would be from uranium, while Russian nuclear weapons use plutonium or that there is a world of difference between the radioactivity levels of reactor fuel and wasp[ons grade plutonium. The headlines would read, "Evil Putin used a uranium bomb to create terror," and not even consider the event migh be a a false-flag.

Let's develop the theory that (a) a dirty bomb is set off and (b) Russia knows it did not do it. The west will claim that Russia was to blame and the MSM etc will produce all sorts of evidence that they did. So whatever happens Russia will be vilified in the west.

There is or would an argument that Ukraine has gone rogue and against the wishes of its NATO handlers, but that does not appear to be what is happening. It appears to me and almost certainly to the Russians (who appear to know the score) that this is in fact a NATO false flag. You note I'm ruling out the "Russia did it really" hypothesis here.

Well would Russia react? Yes. They have to. How? My guess is by calling a full moblisation and moving to whatever they call 'shock and awe' in their language. The response would involve crushing  Ukraine totally. Along with a total boycott of vital exports to NATO nations. And I'm guessing there would be malfunctions at various oil refineries etc

How would NATO react? Well Defcon 3 certainly, but possibly also the deployment of troops into western Ukraine - securing Odessa and the offshore oil and gas fields, possibly Polish forces acting as peace keepers in eastern Galicia. Maybe some attempt to get into a shooting war - no fly zone for instance. Maybe direct conflict on the ground.

What about the rest of the world? It's possible the people who run large third world nations may not be as stupid as the western public. There are a huge number of scenarios that might encompass Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel, Brazil, China etc etc. None of them good.

The world would be in a very dangerous place. One step from the cold war bogeyman Mutual Assured Destruction.

So why would NATO risk all this? This scenario must have been rehearsed dozens of times. My guess is that it has escalated badly in every one of them.

The obly conclusion that makes any sense is that the NATO actors have lost their collective grip on rationality here. So if it is completely irrational could it be a Russian false flag? The only reason would be if Putin was indeed the mad bad Vlad, the crazy, vengeful, bloodthirsty psychopath  the media paint him to be. And I cannot see he would have survived as Russia's leader this long if he really was insane. What would Russia have to gain? Like most here I assess the Ukraine's chance of a military victory as vanishingly small. And given Ukraine's behaviour over the past 8 months (and eight years singce NATO, the EU and USA installed the neo - Nazi nutters government in Kiev, the Ukrainians will have to pay a massive price if they want a peaceful settlement now.

So we are left with the view that the current USA (and UK) Military / Industrial Complexes are out of control, in the USA because POTUS is senile and the profits being made from this wart by the Corporate pirateocracy are on a par with those made by the Big Pharma cartel throughout the COVID pandemic hoax. Who knows who is in really charge in the UK or EU? But maybe some faction or cabal in the DC swamp thinks it needs to risk nuclear war to be able to fight Russia? Or maybe they think they can in some way prevail in a nuclear war?

Europe's Depleted Gas Storage Might Not Get Refilled Ahead Of Next Winter
While mainstream news reporting of the conflict in Ukraine continues to pump out a torrent of anri - Russia, pro - war propaganda the catastropic effects of this war that could so easily have been avoided are not mentioned. Well why would warmongering governments admit they have inflicted an energy crisis, food shortages and soaring living costs on their people for no good reason ...

Putin, Macron To Hold Urgent Talks To Halt Military Escalation In Ukraine
Even though the leaders of Ukraine itself are talking down the threat of war with Russia over the breakaway region of Donbas, America and Britain are still beating the war drums and demonising Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Russia insists they have no plans to invade Ukraine and one western leader at least, France's Emmanuel Macron, seems to be listening to messages coming out of the East European trouble spot...

Germany News Mag. Spiegel Asks "Is Vladimir Putin Right?" About NATO Expansion
As the confrontation along the border between Ukraine and Russia has escalated to actual shooting with ethnic Russian rebel separatists in Donbas reporting intensified shelling and initiating a "general mobilization" of military-age males, with Moscow denying they plan to invade and Ukraine's leaders accusing US, UK and French leaders of hysteria for talking up the threat of war, Germany's leading newspaper Spiegel asks the question fundamental to the entire conflict...

While Crazy Joe Biden Claims Victory Over Russia, NATO's Expansin Plans Have Been Derailed By PutinJoe Biden (or his handlers because we all know Joe's mind is gone,) have been trying to spin reports of Russian troops withdrawing from positions close to the Ukraine border as a diplomatic victory for the USA over Putin but in the geopolitical game things are seldom what they seem to be ...

Douma gas attack false flag cover upLeaked email: Senior OPCW Official Orders “Delete All Traces” Of Dissent On Douma Gas Attack Narrative
... The official narrative was designed to justify military intervention by US and NATO in Syria’s civil war, but western leaders were dissuaded fro, this course of action by Russia’s Putin and China’s President Xi. Later it was revealed that a minority report actually considered the facts, which pointed to the gas attack on Douma being a false flag attack carried out by forces attached to terrorist group Al Nusra.

Minority Report on Douma attack exposes ‘compromised reporting & analysis’ by OPCW – MIT professor
The OPCW failed to include evidence on the Douma in its final report, so the resulting document is inherently compromised, an MIT professor said. The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) claimed that gas was dropped from the sky on the Damascus suburb. It did not directly blame on the Syrian government, however.

OPCW Investigators - "No Evidence" Of Chemical Weapons At Syrian Facilities Bombed By US
The independent inspectors commissioned by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) will probably take several months to publish their final report on the alleged gas attack in Douma (an attack for which journalists and other independent parties have failed to find evidence),

It's looks like deja vu all over again. Remember when the US Defence Secretary admitted the Syrian "Rebels" funded and armed by the USA have used chemical weapons against government forces in Syria?
Or when earlier this year, now former Secretary of State Tillerson blamed Russia for an Alleged Syrian chemical attack despite admitting he doesn't know who actually did it? Or when the US finally admitted there was "no evidence" Assad used sarin gas? Or just last week, when Trump said that the US is finally pulling out of Syria as a result of the defeat of ISIS (much to the Pantagon's fury and open-ended timetable for extracting Syrian resources)?

Well, maybe you do, but the neocons back in charge of US war preparations foreign policy - now that war hawk John Bolton is Trump's National Security Advisor - are so stuck with the age-old narrative that Assad is so desperate to be bombed at any cost he used illegal weapons on his own people even when his troops have defeated ISIS, the US backed regime change operation and are now mopping up the last pockets of resistasnce.

[Russia catalogue ] ... [The Russians are coming ] ... [ Terror catalog ] ... [ Ukraine war, western sanctions ] [ Syria index ]

EXPLORE:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Ian Thorpe at Quora ] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Here Come The Russians ] ... [ Latest Posts ] ... [ Blog Bulletin ]