British Democracy In Terminal
Decline - Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year - And
things are worse elsewhere.
by Ian R Thorpe
When we first started Stirring things back in 2005 with a blog called
Little Nicky Mchiavelli, we were pretty much out on a limb in opposing
the 'scientific consensus' that Carbon Dioxide from human activity was
driving climate change. The balance has been shifting for some time and
now even mainstream media is coming to understand that the people who
claimed 'the science is settled' were not scientists but lobbyists for a
corporate agenda.
Contact us:
|
California’s Left Wing Governor Implies People Need To Be Brainwashed Into Believing In Climate Change
from: American Lookout, 7 November 2017
Climate change is like a religion for the left. California’s far left
governor Jerry Brown recently proved it by suggesting Americans need
brain washing to believe in it.
The Sacramento Bee reports:
World needs ‘brain washing’ on climate change, Jerry Brown says at Vatican
Gov. Jerry Brown challenged the world’s religious leaders to further
engage as he minimized the negative effects of President Donald Trump on
meeting the climate-change challenge.
“The Trump factor is very small, very small indeed,” in comparison to
the commitments taking place around the world, Brown said to a burst of
applause Saturday at an event organized by the Vatican’s Pontifical
Academy of Sciences. “That’s nothing to cheer about, because if it was
only Trump that was a problem, we’d have it solved. But that’s not our
only problem.
"The problem … is us. It’s our whole way of life. It’s our comfort …
It’s the greed. It’s the indulgence. It’s the pattern. And it’s the
inertia."
Brown, who arrived Friday for nearly two weeks of climate talks
across Europe, said the path to transformational change must include the
mass mobilization of the religious and theological sphere, but also the
prophetic sphere…
"At the highest circles, people still don’t get it," he said. "It’s not
just a light rinse that’s required. We need a total, I might say ‘brain
washing.’
"We need to wash our brains out and see a very different kind of world."
That sounds like the words of a concerned citizen of course until you
remembr this superannuated hippy's nickname throughout the USA is
"Governor Moonbeam and he presides over a state where non humans and
even on mammals have, with the help of liberasl lawyers and 'liberal'
laws backed by the state legislature have successfully sued those who
violated their "human rights," where in criminal cases having dark skin
is considered proof of innocence and which is at the forefront of the
campaign to win equal rights for paedophiles.
Climate Change: Is There A Holy Grail Of Sustainable Energy Sources
We have wriiten long and eloquently on the push to switch the world
from fossil fuels to "sustainables"; Xavier Connolly, our science and
engineering specialist has debunked the claims of warmageddonists about
the threat posed by Carbon Dioxide, Phil T Looker has exposed the
crazy-farm economics of the anti - carbon brigade and the editor (and
site owner) Ian has demolished the hype around wind and solar (and in
fairness has praised other technolgies that would work but don't fullfil
the Warmagedonnists globalist agenda.)
It seem the message is sinking in at last about the favoured
sustainables, wind and solar generators. Nothing wrong with these
technologies of course, except that the wind does not blow consistently
twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, and the sun absolutely
refuses to shine all around the clock. Some may curse the sun for this
but we think it is something to do with the earth being an approximate
sphere.
The latest folly it seems is the rush to develop battery technology
that can sustain power supplies to a large population, industrialised
nation when the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow. And as
usual the world's leading exponent of technobullsit, elon Musk of Tesla
Cars is in the forefront.
In February of this year, AES Energy’s Escondido battery storage facility
in California was hailed as the largest battery cluster to date, with a
capacity of 30 MW/120 MWh. This is paltry when we consider the needs of
a modern city.
Now however, Tesla is building a bigger one—100 MW/129 MWh—in Australia. It seems like the race to build a better mousetrap bigger battery storage system is well and truly on. But is there to it than that?
Is the race for truly reliable, grid-scale, quick-to-install energy storage solutions
that will make the shift to all-renewable power much more realistic. Or
is the real goal something else? All the evidence to date suggests the
race is to convince major governments that such a storage system will be
available in the near future and thus get the $billions in public money
that will be thrown at the company that succeeds in convincing
politicians it can deliver.
California is one of the places to be if you’re a renewables fan.
Well, it would be, wouldn't it? After all the state is the global
capital of crazy. Its authorities have ambitious plans to lead the world
in destroying Euro - American civilisation and returning to a medieval
economy, eventually hoping to replace all fossil-fuel generation
capacity with windmills. Wholly reliable grid-scale storage systems are crucial for this strategy, and they are becoming increasingly popular in the state.
Unfortunately, the initiative to make the 100-percent renewable plan a law fell through.
Unions, worried about possible job losses, pulled their support.
Legislators themselves tweaked the bill, so its goal is now to produce
100-percent greenhouse-gas-free energy. This can only be achieved by
banning the manufacture of wind turbines, solar panels and lithium ion
batteries in the state, thus shifting the carbon bigfootprint elsewhere.
The debate about the feasibility of the plan and how fast it could
become a reality is ongoing, but so far all attempts to prove the
feasibility of a carbon free society have failed miserably. California
is a cautionary tale for other ambitious clean energy proponents.
Meanwhile, the leaders of the battery pack, buoyed by government grants and subsidies, are expanding. AES recently teamed up with Siemens on a joint venture, Fluence, focusing specifically on energy storage system development.
Tesla is looking in another direction. It already has the largest portfolio
of completed energy storage projects globally, at 300 MWh. What it is
looking for now is integrating future storage systems with wind and
solar electricity producers.
When Tesla said it had won a deal for the construction of the world’s
biggest lithium-ion battery storage facility in Australia, it noted
that the deal involves partnering with local wind power producer, Neoen,
which will supply the battery complex with electricity.
At the same time, AES is working mainly with traditional utilities to
supply them with energy storage capacity, focusing on constantly
improving the energy density and efficiency of its arrays. Tesla’s
all-renewables focus is well documented, and now could give it the lead
in the energy storage race.
Earlier this month, Tesla closed another partnership, with wind power leader Vestas, to develop integrated wind power-energy storage solutions. The Danish company announced earlier
this year that it has big plans for energy storage, with Chairman Bert
Nordberg telling Reuters that the company had 3.2 billion euro (US$3.84
billion) in cash and no debt, so it could afford some good investments.
So far this year, Vestas has invested in almost a dozen battery storage
makers.
Energy storage, according to AES’ CEO Andres Gluski, is “the Holy Grail for renewables.” It is the key to the renewables kingdom of the future, eliminating the adverse effects of renewable power’s intermittency. Integrating this Holy Grail with the clean energy producers is the next step.
Tesla and other battery makers have already made it but realistically
on a very small scale. Staying with traditional energy sources might not
be a bad strategy for governments: once scientists and tech
billionaires are honest enough to admit that producing and recycling
lithium ion batteries is a filthy and (fossil fuel) energy hungry
process that simply moves the pollution to third world nations, it may
well be some considerable time before renewables become the predominant
energy source in the world.
RELATED POSTS:
Will new clean energy process make coal the fuel of the future
Coal, you exclaim, throwing up your hands in horror, the stuff that
covered buildings of industrial towns in black soot, the stuff that
choked miners lungs and sent millions of people to early graves? Coal
the filthiest fuel ever? How can you say it is clean? Well a new
technology recently announced might change your mind. Unless you are a
windmill worshipping Warmageddonist of course.
Warmageddonist Intolerance Increases As The 'Science' Their Case Was built On Collapses.
This publication has always denounced the scaremongering that surrounds
the climate issue and the blatant lies being told by scientists and
politicians. Even thoght the global mean temperature has not risen for
hearly twenty years, climate scientists and green activists claim rate
of increase is accelerating, catastrophe is almost upon us and huge tax
increases are required. It's all bollocks of course, but that does not
stop the witch hunts.
Warmageddonist Intolerance Increases As The 'Science' Their Case Was built On Collapses.
This publication has always denounced the scaremongering that surrounds
the climate issue and the blatant lies being told by scientists and
politicians. Even thoght the global mean temperature has not risen for
hearly twenty years, climate scientists and green activists claim rate
of increase is accelerating, catastrophe is almost upon us and huge tax
increases are required. It's all bollocks of course, but that does not
stop the witch hunts.
We were bullied into buying diesel cars to help the environment. Now experts admit this ‘green’ fuel is killing thousands of us
Remember all that fuss a few years ago about how much better for the
environment it would be if we all drove diesel cars instead of petrol.
As usual, the scientists couldn't see the smoke for the fumes and
politicians only had the interests of oil companies and car makers in
mind. Now it turns out diesel is worse for the envronment and our health
after all. Now what did they call those of us who said that was the
case all along? Conspiracy theorists or something.
Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?
When somebody who has been whining about Warmageddon and the CO2 effect
that is killing life on earth for twenty years suddenly starts talking
not about climate change, athropogenic global warming and the need for
green solutions but the arrogance and greed of those in the green lobby,
it's worth paying attention
Climate Predictions, Economics and Realities
As another blatant to the point of idiocy climate science fraud, the
manipulation of temperature data to make real world observations agree
with climate change predictions made by science is exposed we look at
how over reliance on statistical projections and mathematical models has
put scientists on a par with clowns in the public's estimation.
Unfortunately scientists are more dangerous.
Biofuels - The Great Green Folly
As the promises that wind and solar power could meet all our energy
needs is exposed as pseudo - scientific twaddle by the wind's refusal to
blow steadily all the time and the sun's refusal to shine at night, few
of the alternative energy sources hyped as a replacement for fossil
fuels. Of those, biofuel looks the next most likely to say, "If you
hadn't over hyped me I coulda been somebody, 'stead of a bum. I coulda
been a contender.
HAARP: Scientists Open Pandora's Box With Experiments In Changing The Climate
What do you think of the freak weather this year? Coincidence, climate
change, solar activity or something more sinister. If you have heard the
term HAARP chances are you're pretty sceptical about the official line.
HAARP - the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program is a
research programme that experiments with changing the earh's upper
atmosphere. you don't have to understand much science to realise it
proves that as John Lennon said the world is run by insane people.
Big Green Versus Big Koch
As the war between scaremongering, Warmageddonist supporters of Big
Green and the champions of level headed common sense and healthy
scepticism becomes more and more reminiscent of the bloody civil war in
Syria, The Daily Stirrer brings news of another defector from the
climate science fascism camp. And this time it is a major front man of
the global warming conspiracy.
Laundering Scientific FallaciesFrom
climate change to economic chaos, experts can be relied on to get
things wrong. Does spending too much time in universities make people
stupid or does the computer science used to model reality for fail to
distinguish between reality and wishful thinking? This analysis blows
apart the business of laundering reality to mask the hoplessness of
scientific predictions ...
Gas power stations are greener than wind for low carbon, Policy Exchange claims
Another "We told you so story for The Daily Stirrer. Building gas-fired
power plants instead of more offshore wind farms could actually lead to
greater carbon savings at a lower cost, a leading think-tank has
claimed. In a report out today, Policy Exchange argued that the
government should scrap 4GW of its planned 13GW target for ...
Spain dumps clean-energy subsidies; promptly watches the industry go down like a sinking ship
The news that Spain has dumped it's loonytoons green energy policy will
surprise few people who have followed the wind turbine scam. Wind power
as a source of energy is unreliable and inefficient and it was only in a
fit of green socialist insanity Spain's previous government committed
that beleagured nation to meeting the bulk of its energy needs from wind
and sun powreed generators. The scientists who advised them forgot it
oes dark for approximately half the time and the wind blows when it fels
like blowing.
High Court Says Government's Green Energy OCD Does Not Override Natural Beauty
he Government feels compelled to boost the amount of energy from
renewables as part of climate change targets imposed by Europe because
of pledges that have no basis in law that were given by a previous
government to the smooth faced unelected bureaucrats, the
internationalist Nazis whose agenda aims to create a single European
superstate as a stepping stone towards the establishment of ...
Electricity bills set to rise to pay for wind farm subsidies
While sensible people agree that the climate is causing serious problems
few people still think this is due solely to CO2 emissions from human
activity. Even the author of Gaia theory has said the problem is more
complex. Unfortunately climate scientists with their snouts in the tax
money trough are still pushing the discredited idea that wind turbines
and solar panels can meet our energy needs. Well if that is the case why
are domestic fuel bills rising to pay for subsidies paid to the
operators of these failed technologies. [ also Daily Stirrer 21 May 2012
The Madness Of Carbon Accounting
The Government, along with the politically correct crazies of the Obama
administration are claiming great triumphs in cutting crbon emissions
even as they exhort us to buy more goods manufactured by carbon
intensive processes to boost the failing domestic economies. Buit how
are these cuts to emissions being achhieved and at what cost to the
\economy and social fabric of western nations?
The Great Wind Turbine Con Trick
A detailed and damning critique of wind turbine technology, renewable
energy scams, green lobbying, the dodgy science behind the case for
sustainable power and the politicisation of concerns about the
environment. The whole thing looks more and more like a confidence trick
by academics, politicians, big business and the New World Order ...
Climate Change Menu
Living Within The Conspiracy
Science and Technology
Hurricane Harvey Climate Catastrophe Man Made?
As we reported last week the Hurricane Harvey disaster which has hit
the U.S. states of Texas and Louisiana has shown characteristics never
before observed in any hurricane or tropical storm since records began.
Meteorological depressions (because that is what hurricanes, typhoons
and other intense storms are,) move and once over land quickly weaken as
air pressures become normalised. Harvey has stayed in the same area,
dumping massive amounts of rain on the heavily populated coastal strip
and causing Sbillionsworth of damage through flooding and high winds.
Some scientists have now joined the professional sceptics in questioning whether Harvey
is the latest example of covert weather warfare being waged on
completely unsuspecting populations. Such activity has been hinted at
(but not proved conclusively) by leaked documents and whistleblowers,
and is alleged to involve NASA and DARPA (the Defense advanced Research
Projects Agency.) The existence of HAARP
(High Auroral Atmospheric Research Project) in Alaska is now officially
acknowledged and Freedom of Information laws have forced officials to
admit experiments in weather control have been carried out. It is known
that governments of Russia, China and Iran have conducted weather
control programmes using technology based on the theories of Nikola Tesla
Increasingly catastrophic climate cataclysms appear to be orchestrated and manipulated
by an ever more desperate and aggressive global power structure.
Rapidly accelerating climate and biosphere collapse is not somewhere on
the horizon, it is here, now. And it has little to do with Carbon
Dioxide emissions. Attempts at Climate engineering (carried out by
irresponsibe scientists who haven't a clue of the possible long term con
sequences) are is further fueling the disintegration of the delicate
structure that holds together the natural life support systems of our
planet. With undeniable facts and film footage in the video below
fully exposes the manipulation of Hurricane Harvey, starting from the
fact that where hurricanes can usually be seen building out in mid
Atlantic, this one appeared suddenly from nowhere.
Climate expert and passionate debunker of global warming theory Judith Curry says:
The 12 year drought of major hurricane landfalls in the U.S. is over,
with catastrophic impacts in Texas. Predictions of Hurricane Harvey
illustrate the realization of extended and long-range hurricane
forecasts.
This blog post analyzes the forecasts of Hurricane Harvey made by my company Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN), and also by the National Hurricane Center. READ MORE >>>
It is worth noting that the first man-made climate disaster took
place in Britain in 1952, when a flash flood claimed many lives in
Lynmouth, small town in south west England. And the truth, that the
British Defence Ministry had been conduction cloud seeding experiment on
the uplands above the town prior to the flood did not emerge until
fifty years later when, under UK laws, certain documents were de
classified.
More bad news for warmists: NASA finds no retreat of polar ice
Twenty years ago people who call themselves 'scientists' (although
eminent scientists including Richard Feynman and Michael Crichton have a
few posthumous issues with that claim) began to predict that the polar
ice caps were melting at an accelerating rate and rising sea levels
would flood coastal cities The science is settled' they said.
Scaremongering was always the best marketing tool for the the people who
want to create a global government, and global warming (now revised to
'climate change as the globe has not warmed for a considerable time. It
turned out that though the science was not settled, the ice is.
The scaremongering ploy failed too, many people decided the
predictions of disaster were exaggerated and if the planet became two
degrees hotter, that would be quite nice really. It should have been
obvious even to scientists, who tend to be a bit thick when common sense
is called for, that people prefer warm weather, and no part of the
United States or Europe is in the tropics, where heat from global
warming would be the most bothersome.
But the ice caps just didn't get the message, and, as we reported
yesterday, the ice caps are just as thick as they were decades ago.
Those poor polar bears photoshopped onto ice floes will be just fine,
and the fifty million refugees it was predicted would be displaced by
rising sea levels are comfy in their homes as life goes on in the usual
way.
Now comes data from NASA, the space folks, who, when they are not touting the achievements of
Muslim scientists, study climate change. Their data show that
the extent, as well as the thickness, of the polar ice caps is
unchanged. James Taylor of Forbes reports:
Updated
data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth's
polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments
began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012,
moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above
the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most
frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is
causing the polar ice caps to recede. ...
Updated NASA satellite data show
the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until
the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice
modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded
by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar
ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much
less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as
"proof" of a global warming crisis.) ...
In
late 2012, however, polar ice dramatically rebounded and quickly
surpassed the post-1979 average. Ever since, the polar ice caps have
been at a greater average extent than the post-1979 mean.
Now, in May 2015, the updated NASA data show polar sea ice is approximately 5 percent above the post-1979 average.
During
the modest decline in 2005 through 2012, the media presented a daily
barrage of melting ice cap stories. Since the ice caps rebounded – and
then some – how have the media reported the issue?
The
answer, of course, is that mainstream media have indgnored these
findings a continued to push the 'we're all going to fry / drown / be
eaten by polar bears' narrative because the era we live in is one of
controlled information (fake news) and political / corporate control
freakery.
RELATED POSTS:
German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked
audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate
Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich
Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has
confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling
you for years ...
IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy
of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts
aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable
energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are
stated to amount to £77 billion a year.
Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
Over the years my scepticism about global warming and attempts to
initiate intellgent discussion of the dodgy science based on
mathematical models that forms the basis of the Warmageddonist case,
versus much less alarming projections based on data from real world
observations haveearned me accusations of being a child murderer. Not
only that, some of the lefties who support climate fascism have demanded
the death penalty for people who disagree with them. And yet they think
it unfair to punish certain child rapists and murderers. Hypocrites.
France Moves to Make ‘Conspiracy Theories’ Illegal by Government Decree
Political elites and super-bureaucrats must be very worried. New start
up political parties, dismissed as populist byt in reality listening to
the concerns of voters are making inroads into the political status quo.
New media investigative journalists and op-ed writers are challenging
the official propaganda (and gaining an ever bigger audience). It’s
becoming harder to control consensus reality.
Temperature Was Not Rising But Climate Chief's Cock Was
RAJENDRA Pachauri, until this week one of the world’s most influential
climate politicians, has been grounded in India and barred from the
Delhi institute which provided the springboard for his chairmanship of
the International Panel on Climate Change, as a third woman came forward
alleging sexual harassment.
Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming
Anyone who understood basic arithmetic (like how to work out an average)
and took the trouble to examine the 'science' that backed the climate
change scare understood the whole thing was a fraud. And plenty of
honest scientists were not afraid to say so. But those who went public
faced hate attacks and having their careers trashed. Now however, as
evidence exposes the lies of the global warming lobby, they are starting
to come forward.
EU Policy Mash Roils Markets Before Paris Climate Deal.
First of two stories which show that while failing in their stated
objectives to save the planet, EU and United Nations policies have been
outstanding in their real objectives which were to advance the global
government agenda and to tighten the control of the wealthy elite on the
lives of the masses
Submerged forests' drowned by ancient climate change revealed by 2014 storms.
Here's yet another smack in the mouth for those smug, condescending
scientists who talk down to the rest of us. Far from being a new thing,
climsste change was affecting the environment at the beginning of the
Bronze age. How many fossil fuel burning power stations did the beaker
people have then, and how many Chelsea tractors were tearing up and down
the ridgeways?
Global Warming Nutters To Protest In Record Cold Temperatures
You have to smile at the science worshippers and climate change
Warmageddonists, they are so detached from reality that if the ice caps
were advancing through Europe and North America they's claim it was
caused by global warming. They just don't do real world evidence.
Thanks To The Dishonest Climate Scientists, the Public Doesn’t Know Water Vapor Is Most Important Greenhouse Gas.
Yet another exposure of the lies that have propped up the scientific
dishonesty and corporate greed behind the global warming scare. Climate
change is real, but the climate has changed constantly for millions of
years and whatever the final outcome of what is going on now is not
likely to be catastrophic. Very minor changes over the last hundred
years have been amplified by data manipulation and the likely effects
overstated.
Climategate, the sequel: How we are STILL being tricked with flawed data on global warming.
Daily Stirrer occasional contributor Graham Lear returns to one of our
favourite themes, the climate change hoax, part of a program of
scaremongering being engineered by enemies if freedom and democracy in
the higher echelons of scoiety. This about it, who is pushing the myth
of catatrophic climate change being caused by Carbon Dioxide from human
activity?
Why the war on CO2 has done far more harm than good
Warmageddonists send a lot of time screeching and scaremongering about
the potpentially catastrophic outcomes of increased atmospheric CO2
levels, exaggerating their claims wildly in order to frighten people
into supporting their war on the oil and coal industries. Policies
formulated to tackle the imaginary threat of anthropogenic climate
change have ...
Earth’s CO2 Levels Pass Global Warming ‘Milestone', Nothing Happens - Daily Caller.
After
two decades of panic stricken scientists and screeching lefties wailing
about the catatrophe that would ensue once the concentration of carbon
dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere passed 400 parts per million, that
figure was reached in December 2014.
Insane Science Pushing The Earth Towards Ecocide.
At the Daily Stirrer we have suspected it for a log time, science is
insane, a game for the ethically challenged and sociopathic to compete
to be first to develop a new plague, or a death ray, or to trash the
enviromnent in pursuit of political power or corporate profits for their
paymasters. There's even a name for what they are doing now, Ecocide.
Are Humans Becoming Extinct
some scientists, Guy McPherson included, down at the Climate Change
conference who fear that climate disruption is so serious, with so many
self-reinforcing feedback loops already in play, that humans are in the
process of causing our own extinction.
NASA Data Proves Trump Right to Exit Paris Climate Accord
The science is settled, they kept telling us, and catastropic climate
change is coming at us like a runaway train. If the sun don't fry you,
droughts and famine don't starve you and rising sea levels don't drown
you, then the UV radiation will turn you into a walking, talking
melanoma. Of course there was no real -world evidence for this bullshit,
only output from mathematical models of the climate, produced after the
actual data had been adjusted.
NASA’s own data backs President Trump’s decision to pull out of the
Paris climate agreement, despite the agency’s politicized leaders
claiming otherwise. Additionally, recent Canadian Ice Service data shows
Greenland ice nearing a record high as Arctic sea ice extends over 300,000 square miles past its 2016 levels.
“The useful idiots in the press who report on climate, continue to
insist that the Arctic is melting down and nearing catastrophe,” wrote
climate analyst Tony Heller. “In the actual Arctic, sea ice extent is
normal and Greenland has gained a record amount of ice this winter.”
In 2015, a NASA study showed that Antarctic sheet ice was expanding, refuting claims by global warming advocates that polar ice would soon disappear.
“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow
accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice
to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning
glaciers,” the agency admitted. “The research challenges the conclusions
of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall
losing land ice.”
“According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice
sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to
2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between
2003 and 2008.” Furthermore, there is no such thing as man-made global
warming drastically melting ice in the Antarctic, according to analysis
of Antarctic expeditions from the early 20th century.
When the current sea ice extent in Antarctica is superimposed over
past routes of expedition ships, it reveals that ice on the frigid
continent is largely the same now as it was when Sir Ernest Shackleton
led his crew through hundreds of miles of ice in 1915. It really
shouldn’t be surprising then that it’s mainly politicians – and
establishment scientists receiving grants from those politicians – who
are furious at President Trump for pulling out of the Paris climate
agreement.
“This further demonstrates that the global warming created by man is just a fraud to get more taxes,” reported Zero Hedge.
“Scientists have looked over the logbooks of polar explorers Robert
Falcon Scott and Ernest Shackleton from their expeditions during
1901-1904 and 1907-1909.”
“The theory that sea ice has declined post-1950 because of man cannot be supported.”
Additionally, the sun is reaching a solar minimum, which indicate the Earth is entering a global cooling phase, and perhaps even a mini ice age.
“The longest minimum on record, the Maunder Minimum of 1645-1715, lasted an incredible 70 years,” reported the Global Warming Policy Forum. “It caused London’s River Thames to freeze over, and ‘frost fairs’ became popular.”
“This period of solar inactivity also corresponds to a climatic
period called the ‘Little Ice Age’ when rivers that are normally
ice-free froze and snow fields remained year-round at lower altitudes.”
The goal of the Paris climate agreement is entirely political: the
globalists are trying to scare the world’s population into believing
“global warming” is too big of a threat for their country to handle
alone and thus it can only be “defeated” through the expansion of the UN
and other unelected, global bureaucracies at the expense of their
nation’s sovereignty.
It also allows globalists to control world economies from the
top-down by intentionally handicapping productive countries, such as the
US, from gaining too much prosperity and thus independence from global
bodies.
In particular, the Paris climate agreement would prevent the US from
regaining its economic might by burdening companies and average
Americans with overzealous “climate change” regulations which aren’t
fully enforced on China and numerous third-world nations.
It would put the US at a severe disadvantage it could never recover from.
In short, “man-made climate change” is an manufactured problem
exaggerated by the government to instigate a public reaction – fear –
the government then exploits to offer a predetermined solution: the
expansion of government at the public’s expense.
The global elite are currently meeting at the Bilderberg conference
in Chantilly, Virginia, to discuss ways to undermine President Trump’s
decision to pull out of the Paris agreement.
The Bilderberg Group was one of the primary global bodies responsible
for orchestrating the “global warming” agenda to marginalize
independent nation-states.
RELATED POSTS:
Left Goes Apocalyptic over Trump Paris Decision, ACLU Calls It ‘Assault on Communities of Color’
Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[ Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [ Scribd]...[ Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [ Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [ Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
Merkel Furious After Trump Refusal To Toe The Party Line Causes G-7 Failure To Agree To Agree On Climate Change
So things dod not go according to the New World Order plan at Donald
Trump's first G-7 summit, where the US president refused to be pushed
around by leaders of second division powers including German Chancellor
Angela Merkel and new French President Emmanuel Macron. The G7 was
downgrated from the G8 because of Vladimir Putin's obstinacy in
resisting Obama's efforts to depose the Assad regime in Syria, now
appearsd to be heading towards further diminuition as the G6. Those
loyal to the Obama doctrine of American global hegemony had hoped to
persuade the US president to endorse the totally meaningless Paris
Agreement climate pledge to fight global warming.
By the end of the summit - held over 24 - 26 May at a luxury hotel in
Taormina, Sicily they had to face up to their failure to persuade Trump
to adopt the policy of scaremongering about climte disaster in order to
advance the gloablisation agenda. Trump reiterated his determination to
break the global mold by refusing to follow the Group of Seven line not
only on global warming but also by resisting certain measures on trade
that will favour global corporations to the detriment of smaller, local,
independent businesses.
Furthermore, the final G-7 communique gave the U.S. its own section to say that it is “undergoing a review process” and is unable to join in the discussion, an official cited by Bloomberg
said. As a result while the US will remain excluded from the final
affirmation that the other six, call it the G-6, will reaffirm that they
agree to agree to the Paris Agreement on climate change, which commits
signatories to agree that there is a climate, which Trump tweeted
Saturday he’d come to a decision on next week.
Needless to say, Merkel who had hoped to leave the Saturday summit
with the G-7 agenda endorsed by everyone, including Trump, was furious
at the US president.
“The whole discussion about climate has been difficult, or rather
very unsatisfactory" German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters
Saturday. "Here we have the situation that six members, or even seven if
you want to add the EU, stand against one. That means there are no
signals until now whether the U.S. will remain in the Paris Agreement or
not. We have therefore not talked around it but made clear that we the
six member states and the EU remain committed to the goals of the
agreement.”
The unhappy German continued: "The fact that we have not been able to
make progress here is of course a situation in which you have to say
that there is no common support for an important international
agreement. This Paris Agreement is not simply any old agreement, but
it’s rather a core agreement.”
She concluded by noting the unprecedented breach of agreement within
the ranks, perhaps a first in G-7 history “There is right now no
agreement. But we have made very clear that we are not moving away from
our positions.”
Moments later, the final declaration released a just as stunning
statement, which said that the U.S. was "not in a position to join
consensus" on climate change. Trump’s lack of rapport with European
leaders on this issue raises serious questions about his ability to work
with critical U.S. allies. This accords with his 'America first'
campaign rhetoric, so why is anyone surprised?
There was at least some concensus on trade among the leaders, after
haggling over wording on protectionism and reciprocal benefits, the WSJ
reported. Technical negotiations went on into the early hours of morning
in Taormina to try to reconcile Trump’s ‘America First’ approach with
the other leaders’ commitment to open markets. The result is a reference
to combating protectionism to be included in the final text, according
to two of the officials. Still, said the third, the document in its
current draft clearly falls back by comparison to earlier G-7
communiques which go close to committing leaders to a borderless world
(with free movement of goods and labour which are very bad for working
and middle class people, and free movement of money (to wealth -
freiendly tax jurisdictions) which is very good for the super rich.
RELATED POSTS:
EU Refuses to Block Eurozone Integration to Reach Agreement With UK
Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said at the E?U summit on British
membership terms that the European Union wants to reach an agreement
with the United Kingdom, but it is not prepared to compromise the
banking union (financial integration) or the further integration of
monetary union (UK being forced to abandon the pound join the Euro?) to
achieve this goal.
Afghan troops defect to Taliban in Helmand
According to news sources in Pakistan, up to sixty five Afghan soldiers,
trained and armed by US and European military advisers, have defected
to the resurgent Taliban, taking their weapons and equipment with them.
Another 88 are reported to have been killed in heavy fighting between
Taliban irregulars and government forces in the southern province of
Helmand.
The Revolution Is Spreading: Now Austria Turns Against The Anti - White Leftist Elite
With Sweden's coalition of opponents, formed to deny a place in
government to the anti - immigration, pro - Swedish culture party The
Sweden Democrats a place in government that was their democratic right,
falling apart; with France's Front National, led by Marine Le Pen
topping polls and other parties opposed to mass immigration and the
destruction of European culture riding high elsewhere, Austria has
become the latest nation where voters have turned their backs on the
consensus politics of Cultural Marxism.
The International Elite's Contempt For National Sovereignty
Ersatz Culture Created By World View Theorists To Undermine Western Values
A global corporateocracy
The Government-Corporate Complex Takes Complete Control Of The USA.
If Free Market Capitalism Is The Global Economic System, WTF Is This All About?
Corporatism: Government of The People By The Technocrats For The Monopoly Men Of The Global Elite
Centralized power - the worst of all possible worlds
How Globalism and Big Agriculture Corporations Are Destroying Independent Farmers.
Scientific Dictatorship: Totalitarian World Government Is Not A New Idea
The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech and Information
Here's How Working Class Organisations Out Of Which the Labour Movement Grew Were Hijacked By Elitist Control Freaks.
European Commission puts business profits before the needs of the world’s poorest.
Is Europe Waking Up To The Threat Of Globalism Posed by Secret Trade Treaties
Privatization of Water as an Owned Commodity Rather Than a Universal Human Right
US-EU Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) Will Have Devastating Social and Environmental Consequences
Foreign Exchange Market Rigging: Another Conspiracy Theory Exposed As Truth
Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership Attacks Democracy
A Song Of Servitude (poem)
Holy City (poem)
Our New Unhappy Lords
Is a Global Wide Cash Ban Coming
Post Trump And Brexit Globalists Next Move
The Real Rate Of Inflation, USA, UK (Europe’s is off the scale). The Global Economy Is Bankrupt
Globalists Like Soros Are Now Blatantly Moving Forward Their Totalitarian World Government Agenda
Oh What A Tragedy For Globalists: Here’s what we will miss by being outside the EU
Former Morgan Stanley Chief Asia Economist: “Don’t Listen To The Ruling Elite, The World Economy Is In Real Trouble”
U2 Celeb Bono partners with Monsanto, G8, to biowreck African farms with GMOs
Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[ Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [ Scribd]...[ Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [ Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [ Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
Germany Facing Mass Blackouts Because The Wind And Sun Won’t Cooperate
Germany’s power grid came close tp collapse in January because the
poor performance from sustainables, wind turbines and solar panels which
the Germany government encouraged heavy investment in, data from a
major trade union leaked to German business newspaper Deutsche
Wirtschasfts Nachrichten.
Wind and solar power plants under-performed in January, 2017, because
of cloudy weather with little or no wind, setting the stage for massive
blackouts. It is worth remining ourselves that the largest wind
turbines, around 100 meters high, the only onces capable of generating
power profitably on a commercial scale, require winds of around 25Kph
(20 mph) to run efficiently and they have to be locked down in winds
gusting over 50 Kph (40 mph).
A major blackout almost
occurred Jan. 24 and was only prevented when German energy suppliers
“also took the last reserve power plant,” Michael Vassiliadis, head of
the union which represents power plants of IG Bergbauchemie Energie,
told reporters. The country’s power grid was strained to the absolute
limit and could have gone offline entirely, triggering a national
blackout, if just one power plant had gone offline, according to
Vassiliadis.
“The renewables could not even offer five percent [of total power
demand.] Coal, gas and nuclear power kept the country almost in the
first place under the electric current,” Vassiliadis said.
Germany was forced to recommission coal power plants mothballed due
to compliance with EU targets for CO2 reduction to simply keep the
lights on. The country’s green energy plans calls for the shut down of
30 such power plants by 2019. Britain's energy security is in a
similarly precarious state thanks to sustainable or'green' energy
policies that have fallen far short of expected output levels, cost a
phenomenal amount of money in subsidies to operators and led to a
failure of forward planning to meet future demand.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[ Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [ Scribd]...[ Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [ Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [ Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
The Global Warming Scam Is A Weapon In The War On Free Speech
An article in The Washington Times looks at the latest move to
silence those who question the motives of the climate change lobby and
the pseudo science behind the scam. I, and many of my friends, all
believers in freedom of speech and expression, have frequently been
callede 'climate deniers' and worse for exposing the statistical frauds
behind climate change scaremongering.
Nobody denies there is a climate of course, and nobody denies that it
changes. Sometimes a sunny day changes to cold and cloudy, sometimes
the sun hardly warms our lands for wekas as rain, snow and hail pummel
us. The wind blows strongly on Tuesday, uprooting treees and overturning
high sided goods vehicles but on Wednesday, hardly a cats paw ripples
the surface of the lake. Mark Twain, who was very wise and did not need
mathematical models to help him understand that some things lie beyond
the meddling of man, observed that "everybody talks about the weather
but nobody does anything about it."
The attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands thinks he has found
the way to silence, once and for all, the debate over global warming, or
climate change, or whatever the 'progressive liberals' and other
authoritarian neo fascists are calling the scam this week. Claude Walker,
the Obama of the Caribbean who leads the assault on not just free
speech but freedom of thought in the idyllic Caribbean microstate
presented a subpoena this week to compel the Competitive Enterprise
Institute, a public policy think tank skeptical of the climate scam, to
turn over all its documents relating to the Institute’s research.
His 14-page subpoena demands the Institute’s documents,
communications, emails, op-eds, speeches, advertisements, letters to the
editor, research, reports, studies and memoranda of any kind —
including drafts — that refer to climate change, greenhouse gases,
carbon tax, climate science and the like that in any way are related to
Exxon Mobil or the "products sold by, activities carried out by
ExxonMobil that directly or indirectly impact climate change."
Mr. Walker reveals the real intent of his lawsuit with a demand for a
list of donors to the Institute, the better to pressure them with
threats of legal harassment. "We’ve been targeted for our opinions,"
says Kent Lassman, the new president and CEO of the Institute. Mr.
Walker, in fact, is merely acting as the front man for 20 states who
have joined forces to prosecute organizations that have exposed the
doomsday wailing and gnashing of teeth that is the stock in trade of the
global-warming industry.
"Not everyone believes that the planet is warming," Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee, wrote recently in USA Today,
"and not everyone who thinks [the planet] is warming agrees on how
much; not everyone who thinks that it is warming even believes that laws
or regulation can make a difference. Yet the goal of these state
attorneys general seems to be to treat disagreement as something more or
less criminal."
In fact the ultimate goal of the ruling elites has little to do with
global warming or climate change. The goal is clearly to demonstrate
that the government has the power to punish dissent, silence criticism,
shut down objections and disagreement, and even prosecute those who have
politically incorrect thoughts. You must let government make all your
decisions for you, because we have PhD qualifications in Philosophy,
Politics and Economics while you the masses are stupid and cannot
understand complex issues. Government must be unimpeded in doing
whatever it wants to do to youir life.
"[This subpoena] is designed not only to silence us," says Myron
Ebell, an official of the Institute, "but it is also designed to defund
us. These [are] efforts to defund us and other free-market groups that
have politically incorrect views on climate and some other major issues.
We’ve been dealing with this for a long time, but I think we have now
reached another level. When you get an attorney general involved, it’s
no longer just a debate in the public base that tries to shut us up, but
it’s using the full force of the state to do so."
So there you have it, the climate change scare is really, as my
friends and I have always said, about power and control and little to do
with saving the planet. This last bit is probably fortunate as not of
the predictions of catastrophe in recent years (ice cap melt, rishing
sea levels, 50 million refugees, no more snow, mass extinction, the
destruction of coral reefs and widespread famile because of crop failure
have actually happened so it's a good thing world leaders only managed
to agree that 'something must be done' without actually having a clue
what. Because any money spent would have been wasted and any actions
such as the proposed but in practical terms impossible geoengineering
projects might well have resulted in far worse humancatatstrophes than
the very worst predicitions of the climate scientists mathematical
models of the climate could produce.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Global Temperature Record Is A Smoking Gun Of Collusion And Fraud In Climate Science
Are the latest leaked documents from the Global Warming conspiracy
published by Wikileaks the smoking gun the carbon dioxide driven climate
change sceptics have been waiting for? The ceretainly demonstrate
beyond not just reasonable doubt but any doubt at all that the research
grant phising climate scientists deliberately changed data so the
algorithms would give the answer they wanted.
If global warming is real, then why does the NOAA's own data show no warming for 58 years?
Suddenly ‘Global warming' is a seriously hot topic again; after a period
in which many prominent scientists who not long ago would have been
reluctant to point of the flawed science and fraudulent statistics
behind the scam, for fear of having their careers and reputations
trashed by 'The Science Inquisition', now almost every day there’s a new
report claiming that humans are to blame for climate change
Paris Climate conference: Scientists Debunk Global Warming Scaremongering
As national leaders and self interested science whore collaborated to
impose of the world a United Nations “climate regime” based on the vile
and authoritarian Agenda 21 agreement, at the COP21 global-warming
summit, a group of internationally respected scientists and
environmentalists from various fields presented research at a separate
conference in Paris that ridiculed the climate change hysteria.
German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked
audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate
Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich
Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has
confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling
you for years ...
Volkswagen Emissions Scandal - Is It The Tip Of The Iceberg?
The real problem here is that, driven by the hysterical warnings of self
interested pseudo-scientists, politicians have set unachievable targets
for reducing emissions while demanding that national economies keep
growing.
Climate Change: Physicist Asks Is a Deadly Ice Age on the Horizon?
The last ice age ended approximately 12,000 years ago, and since then
we’ve been enjoying a pleasantly warm “interglacial period.” But given
that an interglacial may last only 12,000 years, we’re confronted with a
scary prospect: Another ice age may be nigh.
America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism
Several times now it has looked as if the climate chance scare was over
as the enthusiasm of climate scitentists for changing real world data to
fit in with the predictions of their mathematical models has been
exposed. But as the scare was never about the environment, but was a
scam to redistribute wealth from rich to poor countries, the politicians
are throwing their propaganda budgets behind it again.
Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA
Updated
data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps
have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring
the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice
extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated
data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming
claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.
Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess
Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global Warming Policy Foundation
(GWPF), has said temperature readings from the Arctic and Antarctic used
to estimate the effects of global warming are nothing more than
guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to carry out a
wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on global warming.
Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
Over the years my scepticism about global warming and attempts to
initiate intellgent discussion of the dodgy science based on
mathematical models that forms the basis of the Warmageddonist case,
versus much less alarming projections based on data from real world
observations haveearned me accusations of being a child murderer. Not
only that, some of the lefties who support climate fascism have demanded
the death penalty for people who disagree with them. And yet they think
it unfair to punish certain child rapists and murderers. Hypocrites.
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[ Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ Scribd]...[ Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [ Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]
Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
See Nobel physics laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel
Laureates meeting 1st July 2015.
Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about
global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of
the climate.
What he shows here is horrifying as it exposes the complete dishonesty of those who advise governments on matters of science.
Less than 1º increase in almost 200 years, which could even be
attributed to measuring errors. Only 8 thermometers accross the globe,
the possible errors of measurement, the fact that they deliberately
added the ocean and ommited the antartic cooling before the Paris
conference. The cost for human societies of reducing CO2 is in general
insanely high. I would expect that some super strong science would be
behind those decisions, but apparently it is precisely the opposite
RELATED POSTS:
Paris Climate conference: Scientists Debunk Global Warming Scaremongering
As national leaders and self interested science whore collaborated to
impose of the world a United Nations “climate regime” based on the vile
and authoritarian Agenda 21 agreement, at the COP21 global-warming
summit, a group of internationally respected scientists and
environmentalists from various fields presented research at a separate
conference in Paris that ridiculed the climate change hysteria.
Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Another respected scientist comes out and denounces the science behind
the climate change scare as a fraud. The whole thing has been a scam to
justify punitive taxes on fuel and enable the rich to make fortunes
trading carbon credits. Again it shows what a sack of rogues the climate
science community really are.
Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*
I've had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have
been saying that if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related
activites the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would
all burn. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying
was "after dinner". Then it got to "Tomorrow ...... or the day after
tomorrow perhaps," then "next year", "before 2050," and eventually
"soon."
What if man-made climate change is all in the mind?
If our view of reality is shaped by the mind and our perceptions of
information, how successful are attempts to manipulate the perceptions
of the whole populations through manipulated data, spin and assertions
of authority likely to be. As scientists and politicians moan that the
public no longer take sertiously climate change scare stories, we have
to conclude, not very.
Meteorologists Begin To Admit To Climate Engineering
The freethinkers and Libertarians of New Media have been questioning the
pseudoscientific certainties of the global warming lobby for a long
time. During that often acrimonious process (because the Global Warming
lobby are ever bit as organised and as driven by blind hatred of those
who question them as the Bearded Queens In Bridal Gowns lobby) and most
of us have been accused of infanticide, genocide and worse. At last the
respectable climate scientists (the ones who didn't sell their arse for
the corporate dollar) are speaking, and the media are listening.
Mad Scientists Now In A Race To Create Human - Animal Hybrids
Scientists all over the world are busy creating extremely bizarre
human-animal chimeras. Once again The Daily Stirrer has to say "We told
you so". There is something very creepy and sinister embedded in the
typical scientists desire to play God. It is a complete, psychopathic
disregard for moral boundaries. If we can do it that ...
UK Offshore Windfarms Produce More Rust and CO2 Than Electricity
A
private case going through a British court of arbitration at the moment
involves two very large supply organisations.
Unfortunately the case is being heard away from the prying eyes and
radar like ears of the media. A 1996 Act Of Parliament enabled such
things as a way to free up Court time taken up by complex technical
disputes…. And, perhaps, to keep embarrassing truths away from ...
Doctors may withhold treatment from patients with "green lifestyle issues."
A few weeks ago an item on the BMA's website linked to the "Doctors
against climate change" group of the doctors' trade union. This body of
medico-environmental socialist - utopians stated ...
The Two Faces Of The Politics Of Failure
What a mess the modern way of doing politics based on a politically
correct consensus and social engineering has produced. The daily stirrer
looks at how the bipolar left - right divide stops things getting
better rather than helping get the developed world back on track.
Green Policies Will Not Save The Planet But Are Costing Poor Families The Earth>
Politicians bleat sabout the plight of the poor then press on with their
clean, green, sustainable energy policies which include stealth taxes
to subsidise expensive and inefficient wind turbine and solar panel
power generators. Can they not see it is the green agenda that is
driving up inflation ...[Environment]
Solar Storm Armageddon: Will This Be What Makes Warmageddonists Shut T F UP
An eruption on the surface of the sun, aka solar storn will send a flood
of highly charged particles towards earth. Satellite communications and
other technology might suffer sone disruption but the best thing about
it is from here in the north of England we will be able to see the
Aurora.
The Danish Experience - Problems With Wind Power And The Truth About Turbines
The
truth about wind turbines, their real efficiency as opposed to the
hyperbolic claims of clean sustainable energy firms and their lobbyists,
politically correct politicians and green activists and how wind farm
operators have been given a licence to pick the pockets of taxpayers
Statistics, Graphs and Hockey Sticks
A poem about the famous hocvkey stick graph and the science scam it was
a frony for. Posted now as a valedictory celebration because US climate
monitoring agncies NASA and NOAA have at last admitted the global
average temperature has risen only marginally over the past few decades.
Climate Change - The Edge Of The Abyss
Media and government reports still say we are staring into the abyss
because carbon emissions are too high. But have they ever though we
would have to shut down all economic activity in the developed world to
change things.
We Might As Well Ask The CRU climate scientists to forcast the economic trends
As our finance expert John de Roe digests today's economic statement by
Chancellor George Osborne we advise readers to ignore gloomy economic
forecasts from supra national bodies with close political ties to the
"New World Order". Both the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development) and the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) along
with numerous other thinky tanky type thingies published their latest
economic forecasts ahead of the Chancellors statement. These forecasts
which are invariably gloomy and predict ...
Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[ Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [ Scribd]...[ Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [ Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [ Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA
Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar
ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began
measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total
polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The
updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global
warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to
recede.
The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not
have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the
end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were
quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s.
Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would
appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice
extent.
Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at
approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade.
Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several
years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent
from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea
and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists
focused on the sea ice loss as “proof” of a global warming crisis.)
Read full article ...
In our efforts to expose the global warming sacre as a scientific
scam aimed at justifying masive taxes on energy, we have returned again
and to the theme of how all data supplied as evidence of catatsrophic
global warming was in fact the output form mathematical models running
on computers and fed 'adjusted' (i.e. fraudulent) data. Again and again
we and many other alternative news sites have produced evidence to back
our arguments, only to be met with a hysterical backlash from science
zealots accusing us of heresy. Well sorry guys, science is not a
religion and if you keep lying to try to prove your God infallible,
those inconvenient real world facts are going to trip you up again and
again.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Weather Channel Founder Slams Global Warming Fraud
The climate change lobby have been on the back foot for a long time as
eminent scientists queued to be next to point out that when real world
observations repeatedly contradict data produced by mathematical models
run on university computer systems, any credible research team would
take a long critical look at their models rather than adjusting the
empirical data so it gives the required answer.
German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked
audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate
Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich
Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has
confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling
you for years ...
Climate fraud exposed
EU climate policy is a scam
The economic realities that expose the climate change fraud
Media lies that propped up climate change scare
Challenge climate scare and you'll be subjected to a witch hunt
The real agenda behind the climate scam
Climate change index
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]
We have always taken the line that the Anthropogenic Global Warming
scare, which posits that instability in the global climate is due solely
to carbon dioxide gas emitted because of human activity is a scam to
justify massive taxes on citizens in the developed world. With an
economist, a management consultant and an engineer on the team we think
we are qualified to comment although some argue we are not 'trained
scientists' and therfore 'cannot understand the science'.
That is bollocks of course, 'the science' in question is basic
arithmetic. But to silence those critics who say we are not entitled to
an opinion, here's a physicist saying more of less what we have said on
the 'science'.
Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st
July 2015.
Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about
global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of
the climate.
The only cure for government led "Warmageddonism", is honest, unbiased,
objective science like the video above presents. Governments and
Banksters are using fear of natural occurrences, to extort trillions of
dollars worldwide, and giving taxpayers nothing in return. Merely a
transference of wealth, not from rich nations to poor nations as they
would have you believe but from taxpayers to oligarchs. And it is the
poor who will be hit hardest. It's the greatest scam of all time (bigger
even than religion).
Fair Use: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must
request permission from the copyright owner.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog]
As Global Government Geeks Push For Paris Climate Deal, New Report throws More Doubt On Climate Science
As a hoard of political leaders, assorted 'experts' and 'scientists',
research asistants, SPADs, secretaries, lobbyists, prostitutes and
hundreds of other hangers on pack their bags ready to head for Paris by
private jet, in order to attend the lastest jolly climate
change summit on cutting CO2 emissions, yet another piece of evidence
has emerged that 'the science' propping up claims that Carbon Dioxide
will kill us all by next Tuesday, next year, the middle of the next century or somtime after that, is not quite as settled as we have been told.
While the 'climate scientists' who have been promoting the
Anthropogenic Global Warming scare are all computer geeks whose
'evidence'in support of their theopries is generated entirely by
mathematical models contructed from 'adjusted data', a team of
atmospheric chemistry boffins from France and Germany say they have
identified a new process by which vast amounts of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere from the sea - a process which was unknown until recently, meaning that existing climate models do not take account of it.
The effect of VOCs released into the atmosphere is to cool the
climate down, thus the computer generated climate models used to predict
catastrophic warming are failing to factor in at least one important
element in the equation. While Warmageddonosts still run around yelling
WE'RE ALL DOOMED, this is just one of many pieces of research that while
totally unreported by mainstream media, goes a long way to explaining
why, even though the temperature of the political climate has been
rising, global mean temperatures have actually been stable for more
almost twenty years, a circumstance which was not predicted by climate
models and which climate science is still struggling to accept as they
try to claim that if the emprical data does not agree with the
synthesized predictions, then the real world must be wrong.
In simple terms, this research reveals that a key VOC, isoprene,
produced by living organisms (for example plants and trees on land and
plankton in the sea) is also produced in the "microlayer" at the top of the ocean
by the action of sunlight on floating chemicals - no life being
necessary. And according to the German / French team it is produced very
large amounts.
According to an announcement just issued by the German government's Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research:
Atmospheric chemists can now demonstrate that isoprene may be
formed, without the presence of biological sources, in the surface film
of seawater, by sunlight. This explains the large discrepancy between
field measurements and models. The new identified photochemical reaction
is therefore important to improve the accuracy of existing climate
models which, although they are portrayed as infallible (cuz it's
science, yeah!) have so far proved wildly inaccurate in all their predictions.
Current global climate models assume emissions of isoprene from all
sources including trees, plants, plankton and micro - organisms of
around one point nine megatons per year. According to the new research
however, newly discovered "abiotic" processes release as much as 3.5
megatons, previously not included in algorithms. This "could explain the
recent disagreements between models and reality," the researchers
claim.
"We were able for the first time to trace back the production of this
important aerosol precursor to abiotic sources. So far global
calculations consider only biological sources," explains Dr Christian George from French lab the Institute of Catalysis and Environment, in Lyon.
VOCs such as isoprene have been identified as a powerful factor in
the natural processes regulationg the climate, because they enable the
formation of aerosol particles. Some aerosols, for instance black soot,
have a warming effect, but the ones resulting from VOCs have a
substantial cooling effect because they act as nuclei for the formation
of clouds. It has previously been believed
that VOC production from pine forests could act as a negative feedback
of such significance that it "limits climate change from reaching such
levels that it could become really a problem in the world."
The discovery of the new abiotic process, the theory that unless
carbon emissions from human activity are cut drastically, catastrophic
clobal warming is inevitable loses much of its credibility. That's
probably good news, as it has emerged lately that recent efforts to cut
carbon emissions are having the unfortunate effect of poisoning the planet.
The full report of this research on VOCs is available as a .pdf file the learned journal Environmental Science and Technology. The Leibniz Institute notes: "Because of the great importance this paper will be open access".
IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
Environmental Economists Claim Fossil Fuels Receive Large Subsidies
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy
of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts
aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable
energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are
stated to amount to £77 billion a year.
On closer analysis however the alleged fossil fuel subsidy turns out
not to be a subsidy at all, but an estimate (guess, wish,) of the costs
to governments of dealing with fossil fuel pollution. The IMF have
insisted however that their figure is “shocking,” but “extremely
robust”, and are using it to lobby for an end to “subsidies” for fossil
fuel companies on both health and economic grounds, the Guardian has reported.
“When the number came out at first, we thought we had better double
check this!” said David Coady, head of the IMF’s fiscal affairs
department. But he said the broad picture was “extremely robust”,
adding: “It is the true cost associated with fossil fuel subsidies.”
Vitor Gaspar, the IMF’s head of fiscal affairs and former finance
minister of Portugal agreed, saying “These estimates are shocking.
Energy prices remain woefully below levels that reflect their true
costs.”
According to the IMF’s report, cutting the ‘subsidies’ would reduce
global emissions by 20 percent, and halve the number of deaths from
outdoor pollution, saving around 1.6 million lives a year although no
information as to how this migh happen is offered, a 20% contraction in
the global economy perhaps?. They also envisage that making fossil fuel
companies pay for pollution would be a “game changer” for governments,
who could use the newly released economic resources to pay for
education, health and infrastructure.
We have to be gobsmacked by the ignorance and naivete of these people;
all that would happen is fuel prices would rocket forcing food and
consumer goods prices up, millions of people in the developed world
would be pushed into poverty, wages and welfare bils would rise and the
global economy would go into a deflationary spiral.
Lord Nicholas Stern, a climate economist at the London School of
Economics, said, somewhat nonsensically: “This very important analysis
shatters the myth that fossil fuels are cheap by showing just how huge
their real costs are. There is no justification for these enormous
subsidies for fossil fuels, which distort markets and damages economies,
particularly in poorer countries.
As if seeking to demonstrate this is just another exercise in sacremongering,
Stern added that the IMF’s figure should be considered an underestimate
(again absolutely no evidence is offered): “A more complete estimate of
the costs due to climate change would show the implicit subsidies for
fossil fuels are much bigger even than this report suggests,” he said.
The IMF accepts that ending the (imaginary) subsidy on fossil fuels
would increase energy prices, but argues that it would be acceptable to
do so as wealthy people benefit most from the supposed subsidy.
According to the IMF, the wealthiest 20 percent receive six times the
amount of subsidy as the poorest 20 percent in low and middle income
countries, presumably simply because they use more energy than poor
people.
Again this is the kind of bollocks only privileged, university dumbed
down elitist idiots could try to sell. Whereas the moderately affluent
(such as myself) would not even blink if our energy bills increased by
twenty per cent, to people living on the edge of poverty it would mean
having to choose between heating their homes and putting food on the
table. The IMF know this, which exposes their dishonesty as well as their stupidity.
The cabal of idiots working for the renewables / carbon trading lobby
has also inadvertently revealed the true motive for releasing these
fairy tale figures: they need to whitewash the amount governments spend
on actual subsidies (not guesstimates or wishful thinking) for renewable
energies each year by piling costs onto fossil fuels until they become
unsustainable. “If we get the pricing of fossil fuels right, the
argument for subsidies for renewable energy will disappear. Renewable
energy would all of a sudden become a much more attractive option,” said
Coady.
Unfortunately no matter how competitive in price renewable energy becomes, wind turbines will still not generate when the wind does not blow and more that solar panels will produce electricity when the sun does not shine.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Big Business Joins Climate Change Scaremongers
The Paris summit on climate change approasches, which means the tree
hugging fascist tendency are turning up the volume to eleven again.
Trouble is they cannot produce a shed of evidence to back up their wild
claims of imminent catastrophe because global warming only exists in
their mathematical models, in the real world it is not happening/
"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
Kill All Intelligent People
Will New German Study End Global Warming Hysteria?
Volkswagen Emissions Scandal - Is It The Tip Of The Iceberg?
The real problem here is that, driven by the hysterical warnings of self
interested pseudo-scientists, politicians have set unachievable targets
for reducing emissions while demanding that national economies keep
growing.
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]
Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess
by Hurricane Hughes - climate correspondent, 15 May, 2015
Many alternative media sites sceptical of the dodgy science behind
the global warming scare, The Haily Stirrer among them, regularlyu
question the climate scientists practice of 'adjusting' temperature data
fed into the computer models on which predictions of climate
catastrophe are based.
Now a climate scientist, Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global
Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), has said temperature readings from the
Arctic and Antarctic used to estimate the effects of global warming are
nothing more than guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to
carry out a wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on
global warming.
Launched primarily in response to interested parties flagging up
major discrepancies between what climate scientists' models say is
happening and what observable changes are taking place in the real
world. Prompted by observations that while data from weather stations,
marked 2014 out as the hottest year on record, data gathered from
satellites, which showed no measurable warming has taken place for over
18 years, the review aims to explain such mismatches. The scale of the
discrepancy has led to accusations that weather station data had been
“adjusted”, thereby exaggerating the effects of global warming,
something which the Foundation is keen to investigate.
The review panel, headed by Professor Terence Kealey, the former
vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, will be taking
submissions for evidence until the 30th June, but Dr Peiser has said
that questions and concerns have already been raised about how the
discrepancy could have come about.
“There’s a lack of clarity, a lack of transparency and a growing
concern about what is going on,” he told the Express. “Given these
concerns, we thought there must be a better way of answering these
questions.
“This is not about anthropogenic or man-made climate change, this is
about whether the gatekeepers of the data, the meteorological agencies,
are providing reliable information.”
Dr Peiser raised concerns that some researchers who contribute to the
temperature records have been outspoken in their views on climate
change, saying: “People ask why they are the gatekeepers of the data if
they have such strong opinions. Should they really be the guardians of
data quality and high standards?
Data adjustments are not the only issue raised so far by the review.
Dr Peiser also highlighted the practice of “infilling” data where a lack
of weather stations means no real world readings are being taken.
Without gathering real world data, these data points are nothing more
than guesswork.
And he said there were problems both with the siting of weather stations, and with differences arising between technologies.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Latest Posts
Paris Climate conference: Scientists Debunk Global Warming Scaremongering
As national leaders and self interested science whore collaborated to
impose of the world a United Nations “climate regime” based on the vile
and authoritarian Agenda 21 agreement, at the COP21 global-warming
summit, a group of internationally respected scientists and
environmentalists from various fields presented research at a separate
conference in Paris that ridiculed the climate change hysteria.
Climate - the CO2 effect overstated
Some clear thinking on climate change
The cost to civilisation of Green scaremongering
The political agenda behind climate scares
Climate Change index
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]
UN IPCC Climate Change Report Will Warn Of 'Severe, Pervasive' Effects Of Global Warming
That is, the refusal of the climate to deliver scaremongering
predictions will have the severe and pervasive effect of exposing
climate science as a sham
 Warmageddonists are pestering that poor bloody polar bear again. Flooding, dangerous heatwaves, ill health and violent conflicts
among likely risks if the world keeps burning fossil fuels at current
rates, IPCC expected to say, according to mainsteam media reports that
cherry pick the most alarming predictions and fail to highlight the
vagueness introduced by words and phrases like 'might', 'could',
possibly', and 'in the worst case'.
Flooding, dangerous heatwaves, ill health and violent conflicts are
among the likely risks if temperatures exceed 2C above pre-industrial
levels, the report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
will say. In other words prety normal bad weather events of they kind
recordeed by diarists, commentators and chroniclers since writing was
invented sometime between 5 and 10 thousand years ago, and by students
of weather and climate for the past 200 years.
Warming beyond 4C would likely result in “substantial species
extinction, large risks to global and regional food security, impacts on
normal human activities” the report screams in alarm without mentioning
that in the last hundred and fifty years mean temperatures have risen
less than one degree centigrade.
The final document, which appears to have been rewritten line-by-line
by international government (? When did we get a world Government>)
officials at a summit in Copenhagen, is intended to provide an excuse to impose punitive taxes on the most essential items of expenditure the clearest and most concise summary yet of the widely debunked 'scientific consensus' on climate change.
How stupid is it to insist that global is all to do with CO 2 gas. No
one person seems to know where the big problem is. No amount of
decreasing CO 2 gas is going to make things better unless we all, in
North, South, East & West simply stop consuming (and the governments
and bankers fundung the Warmageddon scare don't want that as it would
trash the global economy which must achiever perpetual growth.
RELATED POSTS:
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism
Several times now it has looked as if the climate chance scare was over
as the enthusiasm of climate scitentists for changing real world data to
fit in with the predictions of their mathematical models has been
exposed. But as the scare was never about the environment, but was a
scam to redistribute wealth from rich to poor countries, the politicians
are throwing their propaganda budgets behind it again.
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]
Renewable Energy: So Useless That Even Green Loons At Google Have Given up on it
 Apart from the science related problems, this happens more often that greenies care to admit. The sandal wearing, tree hugging, bearded puritans of the Watermelon
tendency (green on the outside, red on the inside) call it "renewable
energy", the zealots of the Church Of Scienceology cal it sustainable
energy, those with smarter heads on their shoulder call it "alternative
energy" because that's what it really is: an alternative to energy that
actually works (eg nuclear and anything made from cabon-rich fuel from
organic matter laid down in pre-history and left to brew for a few
hundred million years.)
I'm sure the Warmageddonists will set up a right scream after reading
that paragraph, but a pair of top boffins hired at enormous expense by infra-green Google's research department have reached the same conclusion.
In The Register, Lewis Page reports Ross Konigstein and David Fork, both Stanford PhDs
(aerospace engineering; applied physics) were employed on a Google
research project which sought to enhance renewable technology to the
point where it could produce energy more cheaply than coal. But after
four years, the project was closed down. In this post at IEEE Spectrum they tell us why.
We came to the conclusion that even if Google and others had led
the way toward a wholesale adoption of renewable energy, that switch
would not have resulted in significant reductions of carbon dioxide
emissions. Trying to combat climate change exclusively with today’s
renewable energy technologies simply won’t work; we need a fundamentally
different approach.
Why is renewable energy such a total fail? Because, as the Google team explain to The RegisterThe Register explains in this report
on the same project, it is ludicrously inefficient, obscenely expensive
that if ever we were so foolish as to try rolling it out on a scale
beyond its current boutique levels, it would necessitate bankrupting the
global economy. Where Lewis does no go in that report from The
Register, is the enormous environmental damage done by 'cleaan, green
energy'. The huge rafts of concrete required as foundations for 2MW wind
turbines disrupt natural drainage patterns and make areas susceptible
to flash floods, while covering vast acreages in mirrors for solar power
while scientists are screaming (falsely) about the need to switch to
Genetically Modified crops to feed the world's hungry.
Let's deal with the fallacies in left wing propaganda there. In fact
we do not need GM crops because a) they don't produce significantly
greater yields without massive irrigation (in a world where water
shortage is increasingly a problem) and expensive special fetilizers
(which third world farmers can't affort) and b) North American and
European governments have for decades been paying farmers not to grow
food; anyone remember the European Union butter and grain mountains or
the milk lake and olive oil lake? Or the character in Joseph Heller's
Catch 22 whose father had grown rich from what the government paid him
to not grow certain crops?
But one insanity at a time, back to renewable energy which in a
nutshell, is uneconomical because so much equipment is needed to make it
work - steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium,
shipping and haulage - that it very likely uses up more energy than it
actually produces. It is also unreliable because as I keep explaining to
the Warmageddonists, Wind Turbines cannot generate power when the wind does not blow
and solar panels cannot generate power when the sun is down (on
average, over the course of a year, 12 hours a day, anywhere on the
globe.
Yet still our political class and the scientific whores who serve
them (science was ever fascism's whore) remains committed to the fantasy
that the emperor's new green clothes are absolutely wonderful. Earlier
this week, for example, the British government chucked £720 million of
taxpayers' money into an EU / United Nations fronted cesspit labelled
the Green Climate Fund.
In theory this initiative is supposed to help Third World countries
cope with the effects of climate change. In reality, all it will do is
force on their struggling economies more of the costly, intermittent
renewable technologies (wind turbines; solar; etc) which have proved
such a disaster for the advanced Western economies (Germany,
Netherlands, Spain and Denmark have now abandoned their plans to switch
totally to green energy. Spain is reliant on France's nulclear power stations,
Denmark relies on Germany's coal generating plants while Germany is
dangerously dependent on Russian gas for a nation involved in Obama's
economic war on Russia.
RELATED POSTS:
Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Another respected scientist comes out and denounces the science behind
the climate change scare as a fraud. The whole thing has been a scam to
justify punitive taxes on fuel and enable the rich to make fortunes
trading carbon credits. Again it shows what a sack of rogues the climate
science community really are.
Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*
I've had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have
been saying that if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related
activites the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would
all burn. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying
was "after dinner". Then it goT to "Tomorrow ...... or the day after
tomorrow perhaps," then "next year", "before 2050," and eventually
"soon."
Climate Change: reality versus IPCC scaremongering
Climate change and the trillion dollar geoengineering scam
Mainsteam media lies misrepresenting climate change
What happened to the missing fifty million climate refugees
Is climate change part of an American world domination agenda
Climate Change: CO2 Is Less Significant Than An Ant's Fart
by Arthur Foxake - 9 November, 2014
I believe it was in the BBC TV wildlife programme Life in the Undergrowth
(2005 - still available on DVD) in which the saintly David Attenborough
reveals that the world's termites emit 1500 times as much CO2 as the
entire human race including all industry. Surely it would be easier to
wipe out 0.06% of the termites to balance things up and finally prove
the Warmageddonists wrong.
Sorry folks, global warming like everything today, is a political
played simultaneously at national, international, inter-religion,
intra-religion, inter-bloc, inter-racial and more. The prize is control.
When Mr ban Ki Moon, loking bewildered as usual, reads words written
for him by globalist bureaucrats, he is just acting as a front man for
the game's sponsors. Let's stop all these useless conferences and simply
agree to respect this planet that gives us food, water, and all we need
and supplies a few fun items too.
The goal of We The People should be to live good lives and leave
behind us a place that, if not better, is at least as good as the one we
inherited from our ancestors. Life is not about being profit centres
for commerical organisations. If we ignore all the rhetoric, propaganda
and advertising puff, we will discover that eralier generations managed
quite well without the internet, iPads, Smartphones, Plasma TVs and all
the rest of the bollocks that is supposed to have improved our lives. In
fact such evidence as is available from the era before public opinion
polling was around to tell people what their opinions were, people were
actually happier and more fulfilled.
It is time to tell the bankers and businessment, the political
leaders and the armies of academics, public relatioins consultants and
assorted 'experts' who advise them, including religious heads,
bewildered international bureaucrats and other elitists that time is
running out for them.
Still, fair play to the Warmagedonists and their junk science. They
do not give up and never let little things like empirical evidence or
reality get in the way of their evangelical desire to plunge us all back
into a world of medieval technology. And now the ignorant arrogant
idiots think they can challenge nature, they are our modern day King
Canutes, fraudsters and charlatans the lot of them, I'll give them a
simple challenge to show if they are right or wrong, exactly how much
snow will the UK get over the next 6 months, if their models are correct
they should be able to give us an answer within several cm's and gain
our confidence.
Even if it were all true, Britain only contributes 1% of the world's
carbon emissions, but it is the ordinary British public who are
suffering the most as green levies on energy bills force poor households
to choose between eating and heating ( while China build 10 new coal
burning power stations a year). Like that ebola crises in Africa, it is
manufactured scaremongring designed to frighten us all into tolerating
further attacks on our individual freedoms but in reality it has little
to do with us. Our control freak government cannot bear to be left out
of any globalist move to curtail the rights of the individual.
The Wonderful, Climate Science Defying Vikings
One of the most repeated lies of the whole Warmageddonist scare is
that never in human history has the atmosphere been this warm before
(forget the Medieval Warm Period, it was all due to peasants burning
hockey sticks ... or something. And yet the 'Vikings', so often
dismissed by history as ignorant, hairy, horny drunks who terrorised
civilisation in Western Europe as they raided in their Longboats (A
beautifully designed vessel), raping, pillaging and plundering.
The academic community stick together of course, so today's children
do not hear about Vikings Eric Dorvaldsson (Eric the Red 950 to 1003AD)
who set out for fabled lands to the North West of Scotland and came upon
Iceland. The climate there was more benign than it is today and he
established communities. He then duly set out west again, following the
advice of The Pet Shop Boys song and came upon Greenland (which he
dubbed Vinland). It had a lot less ice than nowadays and Erik
established farming communities, remains of which have been found under
the recently melted ice.
Eric used to be considered by historians as the first 'Real Estate
Con Artist'. Calling his newly discovered landmass 'Greenland' to
encourage settlers. The remains of the farming communities give
credence to his sales glossies however. His son Leif (Eriksson), in
about 1000AD, headed west again, landed in Canada and settled a colony
there (Norse settlement at L’Anse aux Meadows, at the northernmost tip
of Newfoundland) where they grew oats and barley and turnips. The colony
did not last, leaving after about 3 years, having had a falling out
(over longship parking spaces?) with the locals.
The evidence, the real evidence, not the mathematical modelling,
suggests it was warmer then than now, which ties in with the conclusion I
reached a few years ago while looking at the neolithic village of Scara
Brae, the ancient (3000BC) Stone Age Settlement in Orkney. Rain lashed
across the site and an icy wind blew in from The Atlantic, having not
encountered so much as a small hill or even a clump of trees on its way
from The North Pole.
Anyone who lived there for any length of time would need more
fortitude than I and probably you possess. A similar conclusion reached
by Simon Schama in his 'History or Britain' DVD Series which toured the
site. It may be accepted that our ancestors were considerably more
durable that modern generations but even so, to not only survive but
manage to successfully begin cultivating crops in these hostile
environments without the aid of modern energy generation, technology and
clothing would have been almost impossible unless the climate was
considerably warmer at the time.
Global Warming therefore does not appear directly related to the
current pronouncement of the UN, Greenhouse Gas Content being the
highest in the last 800,000 years.
Science Fraud And The Climate Perpetual Motion Engine
Xavier Connolly
The IPCC claims are baseless. The clue is Figure 2.5 of Houghton's 'Physics of Atmospheres'.
For the surface to be part of the radiation transfer chain in the
atmosphere, it would have to be significantly warmer than the local
atmosphere.Using 0.75 atmospheric absorptivity, 16 deg C surface, to
transfer 160 W/m^2 by IR to the local atmosphere, it must be just below 0
deg C. In reality, it is kept very near surface temperature by
convection maintaining lapse rate.
Bottom line: according Houghton's grey body atmosphere assumption,
there is near zero, nada, zilch IR energy transfer from the surface to
the atmosphere. This disproves the most basic claim of the IPCC's
pseudoscience! The IPCC co-founder supports its fake science when he
published the real science in 1977.
This stinks: pass it on so we can get an official investigation.
The real atmosphere is semi-transparent; hence 63 W/m^2 net IR
transfer from the surface, 40 to Space, 23 weakly-absorbed H2O bands ~2
km absorption depth.
No professional pysicist or engineer accepts the Perpetual Motion
Machine of the 2nd Kind in the IPCC models, nor the final cheat GISS hid
from you for 33 years! The PMM is easily proved. To imaginary 333 W/m^2
'back radiation' is added 238.5 W/m^2 Solar energy. 238.5 W/m^2 leaves
as Outgoing Long Wave Radiation. As modellers assume OLR comes from a
separate -18 deg C zone, radiating up and down, the '2-stream' thermal
balance is 238.5 + 333 - 238.5 = 333 W/m^2.
The 40% extra, 94.5 W/m^2 is supposed to go mainly into oceans,
slight increase of Sea Surface Temperature heating the atmosphere. More
evaporation, higher humidity, absorbs more surface IR, giving more 'back
radiation'; amplification.
But more evaporation requires higher SST than real. They fixed this
by using in 'hind-casting' to past temperatures about 35% more low level
cloud albedo than reality. This makes the underneath of clouds cooler.
Evaporation is non linear, the models pretend average temperatures are
correct but much more evaporation in the sunlit regions gives the
imaginary increase in humidity.
Whoever programmed this cheat was clever because with correct IR
physics, there is no net surface IR in the main GHG bands, no
amplification; atmospheric processes make residual CO2-AGW near zero.
There is no problem from warming or ocean acidification; they coped with
12x present [CO2] levels in the past.
The evidence is no lower atmosphere warming for 18 years; no 'missing
heat'. The person who caused this mess was Carl Sagan who misled US
atmospheric Science. Over here, Houghton whose treatise 'Physics of
Atmospheres', Fig. 2.5. shows why Sagan was wrong to believe Arrhenius,
has pushed that scam by his support for the IPCC. The bottom line:
Climat science alarmists are fraudsters.
Anyone who bothers to look at the real world data on climate would
never suspect that CO2 has ever played a role in changing Earth's
climate over geologic time.
The IPCC continues to sound the same old boring climate alarmism
based on climate models. But there is actually no real evidence to
support a coming climate catastrophe. Natural climate variability has
always been responsible for Earth's changing climate.
The slight increase in global average temperature since the 1800s is
in line with natural climate variability. It is absolutely impossible
for human-activity CO2, which is only responsible for about 0.12% of the
greenhouse effect, to be causing dangerous global warming or to be the
key driver of climate change. It is simply incompatible with the
overwhelming body of scientific literature on natural climate
variability.
RELATED POSTS:
Climate alarmists cheating?
Climate Science Fraud: Feynman Said ...
by Godel's New best Friend
The physicist Richard Feynman said that it doesn't matter how smart
or powerful you are, if your hypothesis is contradicted by the empirical
data, you need a new hypothesis. The anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
hypothesis claims that the increasing level of carbon dioxide (co2) due
to human activities causes global warming. However, there is no
evidence linking co2 increase to global warming. During the past few
decades, as co2 continually increased, there have been both cooling and
warming periods. In fact, with co2 at its highest level in a very long
time, there’s been no additional increase in global temperature for
almost two decades. The co2 level has been steadily increasing since the
mid 1800s. Also, the science is clear that co2 ability to contribute to
warming diminishes as its level increases. An old experiment which
showed increased temperature by adding more co2 to an enclosed container
is hardly adequate for making assumptions about weather related
activities in the open atmosphere.
Take the lie, "The "seas are rising!". The seas have been rising for
the past 18,000 years, since the last (real) ice age began melting
(except possibly for a few hundred years of reversal during the more
recent Little Ice Age). Sea level has risen 400+ feet. The current
annual sea level rise is a miniscule 1 to 3 mm per YEAR! (1 mm =
.0393701 inches.) The rate of increase has been diminishing for the past
several thousand years.
Some perspective helps. There have been 13 ice ages in the past 1.3
million years, average duration of each being 90,000 years. Each ice age
was followed by a warming period, (commonly called an interglacial
period, such as the one we now enjoy) average duration 10,000 years.
When there is no further increase in sea level and when glaciers are no
longer shrinking, it’s a good bet that the next
ice age or, at least a Little Ice Age, is underway. (Neither is
desirable, even for the very adaptable human species.)
Actual data clearly demonstrates that extreme weather events
(typhoons, hurricanes, tornados, floods, droughts) have been less
frequent and less severe during the past few decades. The only
conclusion which can be drawn from this is that weather is more pleasant
when the earth is warmer. Even most scientists who otherwise back AGW
are embarrassed by the un-informed folks who continue to blame these
common weather events on human-caused global warming. The UN’s IPCC,
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in its most recent report,
admitted there is no indication that co2 level has any impact on our
climate insofar as bizarre weather events.
The IPCC has also now finally recognizes (once again !) that our
global temperature is a record level over the past 800 years. That
declaration is a back-handed admission that the Medieval Warming Period
(MWP) was both a global event and warmer than now. No surprise, since
there have been numerous studies from around the globe confirming this.
If there is some ambiguity between the IPCC actual report and its
“summary” report, keep in mind that funding for the IPCC would instantly
disappear if it had identified our current warming as merely
natural climate variation.
Clearly human activity was not responsible for climate during the
MWP. At that time the co2 level was constant (and lower, around 280
ppmv.) What’s more, the earlier warming periods during this
interglacial, before the MWP, were at even higher temperatures. So our
current warming is well within the bounds of natural climate variation.
The beginning of our current warming (such as it is) is invariably
associated with
the beginning of the industrial revolution (mid 1800s) and the
associated rise
in co2 level. But there is no justification for that cherry-picked
start-date. Our current warming actually began, by definition, at the
bottom (the low temperature) of the Little Ice Age, which took place
during the mid 1600s. That implies
two centuries of natural warming BEFORE the industrial revolution and
before co2
began to increase.
The only known correlation between global temperature and co2
variation is over geologic periods and during that era temperature
variations always occurred first, and were reflected hundreds of years
later, by similar variations in co2 level. That is the carbon cycle at
work. Because of oceans’ much greater heat capacity than the atmosphere
oceans cool and warm much more slowly. Oceans outgas when warmer, and
absorb gas when cooler. Notice that the two recent periods of cooling or
flat temperature both cover significantly longer durations than was
needed for alarmists to claim the warming is due to human activity.
Nonetheless those same alarmists now argue that two decades of
temperature “hiatus” is not long enough to refute the AGW hypothesis.
There is no indication that increasing co2 has ever had any impact on
global temperature, and in the more distant past co2 has been 10 to 20
times higher than now. Co2 has also been much higher during two ice ages
and going into once ice age, so neither does there appear to be any
nearby “trigger”.
Is the greenhouse gas theory applicable to our atmosphere? The
barriers in a real greenhouse confine heat much more effectively than
our open atmosphere and satellite measurements show that heat is
escaping to space.
All the computer models projecting global warming assume that the
real greenhouse gas culprit is water vapor. Water vapor, according to
the models’ authors, supposedly provides a positive feedback, bringing
on temperature increases 2 to 3 times greater than was brought on by
increasing co2. But the feedback assumption is speculative at best
because NO ONE yet understands climate feedbacks. In fact, cloud cover,
one aspect of water vapor, likely provides a negative (offsetting)
feedback. Sufficient time has now passed to show that practically every
imaginable computer model scenario has grossly over-estimated actual
temperature increase. In any case, computer model output is NOT evidence
of anything apart from demonstrating the understanding, and agenda or
confirmation bias of its authors!
Co2 is a trace gas, and represents 4/100 of one percent, by volume,
of the atmosphere. This is also referred to as 400 parts per million by
volume (ppmv), or .0004. The recent average annual increase in co2 is
about 2 ppmv (.000002).
The administration is promising to reduce US emissions by 17% over the
next several years. But the economic analysis, using the alarmists’ own
numbers, indicates that the cost to our economy (which does not take
into account the impact on other countries) would be enormous, and, even
assuming success, would have an impact on temperature too miniscule to
even measure. Such a policy is likely to lead to a massive disruption -
hundreds of billions (if not trillions) in cost and NO IMPROVEMENT! This
has to be obvious to everyone but rent-seekers.
There has not been even one coherent attempt at rebuttal of the
issues raised herein In fact, many of the alarmists still deny that
global temperature has stalled or that bizarre weather is still natural
climate variation. So far the only response to questions or criticism of
AGW involve circular logic, name-calling, "appeals to authority"
(hardly relevant when it is “authority” which is in question),
“consensus” claims, or that the science is “settled”. Michael Mann
(infamous "hockey stickgraph" author) responds to scientific criticisms
by ignoring the facts presented, and instead asks whether the reader
prefers to have their gall bladder taken out by a dentist rather than a
surgeon. Science is never settled and certainly not decided by votes.
The “consensus” claims are invariably based on completely debunked
surveys. In any other situation such ‘consensus” studies would have
long-since been exposed as major embarrassments for both the authors and
the involved institutions.
It is clear that human activity is contributing to the increase in
carbon dioxide. However, some perspective, again, is needed. By 2099 the
co2 level is projected to reach 600 ppmv (this assumes a continuation
of the annual increase of 2ppmv per year). A crowded gym with poor
venting is likely to be at 1,000 ppmv. Submarine crews work, for months,
in atmospheres of 3,000 to 5,000+ ppmv. Plants LOVE the increased co2
level and, in that environment, require less water and will provide more
oxygen. Scientists have also acknowledged that lifeforms not unlike our
own survived in co2 levels which were many times higher than now. Some
scientists have concluded that the optimum level for co2 would be about 4
times higher than it is now.
Skeptics of these alarmist claims are at least as interested in
saving the planet as the alarmists – we have grandchildren too. There is
time, and technology will likely come up with sensible solutions long
before the co2 level becomes a problem. In the meantime, we will all
enjoy a healthier environment. Invoking the “precautionary principle” to
address an implausible hypothesis would likely bring on catastrophic
economic results. Do not permit the politicians and alarmists to
foist this hobgoblin on us!
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Climate Change Scam: Green energy costs 'far higher than ministers admit'
How long have our family of blogs and websites been telling you Global
Warming / climate change was a scam, a load of pseudo scienfific
scaremongering generated by charlatans in the service of their political
clients and a globalist agenda. It seems almost every day now we are
reporting another reputable scientist or organisation coming over to our
side. A new report published today exposes government . academic lies
about the cost of green power ...
Will New German Study End Global Warming Hysteria?
Although evidence that the global warming scare has been a massive scam
in which exponents of various typoes of dodgy science lumped together
under the label of climate science, in order to justify massive taxes on
everything (because everything in the modern economy involves oil or
electricity at some stage) and create a $1trillion per year market for
Inventment Bankers and Dr. Evil types such as Al Gore could steal more
money from ordinary people, politicians, media contributors and of
course science academics have stuck to the narrative.
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad]
Bad News for the alarmists: 'Missing Heat' from Non-Existent 'Global Warming' isn't Hiding in the Ocean After All
by Xavier Connolly - 7 October, 2014
 Stranded? Eff off - I'm looking for the missing heat the climate models say is here" ( Source) The already mortaly wounded cause of climate taxes
alarmism has bean dealt another blow in a new study published by a NASA
research project carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
Pasadena, USA.
Satellite observations and empirical measurements gathered by Argo temperature probes enabled the NASA team to calculate temperature variations and thermal expansion in ocean waters over 6000 feet deep.
They found that contrary to the 'scientific consensus' that global
warming apparently stopped 18 years ago because the missing heat
predicted by computer models had been absorbed by the deep oceans,
according to the new study the depths have not warmed significantly for
ten years.
This presents zealots for the religion of virtual reality with a big
problem; the "missing heat" was, they assured us, hiding in the deep
oceans, because their infallible mathematical models of the ecosphere
said it must be somewhere. This has been their favourite get out when
presented with scientificlly rigourous proof that the real world global
mean temperature ("global warming") has been static the past 18 years.
NASA Study Finds Earth's Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed
The cold waters of Earth's deep ocean have not warmed measurably
since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery
of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years.
Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena,
California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from
2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters)
has not warmed measurably. Study coauthor Josh Willis of JPL said these
findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself.
"The sea level is still rising," Willis noted. "We're just trying to understand the nitty-gritty details."
In the 21st century, greenhouse gases have continued to accumulate in
the atmosphere, just as they did in the 20th century, but global
average surface air temperatures have stopped rising in tandem with the
gases. The temperature of the top half of the world's ocean -- above the
1.24-mile mark -- is still climbing, but not fast enough to account for
the stalled air temperatures.
Many processes on land, air and sea have been invoked to explain what
is happening to the "missing" heat. One of the most prominent ideas is
that the bottom half of the ocean is taking up the slack, but supporting
evidence is slim. This latest study is the first to test the idea using
satellite observations, as well as direct temperature measurements of
the upper ocean. Scientists have been taking the temperature of the top
half of the ocean directly since 2005, using a network of 3,000 floating
temperature probes called the Argo array.
"The deep parts of the ocean are harder to measure," said JPL's
William Llovel, lead author of the study, published Sunday, Oct. 5 in
the journal Nature Climate Change. "The combination of satellite and
direct temperature data gives us a glimpse of how much sea level rise is
due to deep warming. The answer is -- not much."
The study took advantage of the fact that water expands as it gets
warmer. The sea level is rising because of this expansion and water
added by glacier and ice sheet melt.
Continue reading the NASA report:
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Earth’s CO2 Levels Pass Global Warming ‘Milestone', Nothing Happens - Daily Caller.
After
two decades of panic stricken scientists and screeching lefties wailing
about the catatrophe that would ensue once the concentration of carbon
dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere passed 400 parts per million, that
figure was reached in December 2014.
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad]
BH endorsed by Skeptical Science
Barry Woods points me to this Skeptical Science thread (reproduced at Brandon's site), in which yours truly is discussed.
Climate Change is Not Our Fault, So Let’s Just Deal With It, says California Professor
Once again its time to say I told you so. Sciencology cult followers
will no doubt say "Once report does not prove your case. That is exactly
what they have said in response to all the hunreds of other properly
set up scientific studies that have said the same. All I can say to them
is if one repost does not prove our case, how come one hockey stick is
supposed to prove theirs?
from National Parks Traveller
Climate Is Changing, And Some Parks Are Endangered, But Humans Aren't The Cause - Daniel Botkin
Climate change is happening – but not because of human activity,
Daniel Botkin, professor Emeritus in the Department of Ecology,
Evolution, and Marine Biology at University of California Santa Barbara
has said. Moreover, the focus on man-made global warming is detracting
attention from real environmental disasters to nature’s detriment, he
has argued.
Botkin challenges the conclusions reached by the Union of Concerned
Scientists in their paper National Landmarks at Risk, How Rising Seas,
Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished
Historic Sites, not least because they’ve taken the standard reports
from the IPCC and others, “treating them as accurate and true,” and then
used those results to look at the possible outcome for various national
parks.
“The point of the report, its opening theme and its major conclusion,
is that these historic places are in trouble and it’s our fault, we
have been the bad guys interfering with nature and therefore damaging
places we value,” Botkin says, before methodically knocking down each
assertion as demonstrably false.
Climate models linking human CO2 output to rising temperatures are
unreliable, he writes. “Conclusion: our addition of carbon dioxide to
the atmosphere does not appear to be increasing Earth’s temperature.
Whatever is happening to Earth’s climate does not seem to be our fault.”
However, he does acknowledge that climate change is happening. Taking
sea level as an example, he says: “the sea level has been rising since
the end of the last Ice Age, starting about 14,000 years ago as the
continental and mountain glaciers have melted and sea water has expanded
with the overall warming. The average rate has been about a foot or two
a century”.
The question he poses is: what to do about it? Rather than spending
time arguing over the causes of climate change, Botkin advocates simply
rolling up our sleeves and dealing with the outcome, harking back to
Frederick Law Olmstead, who in the mid 1800s, created the Back Bay Fens
on Boston’s shoreline as a way to manage both ocean floods, deal with
waste water for the city, and create a recreational area for city
dwellers.
“Confronted with the combined problems of ocean surges and flooding
from river runoff inland, Olmsted did not waste his time complaining
about whether or not people have caused the problem. He just set out and
solved it.”
However, he saves his most damning criticism for the UCS’s treatment
of wildfire frequency. The report claims two national park sites are at
particular risk of damage from increasingly frequent wildfires, despite
the fact that the evidence shows no increase.
“Furthermore”, he writes, “it is well-established that most major
wildfires that occur these days are from the failure to allow much more
frequent, and therefore light fires, to burn. The 20th century policy
dominated by Smokey Bear — “only you can prevent forest fires” — and the
belief, ill-founded, that all forest and grassland fires are bad and
must be prevented — have had a damaging effect.”
‘Damaging’ is an understatement – in fact, the policy caused the
extinction of Kirtland’s warbler, a bird which nests in young jack
pines, which only regenerate after a fire.
RELATED POSTS:
Meteorologists Begin To Admit To Climate Engineering
The freethinkers and Libertarians of New Media have been questioning the
pseudoscientific certainties of the global warming lobby for a long
time. During that often acrimonious process (because the Global Warming
lobby are ever bit as organised and as driven by blind hatred of those
who question them as the Bearded Queens In Bridal Gowns lobby) and most
of us have been accused of infanticide, genocide and worse. At last the
respectable climate scientists (the ones who didn't sell their arse for
the corporate dollar) are speaking, and the media are listening.
The cheating of climate change alarmists exposed
Climate change cult followers still pushing the lies
The deception behind climate change Warmageddonism
Climate change, the economic reality of abandoning oil and coal
How we need climate change to drive evolution
IPCC Climate change scaremongering geopolitical agenda
The missing 50 million climate change refugees
Climate activists Claim US Deep Freeze Is Due To Global Warming
Kit Daniels, Prison Planet
As 44 US states brace for snow
in the coming week, multiple “climate change” articles have been
published recently which attempt to attribute the record cold – or any
change in climate for that matter – to “global warming.”
An op/ed published yesterday, for example, suggested the freezing temperatures throughout the U.S. are an “indirect result of the world getting warmer.”
“Global warming could be making parts of the world colder,” the
author claimed, even though the phrase “global warming” refers to the
entire world getting warmer, not just specific parts of it.
The author even attributed the record-level ice in Antarctica to “global warming.”
“Warmer temperatures are not only causing more snowfall in
Antarctica, scientists believe, but could also be producing more sea
ice,” he stated.
The op/ed did not resonate well with readers.
“These so called experts haven’t a clue what is going on, but
politicians know exactly what is happening – the greatest opportunity to
control the masses ever presented,” one reader, Steve Nosympathy,
commented. “Never before has such an opportunity presented where the
government can steal huge amounts from the public by instilling fear.”
A similar article published today by The Energy Collective blamed “global warming” for “extreme weather.”
“Global warming is worsening,” the article harked. “It seems that new
reports appear with increasing frequency emphasizing the worsening of
global warming due to increased accumulation of manmade greenhouse gases
(GHGs) in the atmosphere.”
“They show that extreme weather or climate events already appear to
be more severe and/or frequent than in the past, and will continue to
worsen.”
Of course, none of this corresponds to what the largest proponent of global warming, Al Gore, has said in the past.
“…Science is warning us that if we do not quickly reduce the global
warming pollution that is trapping so much of the heat our planet
normally radiates back out of the atmosphere, we are in danger of
creating a permanent ‘carbon summer,’” Gore proclaimed during his Nobel Lecture in 2007.
He also famously predicted the North Pole would be ice-free by 2013, but instead ice sheets expanded to record levels that year.
“Satellite photos of the Arctic taken by NASA in August 2012 and
August 2013 show a 60 percent increase in the polar ice sheet, more than
half the size of Europe, despite ‘realistic’ predictions by climate
scientists six years ago that the North Pole would be completely melted
by now,” reported CNS News.
It’s hilarious that climate activists claim the “science is settled”
and “global warming is real” yet over and over again their predictions
are proven patently false.
CREATIVE COMMONS: attrib, no comm, no dervs.
KEYWORDS: news, opinion, dailystirrer,
If you liked this, please give it a boost
Close Window and return to previous URL
Skip RSS Feeds and go to Greenteeth Menu Panel
|
SITE SEARCH
find keywords on
this domain
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit
INFORMATION
NAVIGATION
navigate
Greenteeth Digital Piblishing
MAIN CATEGORIES
Daily Stirrer pages
Fiction
Animal related
Art Menu
America:
Belief, Faith and Religion
Big Data And The Surveillance State
Catalogue of the Bizarre
Our posts on the Brexit saga
Celebrity mocking and knocking
Climate and Environment
Comedy, Satire, Humour
Coronavirus fear and panic
Debt Crisis and Money Matters
Driven To Drink
Europe index of posts
Posts on far east
The trade and commerce catalogue page
Germany - index of posts
EU Immigration crisis
Cultiral Clash - Islam Versus Multiculturalism
Education Menu
Fear and Panic
Globalisation - the enemy of freedom
Geoengineering: Science versus Humanity
Health Menu
History - new perspectives
Immigration crisis
Humanitas
ISIS and the Middle East War
Jobs Crisis
Recommended Reading
Living Within The conspiracy
>
Middle East
Nanny State and The Thought Police
Past Perspectives
The Pandemic of Pandemics
Philo & Sophia
Politically Correct Stupidity
Fools & Dreamers
Politics and Economy
Science and Technology
Sex and sexuality
Sport
Syria -learn what really happened (catalogue)
UK politics
Weird and Supernatural
World Politics
SNACKS (sub topics)
The Ageing population
age
Religion and spirituality
Climate Change
Comedy and Humour
Education is overrated
The environment
Europe
Health
Internet Technology
Jobs and employment
Money and finance
Myths and traditions
Nanny Orwell
People and Places
Science, technology
Society
UK politics
War
World Politics
Our Internet Places
Scribd
Blogster
Ed Butt at Bubblews
Wikinuts
Boggart Blog
Little Nicky Machiavelli
Boggart Network News
Greenteeth Bites
Greenboggart
Boggart Blog Central
Daily Stirrer briefing
Boggart Network News
BOGGART BLOG ARCHIVES
BBselect001
BBselect002
BBselect003
BBselect004
BBselect005
BBselect006
MULTI MEDIA
Spoken Word
Video
Music
Graphic Art
|
More From Around The Labyrinth
|
