climate-lies-omnibus-daily-stirrer-dailystirrer

British Democracy In Terminal Decline - Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year - And things are worse elsewhere.

by Ian R Thorpe
When we first started Stirring things back in 2005 with a blog called Little Nicky Mchiavelli, we were pretty much out on a limb in opposing the 'scientific consensus' that Carbon Dioxide from human activity was driving climate change. The balance has been shifting for some time and now even mainstream media is coming to understand that the people who claimed 'the science is settled' were not scientists but lobbyists for a corporate agenda.

Forget The Hype About COP26 Saving The Planet, Here's The Reality
Continue reading >>>

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures
We have previously highlighted this report from Finland which exposes the great flaw in "the science" of global warming. The link at the end of this extract takes you to a much more complete account of the research project which, not for the first time debunks the fake science on which the politically - motivate climate change scare.
Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

Back to menu

California’s Left Wing Governor Implies People Need To Be Brainwashed Into Believing In Climate Change

from: American Lookout, 7 November 2017

Climate change is like a religion for the left. California’s far left governor Jerry Brown recently proved it by suggesting Americans need brain washing to believe in it.

The Sacramento Bee reports:

World needs ‘brain washing’ on climate change, Jerry Brown says at Vatican Gov. Jerry Brown challenged the world’s religious leaders to further engage as he minimized the negative effects of President Donald Trump on meeting the climate-change challenge. “The Trump factor is very small, very small indeed,” in comparison to the commitments taking place around the world, Brown said to a burst of applause Saturday at an event organized by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences. “That’s nothing to cheer about, because if it was only Trump that was a problem, we’d have it solved. But that’s not our only problem. "The problem … is us. It’s our whole way of life. It’s our comfort … It’s the greed. It’s the indulgence. It’s the pattern. And it’s the inertia."
Brown, who arrived Friday for nearly two weeks of climate talks across Europe, said the path to transformational change must include the mass mobilization of the religious and theological sphere, but also the prophetic sphere…
"At the highest circles, people still don’t get it," he said. "It’s not just a light rinse that’s required. We need a total, I might say ‘brain washing.’ "We need to wash our brains out and see a very different kind of world."

That sounds like the words of a concerned citizen of course until you remembr this superannuated hippy's nickname throughout the USA is "Governor Moonbeam and he presides over a state where non humans and even on mammals have, with the help of liberasl lawyers and 'liberal' laws backed by the state legislature have successfully sued those who violated their "human rights," where in criminal cases having dark skin is considered proof of innocence and which is at the forefront of the campaign to win equal rights for paedophiles.

Back to menu

Climate Change: Is There A Holy Grail Of Sustainable Energy Sources

We have wriiten long and eloquently on the push to switch the world from fossil fuels to "sustainables"; Xavier Connolly, our science and engineering specialist has debunked the claims of warmageddonists about the threat posed by Carbon Dioxide, Phil T Looker has exposed the crazy-farm economics of the anti - carbon brigade and the editor (and site owner) Ian has demolished the hype around wind and solar (and in fairness has praised other technolgies that would work but don't fullfil the Warmagedonnists globalist agenda.)

It seem the message is sinking in at last about the favoured sustainables, wind and solar generators. Nothing wrong with these technologies of course, except that the wind does not blow consistently twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, and the sun absolutely refuses to shine all around the clock. Some may curse the sun for this but we think it is something to do with the earth being an approximate sphere.

The latest folly it seems is the rush to develop battery technology that can sustain power supplies to a large population, industrialised nation when the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow. And as usual the world's leading exponent of technobullsit, elon Musk of Tesla Cars is in the forefront.

In February of this year, AES Energy’s Escondido battery storage facility in California was hailed as the largest battery cluster to date, with a capacity of 30 MW/120 MWh. This is paltry when we consider the needs of a modern city.

Now however, Tesla is building a bigger one—100 MW/129 MWh—in Australia. It seems like the race to build ~~a better mousetrap~~ bigger battery storage system is well and truly on. But is there to it than that?

Is the race for truly reliable, grid-scale, quick-to-install energy storage solutions that will make the shift to all-renewable power much more realistic. Or is the real goal something else? All the evidence to date suggests the race is to convince major governments that such a storage system will be available in the near future and thus get the $billions in public money that will be thrown at the company that succeeds in convincing politicians it can deliver.

California is one of the places to be if you’re a renewables fan. Well, it would be, wouldn't it? After all the state is the global capital of crazy. Its authorities have ambitious plans to lead the world in destroying Euro - American civilisation and returning to a medieval economy, eventually hoping to replace all fossil-fuel generation capacity with windmills. Wholly reliable grid-scale storage systems are crucial for this strategy, and they are becoming increasingly popular in the state.

Unfortunately, the initiative to make the 100-percent renewable plan a law fell through. Unions, worried about possible job losses, pulled their support. Legislators themselves tweaked the bill, so its goal is now to produce 100-percent greenhouse-gas-free energy. This can only be achieved by banning the manufacture of wind turbines, solar panels and lithium ion batteries in the state, thus shifting the carbon bigfootprint elsewhere. The debate about the feasibility of the plan and how fast it could become a reality is ongoing, but so far all attempts to prove the feasibility of a carbon free society have failed miserably. California is a cautionary tale for other ambitious clean energy proponents.

Meanwhile, the leaders of the battery pack, buoyed by government grants and subsidies, are expanding. AES recently teamed up with Siemens on a joint venture, Fluence, focusing specifically on energy storage system development.

Tesla is looking in another direction. It already has the largest portfolio of completed energy storage projects globally, at 300 MWh. What it is looking for now is integrating future storage systems with wind and solar electricity producers.

When Tesla said it had won a deal for the construction of the world’s biggest lithium-ion battery storage facility in Australia, it noted that the deal involves partnering with local wind power producer, Neoen, which will supply the battery complex with electricity.

At the same time, AES is working mainly with traditional utilities to supply them with energy storage capacity, focusing on constantly improving the energy density and efficiency of its arrays. Tesla’s all-renewables focus is well documented, and now could give it the lead in the energy storage race.

Earlier this month, Tesla closed another partnership, with wind power leader Vestas, to develop integrated wind power-energy storage solutions. The Danish company announced earlier this year that it has big plans for energy storage, with Chairman Bert Nordberg telling Reuters that the company had 3.2 billion euro (US$3.84 billion) in cash and no debt, so it could afford some good investments. So far this year, Vestas has invested in almost a dozen battery storage makers.

Energy storage, according to AES’ CEO Andres Gluski, is “the Holy Grail for renewables.” It is the key to the renewables kingdom of the future, eliminating the adverse effects of renewable power’s intermittency. Integrating this Holy Grail with the clean energy producers is the next step. Tesla and other battery makers have already made it but realistically on a very small scale. Staying with traditional energy sources might not be a bad strategy for governments: once scientists and tech billionaires are honest enough to admit that producing and recycling lithium ion batteries is a filthy and (fossil fuel) energy hungry process that simply moves the pollution to third world nations, it may well be some considerable time before renewables become the predominant energy source in the world.

Back to menu

RELATED POSTS:

Will new clean energy process make coal the fuel of the future
Coal, you exclaim, throwing up your hands in horror, the stuff that covered buildings of industrial towns in black soot, the stuff that choked miners lungs and sent millions of people to early graves? Coal the filthiest fuel ever? How can you say it is clean? Well a new technology recently announced might change your mind. Unless you are a windmill worshipping Warmageddonist of course.

Warmageddonist Intolerance Increases As The 'Science' Their Case Was built On Collapses.
This publication has always denounced the scaremongering that surrounds the climate issue and the blatant lies being told by scientists and politicians. Even thoght the global mean temperature has not risen for hearly twenty years, climate scientists and green activists claim rate of increase is accelerating, catastrophe is almost upon us and huge tax increases are required. It's all bollocks of course, but that does not stop the witch hunts.

We were bullied into buying diesel cars to help the environment. Now experts admit this ‘green’ fuel is killing thousands of us
Remember all that fuss a few years ago about how much better for the environment it would be if we all drove diesel cars instead of petrol. As usual, the scientists couldn't see the smoke for the fumes and politicians only had the interests of oil companies and car makers in mind. Now it turns out diesel is worse for the envronment and our health after all. Now what did they call those of us who said that was the case all along? Conspiracy theorists or something.

Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?
When somebody who has been whining about Warmageddon and the CO2 effect that is killing life on earth for twenty years suddenly starts talking not about climate change, athropogenic global warming and the need for green solutions but the arrogance and greed of those in the green lobby, it's worth paying attention

Climate Predictions, Economics and Realities
As another blatant to the point of idiocy climate science fraud, the manipulation of temperature data to make real world observations agree with climate change predictions made by science is exposed we look at how over reliance on statistical projections and mathematical models has put scientists on a par with clowns in the public's estimation. Unfortunately scientists are more dangerous.

Biofuels - The Great Green Folly
As the promises that wind and solar power could meet all our energy needs is exposed as pseudo - scientific twaddle by the wind's refusal to blow steadily all the time and the sun's refusal to shine at night, few of the alternative energy sources hyped as a replacement for fossil fuels. Of those, biofuel looks the next most likely to say, "If you hadn't over hyped me I coulda been somebody, 'stead of a bum. I coulda been a contender.

HAARP: Scientists Open Pandora's Box With Experiments In Changing The Climate
What do you think of the freak weather this year? Coincidence, climate change, solar activity or something more sinister. If you have heard the term HAARP chances are you're pretty sceptical about the official line. HAARP - the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program is a research programme that experiments with changing the earh's upper atmosphere. you don't have to understand much science to realise it proves that as John Lennon said the world is run by insane people.

Big Green Versus Big Koch
As the war between scaremongering, Warmageddonist supporters of Big Green and the champions of level headed common sense and healthy scepticism becomes more and more reminiscent of the bloody civil war in Syria, The Daily Stirrer brings news of another defector from the climate science fascism camp. And this time it is a major front man of the global warming conspiracy.

Laundering Scientific FallaciesFrom climate change to economic chaos, experts can be relied on to get things wrong. Does spending too much time in universities make people stupid or does the computer science used to model reality for fail to distinguish between reality and wishful thinking? This analysis blows apart the business of laundering reality to mask the hoplessness of scientific predictions ...
Gas power stations are greener than wind for low carbon, Policy Exchange claims
Another "We told you so story for The Daily Stirrer. Building gas-fired power plants instead of more offshore wind farms could actually lead to greater carbon savings at a lower cost, a leading think-tank has claimed. In a report out today, Policy Exchange argued that the government should scrap 4GW of its planned 13GW target for ...

Spain dumps clean-energy subsidies; promptly watches the industry go down like a sinking ship
The news that Spain has dumped it's loonytoons green energy policy will surprise few people who have followed the wind turbine scam. Wind power as a source of energy is unreliable and inefficient and it was only in a fit of green socialist insanity Spain's previous government committed that beleagured nation to meeting the bulk of its energy needs from wind and sun powreed generators. The scientists who advised them forgot it oes dark for approximately half the time and the wind blows when it fels like blowing.

High Court Says Government's Green Energy OCD Does Not Override Natural Beauty
he Government feels compelled to boost the amount of energy from renewables as part of climate change targets imposed by Europe because of pledges that have no basis in law that were given by a previous government to the smooth faced unelected bureaucrats, the internationalist Nazis whose agenda aims to create a single European superstate as a stepping stone towards the establishment of ...

Electricity bills set to rise to pay for wind farm subsidies
While sensible people agree that the climate is causing serious problems few people still think this is due solely to CO2 emissions from human activity. Even the author of Gaia theory has said the problem is more complex. Unfortunately climate scientists with their snouts in the tax money trough are still pushing the discredited idea that wind turbines and solar panels can meet our energy needs. Well if that is the case why are domestic fuel bills rising to pay for subsidies paid to the operators of these failed technologies. [ also Daily Stirrer 21 May 2012 The Madness Of Carbon Accounting
The Government, along with the politically correct crazies of the Obama administration are claiming great triumphs in cutting crbon emissions even as they exhort us to buy more goods manufactured by carbon intensive processes to boost the failing domestic economies. Buit how are these cuts to emissions being achhieved and at what cost to the \economy and social fabric of western nations?

The Great Wind Turbine Con Trick
A detailed and damning critique of wind turbine technology, renewable energy scams, green lobbying, the dodgy science behind the case for sustainable power and the politicisation of concerns about the environment. The whole thing looks more and more like a confidence trick by academics, politicians, big business and the New World Order ...

Climate Change Menu Living Within The Conspiracy Science and Technology

Hurricane Harvey Climate Catastrophe Man Made?

As we reported last week the Hurricane Harvey disaster which has hit the U.S. states of Texas and Louisiana has shown characteristics never before observed in any hurricane or tropical storm since records began. Meteorological depressions (because that is what hurricanes, typhoons and other intense storms are,) move and once over land quickly weaken as air pressures become normalised. Harvey has stayed in the same area, dumping massive amounts of rain on the heavily populated coastal strip and causing Sbillionsworth of damage through flooding and high winds.

Some scientists have now joined the professional sceptics in questioning whether Harvey is the latest example of covert weather warfare being waged on completely unsuspecting populations. Such activity has been hinted at (but not proved conclusively) by leaked documents and whistleblowers, and is alleged to involve NASA and DARPA (the Defense advanced Research Projects Agency.) The existence of HAARP (High Auroral Atmospheric Research Project) in Alaska is now officially acknowledged and Freedom of Information laws have forced officials to admit experiments in weather control have been carried out. It is known that governments of Russia, China and Iran have conducted weather control programmes using technology based on the theories of Nikola Tesla

Increasingly catastrophic climate cataclysms appear to be orchestrated and manipulated by an ever more desperate and aggressive global power structure. Rapidly accelerating climate and biosphere collapse is not somewhere on the horizon, it is here, now. And it has little to do with Carbon Dioxide emissions. Attempts at Climate engineering (carried out by irresponsibe scientists who haven't a clue of the possible long term con sequences) are is further fueling the disintegration of the delicate structure that holds together the natural life support systems of our planet. With undeniable facts and film footage in the video below fully exposes the manipulation of Hurricane Harvey, starting from the fact that where hurricanes can usually be seen building out in mid Atlantic, this one appeared suddenly from nowhere.

Climate expert and passionate debunker of global warming theory Judith Curry says:
The 12 year drought of major hurricane landfalls in the U.S. is over, with catastrophic impacts in Texas. Predictions of Hurricane Harvey illustrate the realization of extended and long-range hurricane forecasts.

This blog post analyzes the forecasts of Hurricane Harvey made by my company Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN), and also by the National Hurricane Center. READ MORE >>>

It is worth noting that the first man-made climate disaster took place in Britain in 1952, when a flash flood claimed many lives in Lynmouth, small town in south west England. And the truth, that the British Defence Ministry had been conduction cloud seeding experiment on the uplands above the town prior to the flood did not emerge until fifty years later when, under UK laws, certain documents were de classified.

More bad news for warmists: NASA finds no retreat of polar ice

Twenty years ago people who call themselves 'scientists' (although eminent scientists including Richard Feynman and Michael Crichton have a few posthumous issues with that claim) began to predict that the polar ice caps were melting at an accelerating rate and rising sea levels would flood coastal cities The science is settled' they said. Scaremongering was always the best marketing tool for the the people who want to create a global government, and global warming (now revised to 'climate change as the globe has not warmed for a considerable time. It turned out that though the science was not settled, the ice is.

The scaremongering ploy failed too, many people decided the predictions of disaster were exaggerated and if the planet became two degrees hotter, that would be quite nice really. It should have been obvious even to scientists, who tend to be a bit thick when common sense is called for, that people prefer warm weather, and no part of the United States or Europe is in the tropics, where heat from global warming would be the most bothersome.

But the ice caps just didn't get the message, and, as we reported yesterday, the ice caps are just as thick as they were decades ago. Those poor polar bears photoshopped onto ice floes will be just fine, and the fifty million refugees it was predicted would be displaced by rising sea levels are comfy in their homes as life goes on in the usual way.

Now comes data from NASA, the space folks, who, when they are not touting the achievements of Muslim scientists, study climate change. Their data show that the extent, as well as the thickness, of the polar ice caps is unchanged. James Taylor of Forbes reports:

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth's polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede. ...

Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as "proof" of a global warming crisis.) ...

In late 2012, however, polar ice dramatically rebounded and quickly surpassed the post-1979 average. Ever since, the polar ice caps have been at a greater average extent than the post-1979 mean.

Now, in May 2015, the updated NASA data show polar sea ice is approximately 5 percent above the post-1979 average. During the modest decline in 2005 through 2012, the media presented a daily barrage of melting ice cap stories. Since the ice caps rebounded – and then some – how have the media reported the issue?

The answer, of course, is that mainstream media have indgnored these findings a continued to push the 'we're all going to fry / drown / be eaten by polar bears' narrative because the era we live in is one of controlled information (fake news) and political / corporate control freakery.

Back to menu

RELATED POSTS:

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed 'climate deniers' have been telling you for years ...

IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are stated to amount to £77 billion a year.

Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
Over the years my scepticism about global warming and attempts to initiate intellgent discussion of the dodgy science based on mathematical models that forms the basis of the Warmageddonist case, versus much less alarming projections based on data from real world observations haveearned me accusations of being a child murderer. Not only that, some of the lefties who support climate fascism have demanded the death penalty for people who disagree with them. And yet they think it unfair to punish certain child rapists and murderers. Hypocrites.

France Moves to Make ‘Conspiracy Theories’ Illegal by Government Decree
Political elites and super-bureaucrats must be very worried. New start up political parties, dismissed as populist byt in reality listening to the concerns of voters are making inroads into the political status quo. New media investigative journalists and op-ed writers are challenging the official propaganda (and gaining an ever bigger audience). It’s becoming harder to control consensus reality.

Temperature Was Not Rising But Climate Chief's Cock Was
RAJENDRA Pachauri, until this week one of the world’s most influential climate politicians, has been grounded in India and barred from the Delhi institute which provided the springboard for his chairmanship of the International Panel on Climate Change, as a third woman came forward alleging sexual harassment.

Climate Experts Smeared by Media and Greenpeace for Debunking Global Warming
Anyone who understood basic arithmetic (like how to work out an average) and took the trouble to examine the 'science' that backed the climate change scare understood the whole thing was a fraud. And plenty of honest scientists were not afraid to say so. But those who went public faced hate attacks and having their careers trashed. Now however, as evidence exposes the lies of the global warming lobby, they are starting to come forward.

EU Policy Mash Roils Markets Before Paris Climate Deal.
First of two stories which show that while failing in their stated objectives to save the planet, EU and United Nations policies have been outstanding in their real objectives which were to advance the global government agenda and to tighten the control of the wealthy elite on the lives of the masses

Submerged forests' drowned by ancient climate change revealed by 2014 storms.
Here's yet another smack in the mouth for those smug, condescending scientists who talk down to the rest of us. Far from being a new thing, climsste change was affecting the environment at the beginning of the Bronze age. How many fossil fuel burning power stations did the beaker people have then, and how many Chelsea tractors were tearing up and down the ridgeways?

Global Warming Nutters To Protest In Record Cold Temperatures
You have to smile at the science worshippers and climate change Warmageddonists, they are so detached from reality that if the ice caps were advancing through Europe and North America they's claim it was caused by global warming. They just don't do real world evidence.

Thanks To The Dishonest Climate Scientists, the Public Doesn’t Know Water Vapor Is Most Important Greenhouse Gas.
Yet another exposure of the lies that have propped up the scientific dishonesty and corporate greed behind the global warming scare. Climate change is real, but the climate has changed constantly for millions of years and whatever the final outcome of what is going on now is not likely to be catastrophic. Very minor changes over the last hundred years have been amplified by data manipulation and the likely effects overstated.

Climategate, the sequel: How we are STILL being tricked with flawed data on global warming.
Daily Stirrer occasional contributor Graham Lear returns to one of our favourite themes, the climate change hoax, part of a program of scaremongering being engineered by enemies if freedom and democracy in the higher echelons of scoiety. This about it, who is pushing the myth of catatrophic climate change being caused by Carbon Dioxide from human activity?

Why the war on CO2 has done far more harm than good
Warmageddonists send a lot of time screeching and scaremongering about the potpentially catastrophic outcomes of increased atmospheric CO2 levels, exaggerating their claims wildly in order to frighten people into supporting their war on the oil and coal industries. Policies formulated to tackle the imaginary threat of anthropogenic climate change have ...

Earth’s CO2 Levels Pass Global Warming ‘Milestone', Nothing Happens - Daily Caller.
After two decades of panic stricken scientists and screeching lefties wailing about the catatrophe that would ensue once the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere passed 400 parts per million, that figure was reached in December 2014.

Insane Science Pushing The Earth Towards Ecocide. At the Daily Stirrer we have suspected it for a log time, science is insane, a game for the ethically challenged and sociopathic to compete to be first to develop a new plague, or a death ray, or to trash the enviromnent in pursuit of political power or corporate profits for their paymasters. There's even a name for what they are doing now, Ecocide.

Are Humans Becoming Extinct
some scientists, Guy McPherson included, down at the Climate Change conference who fear that climate disruption is so serious, with so many self-reinforcing feedback loops already in play, that humans are in the process of causing our own extinction.

NASA Data Proves Trump Right to Exit Paris Climate Accord

The science is settled, they kept telling us, and catastropic climate change is coming at us like a runaway train. If the sun don't fry you, droughts and famine don't starve you and rising sea levels don't drown you, then the UV radiation will turn you into a walking, talking melanoma. Of course there was no real -world evidence for this bullshit, only output from mathematical models of the climate, produced after the actual data had been adjusted.

Kit Daniels viaInfowars

NASA’s own data backs President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris climate agreement, despite the agency’s politicized leaders claiming otherwise. Additionally, recent Canadian Ice Service data shows Greenland ice nearing a record high as Arctic sea ice extends over 300,000 square miles past its 2016 levels.

“The useful idiots in the press who report on climate, continue to insist that the Arctic is melting down and nearing catastrophe,” wrote climate analyst Tony Heller. “In the actual Arctic, sea ice extent is normal and Greenland has gained a record amount of ice this winter.”

In 2015, a NASA study showed that Antarctic sheet ice was expanding, refuting claims by global warming advocates that polar ice would soon disappear.

“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers,” the agency admitted. “The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.”

“According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.” Furthermore, there is no such thing as man-made global warming drastically melting ice in the Antarctic, according to analysis of Antarctic expeditions from the early 20th century.

When the current sea ice extent in Antarctica is superimposed over past routes of expedition ships, it reveals that ice on the frigid continent is largely the same now as it was when Sir Ernest Shackleton led his crew through hundreds of miles of ice in 1915. It really shouldn’t be surprising then that it’s mainly politicians – and establishment scientists receiving grants from those politicians – who are furious at President Trump for pulling out of the Paris climate agreement.

“This further demonstrates that the global warming created by man is just a fraud to get more taxes,” reported Zero Hedge. “Scientists have looked over the logbooks of polar explorers Robert Falcon Scott and Ernest Shackleton from their expeditions during 1901-1904 and 1907-1909.”

“The theory that sea ice has declined post-1950 because of man cannot be supported.”

Additionally, the sun is reaching a solar minimum, which indicate the Earth is entering a global cooling phase, and perhaps even a mini ice age.

“The longest minimum on record, the Maunder Minimum of 1645-1715, lasted an incredible 70 years,” reported the Global Warming Policy Forum. “It caused London’s River Thames to freeze over, and ‘frost fairs’ became popular.”

“This period of solar inactivity also corresponds to a climatic period called the ‘Little Ice Age’ when rivers that are normally ice-free froze and snow fields remained year-round at lower altitudes.”

The goal of the Paris climate agreement is entirely political: the globalists are trying to scare the world’s population into believing “global warming” is too big of a threat for their country to handle alone and thus it can only be “defeated” through the expansion of the UN and other unelected, global bureaucracies at the expense of their nation’s sovereignty.

It also allows globalists to control world economies from the top-down by intentionally handicapping productive countries, such as the US, from gaining too much prosperity and thus independence from global bodies.

In particular, the Paris climate agreement would prevent the US from regaining its economic might by burdening companies and average Americans with overzealous “climate change” regulations which aren’t fully enforced on China and numerous third-world nations.

It would put the US at a severe disadvantage it could never recover from.

In short, “man-made climate change” is an manufactured problem exaggerated by the government to instigate a public reaction – fear – the government then exploits to offer a predetermined solution: the expansion of government at the public’s expense.

The global elite are currently meeting at the Bilderberg conference in Chantilly, Virginia, to discuss ways to undermine President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris agreement.

The Bilderberg Group was one of the primary global bodies responsible for orchestrating the “global warming” agenda to marginalize independent nation-states.

Back to menu

Merkel Furious After Trump Refusal To Toe The Party Line Causes G-7 Failure To Agree To Agree On Climate Change

So things dod not go according to the New World Order plan at Donald Trump's first G-7 summit, where the US president refused to be pushed around by leaders of second division powers including German Chancellor Angela Merkel and new French President Emmanuel Macron. The G7 was downgrated from the G8 because of Vladimir Putin's obstinacy in resisting Obama's efforts to depose the Assad regime in Syria, now appearsd to be heading towards further diminuition as the G6. Those loyal to the Obama doctrine of American global hegemony had hoped to persuade the US president to endorse the totally meaningless Paris Agreement climate pledge to fight global warming.

By the end of the summit - held over 24 - 26 May at a luxury hotel in Taormina, Sicily they had to face up to their failure to persuade Trump to adopt the policy of scaremongering about climte disaster in order to advance the gloablisation agenda. Trump reiterated his determination to break the global mold by refusing to follow the Group of Seven line not only on global warming but also by resisting certain measures on trade that will favour global corporations to the detriment of smaller, local, independent businesses.

Furthermore, the final G-7 communique gave the U.S. its own section to say that it is “undergoing a review process” and is unable to join in the discussion, an official cited by Bloomberg said. As a result while the US will remain excluded from the final affirmation that the other six, call it the G-6, will reaffirm that they agree to agree to the Paris Agreement on climate change, which commits signatories to agree that there is a climate, which Trump tweeted Saturday he’d come to a decision on next week.

Needless to say, Merkel who had hoped to leave the Saturday summit with the G-7 agenda endorsed by everyone, including Trump, was furious at the US president.

“The whole discussion about climate has been difficult, or rather very unsatisfactory" German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters Saturday. "Here we have the situation that six members, or even seven if you want to add the EU, stand against one. That means there are no signals until now whether the U.S. will remain in the Paris Agreement or not. We have therefore not talked around it but made clear that we the six member states and the EU remain committed to the goals of the agreement.”

The unhappy German continued: "The fact that we have not been able to make progress here is of course a situation in which you have to say that there is no common support for an important international agreement. This Paris Agreement is not simply any old agreement, but it’s rather a core agreement.”

She concluded by noting the unprecedented breach of agreement within the ranks, perhaps a first in G-7 history “There is right now no agreement. But we have made very clear that we are not moving away from our positions.”

Moments later, the final declaration released a just as stunning statement, which said that the U.S. was "not in a position to join consensus" on climate change. Trump’s lack of rapport with European leaders on this issue raises serious questions about his ability to work with critical U.S. allies. This accords with his 'America first' campaign rhetoric, so why is anyone surprised?

There was at least some concensus on trade among the leaders, after haggling over wording on protectionism and reciprocal benefits, the WSJ reported. Technical negotiations went on into the early hours of morning in Taormina to try to reconcile Trump’s ‘America First’ approach with the other leaders’ commitment to open markets. The result is a reference to combating protectionism to be included in the final text, according to two of the officials. Still, said the third, the document in its current draft clearly falls back by comparison to earlier G-7 communiques which go close to committing leaders to a borderless world (with free movement of goods and labour which are very bad for working and middle class people, and free movement of money (to wealth - freiendly tax jurisdictions) which is very good for the super rich.

Back to menu

Afghan troops defect to Taliban in Helmand
According to news sources in Pakistan, up to sixty five Afghan soldiers, trained and armed by US and European military advisers, have defected to the resurgent Taliban, taking their weapons and equipment with them. Another 88 are reported to have been killed in heavy fighting between Taliban irregulars and government forces in the southern province of Helmand.

The Revolution Is Spreading: Now Austria Turns Against The Anti - White Leftist Elite
With Sweden's coalition of opponents, formed to deny a place in government to the anti - immigration, pro - Swedish culture party The Sweden Democrats a place in government that was their democratic right, falling apart; with France's Front National, led by Marine Le Pen topping polls and other parties opposed to mass immigration and the destruction of European culture riding high elsewhere, Austria has become the latest nation where voters have turned their backs on the consensus politics of Cultural Marxism.

The International Elite's Contempt For National Sovereignty
Ersatz Culture Created By World View Theorists To Undermine Western Values
A global corporateocracy
The Government-Corporate Complex Takes Complete Control Of The USA.
If Free Market Capitalism Is The Global Economic System, WTF Is This All About?
Corporatism: Government of The People By The Technocrats For The Monopoly Men Of The Global Elite
Centralized power - the worst of all possible worlds
How Globalism and Big Agriculture Corporations Are Destroying Independent Farmers.
Scientific Dictatorship: Totalitarian World Government Is Not A New Idea
The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech and Information
Here's How Working Class Organisations Out Of Which the Labour Movement Grew Were Hijacked By Elitist Control Freaks.
European Commission puts business profits before the needs of the world’s poorest.
Is Europe Waking Up To The Threat Of Globalism Posed by Secret Trade Treaties
Privatization of Water as an Owned Commodity Rather Than a Universal Human Right
US-EU Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) Will Have Devastating Social and Environmental Consequences
Foreign Exchange Market Rigging: Another Conspiracy Theory Exposed As Truth
Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership Attacks Democracy
A Song Of Servitude (poem)
Holy City (poem)
Our New Unhappy Lords Is a Global Wide Cash Ban Coming
Post Trump And Brexit Globalists Next Move
The Real Rate Of Inflation, USA, UK (Europe’s is off the scale). The Global Economy Is Bankrupt
Globalists Like Soros Are Now Blatantly Moving Forward Their Totalitarian World Government Agenda
Oh What A Tragedy For Globalists: Here’s what we will miss by being outside the EU
Former Morgan Stanley Chief Asia Economist: “Don’t Listen To The Ruling Elite, The World Economy Is In Real Trouble”
U2 Celeb Bono partners with Monsanto, G8, to biowreck African farms with GMOs

Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Writerbeat ] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]

Germany Facing Mass Blackouts Because The Wind And Sun Won’t Cooperate

Germany’s power grid came close tp collapse in January because the poor performance from sustainables, wind turbines and solar panels which the Germany government encouraged heavy investment in, data from a major trade union leaked to German business newspaper Deutsche Wirtschasfts Nachrichten.

Wind and solar power plants under-performed in January, 2017, because of cloudy weather with little or no wind, setting the stage for massive blackouts. It is worth remining ourselves that the largest wind turbines, around 100 meters high, the only onces capable of generating power profitably on a commercial scale, require winds of around 25Kph (20 mph) to run efficiently and they have to be locked down in winds gusting over 50 Kph (40 mph).

A major blackout almost occurred Jan. 24 and was only prevented when German energy suppliers “also took the last reserve power plant,” Michael Vassiliadis, head of the union which represents power plants of IG Bergbauchemie Energie, told reporters. The country’s power grid was strained to the absolute limit and could have gone offline entirely, triggering a national blackout, if just one power plant had gone offline, according to Vassiliadis.

“The renewables could not even offer five percent [of total power demand.] Coal, gas and nuclear power kept the country almost in the first place under the electric current,” Vassiliadis said.

Germany was forced to recommission coal power plants mothballed due to compliance with EU targets for CO2 reduction to simply keep the lights on. The country’s green energy plans calls for the shut down of 30 such power plants by 2019. Britain's energy security is in a similarly precarious state thanks to sustainable or'green' energy policies that have fallen far short of expected output levels, cost a phenomenal amount of money in subsidies to operators and led to a failure of forward planning to meet future demand.

RELATED POSTS: Back to Contents table
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [ It's Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [Latest Posts] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]

The Global Warming Scam Is A Weapon In The War On Free Speech

An article in The Washington Times looks at the latest move to silence those who question the motives of the climate change lobby and the pseudo science behind the scam. I, and many of my friends, all believers in freedom of speech and expression, have frequently been callede 'climate deniers' and worse for exposing the statistical frauds behind climate change scaremongering.

Nobody denies there is a climate of course, and nobody denies that it changes. Sometimes a sunny day changes to cold and cloudy, sometimes the sun hardly warms our lands for wekas as rain, snow and hail pummel us. The wind blows strongly on Tuesday, uprooting treees and overturning high sided goods vehicles but on Wednesday, hardly a cats paw ripples the surface of the lake. Mark Twain, who was very wise and did not need mathematical models to help him understand that some things lie beyond the meddling of man, observed that "everybody talks about the weather but nobody does anything about it."

The attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands thinks he has found the way to silence, once and for all, the debate over global warming, or climate change, or whatever the 'progressive liberals' and other authoritarian neo fascists are calling the scam this week. Claude Walker, the Obama of the Caribbean who leads the assault on not just free speech but freedom of thought in the idyllic Caribbean microstate presented a subpoena this week to compel the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a public policy think tank skeptical of the climate scam, to turn over all its documents relating to the Institute’s research.

His 14-page subpoena demands the Institute’s documents, communications, emails, op-eds, speeches, advertisements, letters to the editor, research, reports, studies and memoranda of any kind — including drafts — that refer to climate change, greenhouse gases, carbon tax, climate science and the like that in any way are related to Exxon Mobil or the "products sold by, activities carried out by ExxonMobil that directly or indirectly impact climate change."

Mr. Walker reveals the real intent of his lawsuit with a demand for a list of donors to the Institute, the better to pressure them with threats of legal harassment. "We’ve been targeted for our opinions," says Kent Lassman, the new president and CEO of the Institute. Mr. Walker, in fact, is merely acting as the front man for 20 states who have joined forces to prosecute organizations that have exposed the doomsday wailing and gnashing of teeth that is the stock in trade of the global-warming industry.

"Not everyone believes that the planet is warming," Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee, wrote recently in USA Today, "and not everyone who thinks [the planet] is warming agrees on how much; not everyone who thinks that it is warming even believes that laws or regulation can make a difference. Yet the goal of these state attorneys general seems to be to treat disagreement as something more or less criminal."

In fact the ultimate goal of the ruling elites has little to do with global warming or climate change. The goal is clearly to demonstrate that the government has the power to punish dissent, silence criticism, shut down objections and disagreement, and even prosecute those who have politically incorrect thoughts. You must let government make all your decisions for you, because we have PhD qualifications in Philosophy, Politics and Economics while you the masses are stupid and cannot understand complex issues. Government must be unimpeded in doing whatever it wants to do to youir life.

"[This subpoena] is designed not only to silence us," says Myron Ebell, an official of the Institute, "but it is also designed to defund us. These [are] efforts to defund us and other free-market groups that have politically incorrect views on climate and some other major issues. We’ve been dealing with this for a long time, but I think we have now reached another level. When you get an attorney general involved, it’s no longer just a debate in the public base that tries to shut us up, but it’s using the full force of the state to do so."

So there you have it, the climate change scare is really, as my friends and I have always said, about power and control and little to do with saving the planet. This last bit is probably fortunate as not of the predictions of catastrophe in recent years (ice cap melt, rishing sea levels, 50 million refugees, no more snow, mass extinction, the destruction of coral reefs and widespread famile because of crop failure have actually happened so it's a good thing world leaders only managed to agree that 'something must be done' without actually having a clue what. Because any money spent would have been wasted and any actions such as the proposed but in practical terms impossible geoengineering projects might well have resulted in far worse humancatatstrophes than the very worst predicitions of the climate scientists mathematical models of the climate could produce.

RELATED POSTS: Back to Contents table

Global Temperature Record Is A Smoking Gun Of Collusion And Fraud In Climate Science
Are the latest leaked documents from the Global Warming conspiracy published by Wikileaks the smoking gun the carbon dioxide driven climate change sceptics have been waiting for? The ceretainly demonstrate beyond not just reasonable doubt but any doubt at all that the research grant phising climate scientists deliberately changed data so the algorithms would give the answer they wanted.

If global warming is real, then why does the NOAA's own data show no warming for 58 years?
Suddenly ‘Global warming' is a seriously hot topic again; after a period in which many prominent scientists who not long ago would have been reluctant to point of the flawed science and fraudulent statistics behind the scam, for fear of having their careers and reputations trashed by 'The Science Inquisition', now almost every day there’s a new report claiming that humans are to blame for climate change

Paris Climate conference: Scientists Debunk Global Warming Scaremongering
As national leaders and self interested science whore collaborated to impose of the world a United Nations “climate regime” based on the vile and authoritarian Agenda 21 agreement, at the COP21 global-warming summit, a group of internationally respected scientists and environmentalists from various fields presented research at a separate conference in Paris that ridiculed the climate change hysteria.

Volkswagen Emissions Scandal - Is It The Tip Of The Iceberg?
The real problem here is that, driven by the hysterical warnings of self interested pseudo-scientists, politicians have set unachievable targets for reducing emissions while demanding that national economies keep growing.

Climate Change: Physicist Asks Is a Deadly Ice Age on the Horizon?
The last ice age ended approximately 12,000 years ago, and since then we’ve been enjoying a pleasantly warm “interglacial period.” But given that an interglacial may last only 12,000 years, we’re confronted with a scary prospect: Another ice age may be nigh.

America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism Several times now it has looked as if the climate chance scare was over as the enthusiasm of climate scitentists for changing real world data to fit in with the predictions of their mathematical models has been exposed. But as the scare was never about the environment, but was a scam to redistribute wealth from rich to poor countries, the politicians are throwing their propaganda budgets behind it again.

Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA
Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.

Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess
Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), has said temperature readings from the Arctic and Antarctic used to estimate the effects of global warming are nothing more than guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to carry out a wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on global warming.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... Daily Stirrer ...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ Authorsden blog ] ... [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax

See Nobel physics laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015. Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate.

What he shows here is horrifying as it exposes the complete dishonesty of those who advise governments on matters of science.

Less than 1º increase in almost 200 years, which could even be attributed to measuring errors. Only 8 thermometers accross the globe, the possible errors of measurement, the fact that they deliberately added the ocean and ommited the antartic cooling before the Paris conference. The cost for human societies of reducing CO2 is in general insanely high. I would expect that some super strong science would be behind those decisions, but apparently it is precisely the opposite

RELATED POSTS:

Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Another respected scientist comes out and denounces the science behind the climate change scare as a fraud. The whole thing has been a scam to justify punitive taxes on fuel and enable the rich to make fortunes trading carbon credits. Again it shows what a sack of rogues the climate science community really are.

What if man-made climate change is all in the mind?
If our view of reality is shaped by the mind and our perceptions of information, how successful are attempts to manipulate the perceptions of the whole populations through manipulated data, spin and assertions of authority likely to be. As scientists and politicians moan that the public no longer take sertiously climate change scare stories, we have to conclude, not very.

Meteorologists Begin To Admit To Climate Engineering
The freethinkers and Libertarians of New Media have been questioning the pseudoscientific certainties of the global warming lobby for a long time. During that often acrimonious process (because the Global Warming lobby are ever bit as organised and as driven by blind hatred of those who question them as the Bearded Queens In Bridal Gowns lobby) and most of us have been accused of infanticide, genocide and worse. At last the respectable climate scientists (the ones who didn't sell their arse for the corporate dollar) are speaking, and the media are listening.

Mad Scientists Now In A Race To Create Human - Animal Hybrids
Scientists all over the world are busy creating extremely bizarre human-animal chimeras. Once again The Daily Stirrer has to say "We told you so". There is something very creepy and sinister embedded in the typical scientists desire to play God. It is a complete, psychopathic disregard for moral boundaries. If we can do it that ...

UK Offshore Windfarms Produce More Rust and CO2 Than Electricity
A private case going through a British court of arbitration at the moment involves two very large supply organisations. Unfortunately the case is being heard away from the prying eyes and radar like ears of the media. A 1996 Act Of Parliament enabled such things as a way to free up Court time taken up by complex technical disputes…. And, perhaps, to keep embarrassing truths away from ...

Doctors may withhold treatment from patients with "green lifestyle issues."
A few weeks ago an item on the BMA's website linked to the "Doctors against climate change" group of the doctors' trade union. This body of medico-environmental socialist - utopians stated ...
The Two Faces Of The Politics Of Failure
What a mess the modern way of doing politics based on a politically correct consensus and social engineering has produced. The daily stirrer looks at how the bipolar left - right divide stops things getting better rather than helping get the developed world back on track.

Green Policies Will Not Save The Planet But Are Costing Poor Families The Earth>
Politicians bleat sabout the plight of the poor then press on with their clean, green, sustainable energy policies which include stealth taxes to subsidise expensive and inefficient wind turbine and solar panel power generators. Can they not see it is the green agenda that is driving up inflation ...[Environment]

Solar Storm Armageddon: Will This Be What Makes Warmageddonists Shut T F UP
An eruption on the surface of the sun, aka solar storn will send a flood of highly charged particles towards earth. Satellite communications and other technology might suffer sone disruption but the best thing about it is from here in the north of England we will be able to see the Aurora.

The Danish Experience - Problems With Wind Power And The Truth About Turbines
The truth about wind turbines, their real efficiency as opposed to the hyperbolic claims of clean sustainable energy firms and their lobbyists, politically correct politicians and green activists and how wind farm operators have been given a licence to pick the pockets of taxpayers

Statistics, Graphs and Hockey Sticks
A poem about the famous hocvkey stick graph and the science scam it was a frony for. Posted now as a valedictory celebration because US climate monitoring agncies NASA and NOAA have at last admitted the global average temperature has risen only marginally over the past few decades.

Climate Change - The Edge Of The Abyss
Media and government reports still say we are staring into the abyss because carbon emissions are too high. But have they ever though we would have to shut down all economic activity in the developed world to change things.

We Might As Well Ask The CRU climate scientists to forcast the economic trends
As our finance expert John de Roe digests today's economic statement by Chancellor George Osborne we advise readers to ignore gloomy economic forecasts from supra national bodies with close political ties to the "New World Order". Both the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) and the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) along with numerous other thinky tanky type thingies published their latest economic forecasts ahead of the Chancellors statement. These forecasts which are invariably gloomy and predict ...

Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA

by James Taylor in Forbes.com

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.

The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent.

Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as “proof” of a global warming crisis.)

Read full article ...

In our efforts to expose the global warming sacre as a scientific scam aimed at justifying masive taxes on energy, we have returned again and to the theme of how all data supplied as evidence of catatsrophic global warming was in fact the output form mathematical models running on computers and fed 'adjusted' (i.e. fraudulent) data. Again and again we and many other alternative news sites have produced evidence to back our arguments, only to be met with a hysterical backlash from science zealots accusing us of heresy. Well sorry guys, science is not a religion and if you keep lying to try to prove your God infallible, those inconvenient real world facts are going to trip you up again and again.

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

Weather Channel Founder Slams Global Warming Fraud
The climate change lobby have been on the back foot for a long time as eminent scientists queued to be next to point out that when real world observations repeatedly contradict data produced by mathematical models run on university computer systems, any credible research team would take a long critical look at their models rather than adjusting the empirical data so it gives the required answer.

Climate fraud exposed
EU climate policy is a scam
The economic realities that expose the climate change fraud Media lies that propped up climate change scare Challenge climate scare and you'll be subjected to a witch hunt The real agenda behind the climate scam
Climate change index
Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]

We have always taken the line that the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare, which posits that instability in the global climate is due solely to carbon dioxide gas emitted because of human activity is a scam to justify massive taxes on citizens in the developed world. With an economist, a management consultant and an engineer on the team we think we are qualified to comment although some argue we are not 'trained scientists' and therfore 'cannot understand the science'. That is bollocks of course, 'the science' in question is basic arithmetic. But to silence those critics who say we are not entitled to an opinion, here's a physicist saying more of less what we have said on the 'science'.

Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015. Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate. The only cure for government led "Warmageddonism", is honest, unbiased, objective science like the video above presents. Governments and Banksters are using fear of natural occurrences, to extort trillions of dollars worldwide, and giving taxpayers nothing in return. Merely a transference of wealth, not from rich nations to poor nations as they would have you believe but from taxpayers to oligarchs. And it is the poor who will be hit hardest. It's the greatest scam of all time (bigger even than religion). Fair Use: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog]

As Global Government Geeks Push For Paris Climate Deal, New Report throws More Doubt On Climate Science

As a hoard of political leaders, assorted 'experts' and 'scientists', research asistants, SPADs, secretaries, lobbyists, prostitutes and hundreds of other hangers on pack their bags ready to head for Paris by private jet, in order to attend the lastest ~~jolly~~ climate change summit on cutting CO2 emissions, yet another piece of evidence has emerged that 'the science' propping up claims that Carbon Dioxide will kill us all by ~~next Tuesday~~, ~~next year~~, the middle of the next century or somtime after that, is not quite as settled as we have been told.

While the 'climate scientists' who have been promoting the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare are all computer geeks whose 'evidence'in support of their theopries is generated entirely by mathematical models contructed from 'adjusted data', a team of atmospheric chemistry boffins from France and Germany say they have identified a new process by which vast amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere from the sea - a process which was unknown until recently, meaning that existing climate models do not take account of it.

The effect of VOCs released into the atmosphere is to cool the climate down, thus the computer generated climate models used to predict catastrophic warming are failing to factor in at least one important element in the equation. While Warmageddonosts still run around yelling WE'RE ALL DOOMED, this is just one of many pieces of research that while totally unreported by mainstream media, goes a long way to explaining why, even though the temperature of the political climate has been rising, global mean temperatures have actually been stable for more almost twenty years, a circumstance which was not predicted by climate models and which climate science is still struggling to accept as they try to claim that if the emprical data does not agree with the synthesized predictions, then the real world must be wrong.

In simple terms, this research reveals that a key VOC, isoprene, produced by living organisms (for example plants and trees on land and plankton in the sea) is also produced in the "microlayer" at the top of the ocean by the action of sunlight on floating chemicals - no life being necessary. And according to the German / French team it is produced very large amounts.

According to an announcement just issued by the German government's Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research:

Atmospheric chemists can now demonstrate that isoprene may be formed, without the presence of biological sources, in the surface film of seawater, by sunlight. This explains the large discrepancy between field measurements and models. The new identified photochemical reaction is therefore important to improve the accuracy of existing climate models which, although they are portrayed as infallible (cuz it's science, yeah!) have so far proved wildly inaccurate in all their predictions.

Current global climate models assume emissions of isoprene from all sources including trees, plants, plankton and micro - organisms of around one point nine megatons per year. According to the new research however, newly discovered "abiotic" processes release as much as 3.5 megatons, previously not included in algorithms. This "could explain the recent disagreements between models and reality," the researchers claim.

"We were able for the first time to trace back the production of this important aerosol precursor to abiotic sources. So far global calculations consider only biological sources," explains Dr Christian George from French lab the Institute of Catalysis and Environment, in Lyon.

VOCs such as isoprene have been identified as a powerful factor in the natural processes regulationg the climate, because they enable the formation of aerosol particles. Some aerosols, for instance black soot, have a warming effect, but the ones resulting from VOCs have a substantial cooling effect because they act as nuclei for the formation of clouds. It has previously been believed that VOC production from pine forests could act as a negative feedback of such significance that it "limits climate change from reaching such levels that it could become really a problem in the world."

The discovery of the new abiotic process, the theory that unless carbon emissions from human activity are cut drastically, catastrophic clobal warming is inevitable loses much of its credibility. That's probably good news, as it has emerged lately that recent efforts to cut carbon emissions are having the unfortunate effect of poisoning the planet.

The full report of this research on VOCs is available as a .pdf file the learned journal Environmental Science and Technology. The Leibniz Institute notes: "Because of the great importance this paper will be open access".

Return to contents table

IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables

Environmental Economists Claim Fossil Fuels Receive Large Subsidies

Image Source: medialib.glogster.com

A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are stated to amount to £77 billion a year.

On closer analysis however the alleged fossil fuel subsidy turns out not to be a subsidy at all, but an estimate (guess, wish,) of the costs to governments of dealing with fossil fuel pollution. The IMF have insisted however that their figure is “shocking,” but “extremely robust”, and are using it to lobby for an end to “subsidies” for fossil fuel companies on both health and economic grounds, the Guardian has reported.

“When the number came out at first, we thought we had better double check this!” said David Coady, head of the IMF’s fiscal affairs department. But he said the broad picture was “extremely robust”, adding: “It is the true cost associated with fossil fuel subsidies.”

Vitor Gaspar, the IMF’s head of fiscal affairs and former finance minister of Portugal agreed, saying “These estimates are shocking. Energy prices remain woefully below levels that reflect their true costs.”

According to the IMF’s report, cutting the ‘subsidies’ would reduce global emissions by 20 percent, and halve the number of deaths from outdoor pollution, saving around 1.6 million lives a year although no information as to how this migh happen is offered, a 20% contraction in the global economy perhaps?. They also envisage that making fossil fuel companies pay for pollution would be a “game changer” for governments, who could use the newly released economic resources to pay for education, health and infrastructure.

We have to be gobsmacked by the ignorance and naivete of these people; all that would happen is fuel prices would rocket forcing food and consumer goods prices up, millions of people in the developed world would be pushed into poverty, wages and welfare bils would rise and the global economy would go into a deflationary spiral.

Lord Nicholas Stern, a climate economist at the London School of Economics, said, somewhat nonsensically: “This very important analysis shatters the myth that fossil fuels are cheap by showing just how huge their real costs are. There is no justification for these enormous subsidies for fossil fuels, which distort markets and damages economies, particularly in poorer countries.

As if seeking to demonstrate this is just another exercise in sacremongering, Stern added that the IMF’s figure should be considered an underestimate (again absolutely no evidence is offered): “A more complete estimate of the costs due to climate change would show the implicit subsidies for fossil fuels are much bigger even than this report suggests,” he said.

The IMF accepts that ending the (imaginary) subsidy on fossil fuels would increase energy prices, but argues that it would be acceptable to do so as wealthy people benefit most from the supposed subsidy. According to the IMF, the wealthiest 20 percent receive six times the amount of subsidy as the poorest 20 percent in low and middle income countries, presumably simply because they use more energy than poor people.

Again this is the kind of bollocks only privileged, university dumbed down elitist idiots could try to sell. Whereas the moderately affluent (such as myself) would not even blink if our energy bills increased by twenty per cent, to people living on the edge of poverty it would mean having to choose between heating their homes and putting food on the table. The IMF know this, which exposes their dishonesty as well as their stupidity.

The cabal of idiots working for the renewables / carbon trading lobby has also inadvertently revealed the true motive for releasing these fairy tale figures: they need to whitewash the amount governments spend on actual subsidies (not guesstimates or wishful thinking) for renewable energies each year by piling costs onto fossil fuels until they become unsustainable. “If we get the pricing of fossil fuels right, the argument for subsidies for renewable energy will disappear. Renewable energy would all of a sudden become a much more attractive option,” said Coady.

Unfortunately no matter how competitive in price renewable energy becomes, wind turbines will still not generate when the wind does not blow and more that solar panels will produce electricity when the sun does not shine.

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

Big Business Joins Climate Change Scaremongers
The Paris summit on climate change approasches, which means the tree hugging fascist tendency are turning up the volume to eleven again. Trouble is they cannot produce a shed of evidence to back up their wild claims of imminent catastrophe because global warming only exists in their mathematical models, in the real world it is not happening/

"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
Kill All Intelligent People
Will New German Study End Global Warming Hysteria?

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]

Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess

by Hurricane Hughes - climate correspondent, 15 May, 2015

Image source: Wikimedia commons

Many alternative media sites sceptical of the dodgy science behind the global warming scare, The Haily Stirrer among them, regularlyu question the climate scientists practice of 'adjusting' temperature data fed into the computer models on which predictions of climate catastrophe are based.

Now a climate scientist, Dr Benny Peiser who heads up the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), has said temperature readings from the Arctic and Antarctic used to estimate the effects of global warming are nothing more than guesswork. GWPF last month announced its intention to carry out a wide-ranging review of the data underpinning claims on global warming.

Launched primarily in response to interested parties flagging up major discrepancies between what climate scientists' models say is happening and what observable changes are taking place in the real world. Prompted by observations that while data from weather stations, marked 2014 out as the hottest year on record, data gathered from satellites, which showed no measurable warming has taken place for over 18 years, the review aims to explain such mismatches. The scale of the discrepancy has led to accusations that weather station data had been “adjusted”, thereby exaggerating the effects of global warming, something which the Foundation is keen to investigate.

The review panel, headed by Professor Terence Kealey, the former vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, will be taking submissions for evidence until the 30th June, but Dr Peiser has said that questions and concerns have already been raised about how the discrepancy could have come about.

“There’s a lack of clarity, a lack of transparency and a growing concern about what is going on,” he told the Express. “Given these concerns, we thought there must be a better way of answering these questions.

“This is not about anthropogenic or man-made climate change, this is about whether the gatekeepers of the data, the meteorological agencies, are providing reliable information.”

Dr Peiser raised concerns that some researchers who contribute to the temperature records have been outspoken in their views on climate change, saying: “People ask why they are the gatekeepers of the data if they have such strong opinions. Should they really be the guardians of data quality and high standards?

Data adjustments are not the only issue raised so far by the review. Dr Peiser also highlighted the practice of “infilling” data where a lack of weather stations means no real world readings are being taken. Without gathering real world data, these data points are nothing more than guesswork.

And he said there were problems both with the siting of weather stations, and with differences arising between technologies.

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Latest Posts

Climate - the CO2 effect overstated
Some clear thinking on climate change
The cost to civilisation of Green scaremongering
The political agenda behind climate scares
Climate Change index

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]

UN IPCC Climate Change Report Will Warn Of 'Severe, Pervasive' Effects Of Global Warming

That is, the refusal of the climate to deliver scaremongering predictions will have the severe and pervasive effect of exposing climate science as a sham

Warmageddonists are pestering that poor bloody polar bear again.

Flooding, dangerous heatwaves, ill health and violent conflicts among likely risks if the world keeps burning fossil fuels at current rates, IPCC expected to say, according to mainsteam media reports that cherry pick the most alarming predictions and fail to highlight the vagueness introduced by words and phrases like 'might', 'could', possibly', and 'in the worst case'.

Flooding, dangerous heatwaves, ill health and violent conflicts are among the likely risks if temperatures exceed 2C above pre-industrial levels, the report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will say. In other words prety normal bad weather events of they kind recordeed by diarists, commentators and chroniclers since writing was invented sometime between 5 and 10 thousand years ago, and by students of weather and climate for the past 200 years.

Warming beyond 4C would likely result in “substantial species extinction, large risks to global and regional food security, impacts on normal human activities” the report screams in alarm without mentioning that in the last hundred and fifty years mean temperatures have risen less than one degree centigrade.

The final document, which appears to have been rewritten line-by-line by international government (? When did we get a world Government>) officials at a summit in Copenhagen, is intended to provide ~~an excuse to impose punitive taxes on the most essential items of expenditure~~ the clearest and most concise summary yet of the widely debunked 'scientific consensus' on climate change.

How stupid is it to insist that global is all to do with CO 2 gas. No one person seems to know where the big problem is. No amount of decreasing CO 2 gas is going to make things better unless we all, in North, South, East & West simply stop consuming (and the governments and bankers fundung the Warmageddon scare don't want that as it would trash the global economy which must achiever perpetual growth.

RELATED POSTS:

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]

Renewable Energy: So Useless That Even Green Loons At Google Have Given up on it

Apart from the science related problems, this happens more often that greenies care to admit.

The sandal wearing, tree hugging, bearded puritans of the Watermelon tendency (green on the outside, red on the inside) call it "renewable energy", the zealots of the Church Of Scienceology cal it sustainable energy, those with smarter heads on their shoulder call it "alternative energy" because that's what it really is: an alternative to energy that actually works (eg nuclear and anything made from cabon-rich fuel from organic matter laid down in pre-history and left to brew for a few hundred million years.)

I'm sure the Warmageddonists will set up a right scream after reading that paragraph, but a pair of top boffins hired at enormous expense by infra-green Google's research department have reached the same conclusion.

In The Register, Lewis Page reports Ross Konigstein and David Fork, both Stanford PhDs (aerospace engineering; applied physics) were employed on a Google research project which sought to enhance renewable technology to the point where it could produce energy more cheaply than coal. But after four years, the project was closed down. In this post at IEEE Spectrum they tell us why.

We came to the conclusion that even if Google and others had led the way toward a wholesale adoption of renewable energy, that switch would not have resulted in significant reductions of carbon dioxide emissions. Trying to combat climate change exclusively with today’s renewable energy technologies simply won’t work; we need a fundamentally different approach.

Why is renewable energy such a total fail? Because, as the Google team explain to The RegisterThe Register explains in this report on the same project, it is ludicrously inefficient, obscenely expensive that if ever we were so foolish as to try rolling it out on a scale beyond its current boutique levels, it would necessitate bankrupting the global economy. Where Lewis does no go in that report from The Register, is the enormous environmental damage done by 'cleaan, green energy'. The huge rafts of concrete required as foundations for 2MW wind turbines disrupt natural drainage patterns and make areas susceptible to flash floods, while covering vast acreages in mirrors for solar power while scientists are screaming (falsely) about the need to switch to Genetically Modified crops to feed the world's hungry.

Let's deal with the fallacies in left wing propaganda there. In fact we do not need GM crops because a) they don't produce significantly greater yields without massive irrigation (in a world where water shortage is increasingly a problem) and expensive special fetilizers (which third world farmers can't affort) and b) North American and European governments have for decades been paying farmers not to grow food; anyone remember the European Union butter and grain mountains or the milk lake and olive oil lake? Or the character in Joseph Heller's Catch 22 whose father had grown rich from what the government paid him to not grow certain crops?

But one insanity at a time, back to renewable energy which in a nutshell, is uneconomical because so much equipment is needed to make it work - steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage - that it very likely uses up more energy than it actually produces. It is also unreliable because as I keep explaining to the Warmageddonists, Wind Turbines cannot generate power when the wind does not blow and solar panels cannot generate power when the sun is down (on average, over the course of a year, 12 hours a day, anywhere on the globe.

Yet still our political class and the scientific whores who serve them (science was ever fascism's whore) remains committed to the fantasy that the emperor's new green clothes are absolutely wonderful. Earlier this week, for example, the British government chucked £720 million of taxpayers' money into an EU / United Nations fronted cesspit labelled the Green Climate Fund.

In theory this initiative is supposed to help Third World countries cope with the effects of climate change. In reality, all it will do is force on their struggling economies more of the costly, intermittent renewable technologies (wind turbines; solar; etc) which have proved such a disaster for the advanced Western economies (Germany, Netherlands, Spain and Denmark have now abandoned their plans to switch totally to green energy. Spain is reliant on France's nulclear power stations, Denmark relies on Germany's coal generating plants while Germany is dangerously dependent on Russian gas for a nation involved in Obama's economic war on Russia.

RELATED POSTS:

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*
I've had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying was "after dinner". Then it goT to "Tomorrow ...... or the day after tomorrow perhaps," then "next year", "before 2050," and eventually "soon." Climate Change: reality versus IPCC scaremongering
Climate change and the trillion dollar geoengineering scam
Mainsteam media lies misrepresenting climate change
What happened to the missing fifty million climate refugees
Is climate change part of an American world domination agenda

Climate Change: CO2 Is Less Significant Than An Ant's Fart

by Arthur Foxake - 9 November, 2014

I believe it was in the BBC TV wildlife programme Life in the Undergrowth (2005 - still available on DVD) in which the saintly David Attenborough reveals that the world's termites emit 1500 times as much CO2 as the entire human race including all industry. Surely it would be easier to wipe out 0.06% of the termites to balance things up and finally prove the Warmageddonists wrong.

Sorry folks, global warming like everything today, is a political played simultaneously at national, international, inter-religion, intra-religion, inter-bloc, inter-racial and more. The prize is control. When Mr ban Ki Moon, loking bewildered as usual, reads words written for him by globalist bureaucrats, he is just acting as a front man for the game's sponsors. Let's stop all these useless conferences and simply agree to respect this planet that gives us food, water, and all we need and supplies a few fun items too.

The goal of We The People should be to live good lives and leave behind us a place that, if not better, is at least as good as the one we inherited from our ancestors. Life is not about being profit centres for commerical organisations. If we ignore all the rhetoric, propaganda and advertising puff, we will discover that eralier generations managed quite well without the internet, iPads, Smartphones, Plasma TVs and all the rest of the bollocks that is supposed to have improved our lives. In fact such evidence as is available from the era before public opinion polling was around to tell people what their opinions were, people were actually happier and more fulfilled.

It is time to tell the bankers and businessment, the political leaders and the armies of academics, public relatioins consultants and assorted 'experts' who advise them, including religious heads, bewildered international bureaucrats and other elitists that time is running out for them.

Still, fair play to the Warmagedonists and their junk science. They do not give up and never let little things like empirical evidence or reality get in the way of their evangelical desire to plunge us all back into a world of medieval technology. And now the ignorant arrogant idiots think they can challenge nature, they are our modern day King Canutes, fraudsters and charlatans the lot of them, I'll give them a simple challenge to show if they are right or wrong, exactly how much snow will the UK get over the next 6 months, if their models are correct they should be able to give us an answer within several cm's and gain our confidence.

Even if it were all true, Britain only contributes 1% of the world's carbon emissions, but it is the ordinary British public who are suffering the most as green levies on energy bills force poor households to choose between eating and heating ( while China build 10 new coal burning power stations a year). Like that ebola crises in Africa, it is manufactured scaremongring designed to frighten us all into tolerating further attacks on our individual freedoms but in reality it has little to do with us. Our control freak government cannot bear to be left out of any globalist move to curtail the rights of the individual.

The Wonderful, Climate Science Defying Vikings

One of the most repeated lies of the whole Warmageddonist scare is that never in human history has the atmosphere been this warm before (forget the Medieval Warm Period, it was all due to peasants burning hockey sticks ... or something. And yet the 'Vikings', so often dismissed by history as ignorant, hairy, horny drunks who terrorised civilisation in Western Europe as they raided in their Longboats (A beautifully designed vessel), raping, pillaging and plundering.

The academic community stick together of course, so today's children do not hear about Vikings Eric Dorvaldsson (Eric the Red 950 to 1003AD) who set out for fabled lands to the North West of Scotland and came upon Iceland. The climate there was more benign than it is today and he established communities. He then duly set out west again, following the advice of The Pet Shop Boys song and came upon Greenland (which he dubbed Vinland). It had a lot less ice than nowadays and Erik established farming communities, remains of which have been found under the recently melted ice.

Eric used to be considered by historians as the first 'Real Estate Con Artist'. Calling his newly discovered landmass 'Greenland' to encourage settlers. The remains of the farming communities give credence to his sales glossies however. His son Leif (Eriksson), in about 1000AD, headed west again, landed in Canada and settled a colony there (Norse settlement at L’Anse aux Meadows, at the northernmost tip of Newfoundland) where they grew oats and barley and turnips. The colony did not last, leaving after about 3 years, having had a falling out (over longship parking spaces?) with the locals.

The evidence, the real evidence, not the mathematical modelling, suggests it was warmer then than now, which ties in with the conclusion I reached a few years ago while looking at the neolithic village of Scara Brae, the ancient (3000BC) Stone Age Settlement in Orkney. Rain lashed across the site and an icy wind blew in from The Atlantic, having not encountered so much as a small hill or even a clump of trees on its way from The North Pole.

Anyone who lived there for any length of time would need more fortitude than I and probably you possess. A similar conclusion reached by Simon Schama in his 'History or Britain' DVD Series which toured the site. It may be accepted that our ancestors were considerably more durable that modern generations but even so, to not only survive but manage to successfully begin cultivating crops in these hostile environments without the aid of modern energy generation, technology and clothing would have been almost impossible unless the climate was considerably warmer at the time.

Global Warming therefore does not appear directly related to the current pronouncement of the UN, Greenhouse Gas Content being the highest in the last 800,000 years.

Science Fraud And The Climate Perpetual Motion Engine

Xavier Connolly

The IPCC claims are baseless. The clue is Figure 2.5 of Houghton's 'Physics of Atmospheres'. For the surface to be part of the radiation transfer chain in the atmosphere, it would have to be significantly warmer than the local atmosphere.Using 0.75 atmospheric absorptivity, 16 deg C surface, to transfer 160 W/m^2 by IR to the local atmosphere, it must be just below 0 deg C. In reality, it is kept very near surface temperature by convection maintaining lapse rate.

Bottom line: according Houghton's grey body atmosphere assumption, there is near zero, nada, zilch IR energy transfer from the surface to the atmosphere. This disproves the most basic claim of the IPCC's pseudoscience! The IPCC co-founder supports its fake science when he published the real science in 1977.

This stinks: pass it on so we can get an official investigation.

The real atmosphere is semi-transparent; hence 63 W/m^2 net IR transfer from the surface, 40 to Space, 23 weakly-absorbed H2O bands ~2 km absorption depth.

No professional pysicist or engineer accepts the Perpetual Motion Machine of the 2nd Kind in the IPCC models, nor the final cheat GISS hid from you for 33 years! The PMM is easily proved. To imaginary 333 W/m^2 'back radiation' is added 238.5 W/m^2 Solar energy. 238.5 W/m^2 leaves as Outgoing Long Wave Radiation. As modellers assume OLR comes from a separate -18 deg C zone, radiating up and down, the '2-stream' thermal balance is 238.5 + 333 - 238.5 = 333 W/m^2.

The 40% extra, 94.5 W/m^2 is supposed to go mainly into oceans, slight increase of Sea Surface Temperature heating the atmosphere. More evaporation, higher humidity, absorbs more surface IR, giving more 'back radiation'; amplification.

But more evaporation requires higher SST than real. They fixed this by using in 'hind-casting' to past temperatures about 35% more low level cloud albedo than reality. This makes the underneath of clouds cooler. Evaporation is non linear, the models pretend average temperatures are correct but much more evaporation in the sunlit regions gives the imaginary increase in humidity.

Whoever programmed this cheat was clever because with correct IR physics, there is no net surface IR in the main GHG bands, no amplification; atmospheric processes make residual CO2-AGW near zero. There is no problem from warming or ocean acidification; they coped with 12x present [CO2] levels in the past.

The evidence is no lower atmosphere warming for 18 years; no 'missing heat'. The person who caused this mess was Carl Sagan who misled US atmospheric Science. Over here, Houghton whose treatise 'Physics of Atmospheres', Fig. 2.5. shows why Sagan was wrong to believe Arrhenius, has pushed that scam by his support for the IPCC. The bottom line: Climat science alarmists are fraudsters.

Anyone who bothers to look at the real world data on climate would never suspect that CO2 has ever played a role in changing Earth's climate over geologic time.

The IPCC continues to sound the same old boring climate alarmism based on climate models. But there is actually no real evidence to support a coming climate catastrophe. Natural climate variability has always been responsible for Earth's changing climate.

The slight increase in global average temperature since the 1800s is in line with natural climate variability. It is absolutely impossible for human-activity CO2, which is only responsible for about 0.12% of the greenhouse effect, to be causing dangerous global warming or to be the key driver of climate change. It is simply incompatible with the overwhelming body of scientific literature on natural climate variability.

RELATED POSTS:

Climate alarmists cheating?

Climate Science Fraud: Feynman Said ...

by Godel's New best Friend

The physicist Richard Feynman said that it doesn't matter how smart or powerful you are, if your hypothesis is contradicted by the empirical data, you need a new hypothesis. The anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis claims that the increasing level of carbon dioxide (co2) due to human activities causes global warming. However, there is no evidence linking co2 increase to global warming. During the past few decades, as co2 continually increased, there have been both cooling and warming periods. In fact, with co2 at its highest level in a very long time, there’s been no additional increase in global temperature for almost two decades. The co2 level has been steadily increasing since the mid 1800s. Also, the science is clear that co2 ability to contribute to warming diminishes as its level increases. An old experiment which showed increased temperature by adding more co2 to an enclosed container is hardly adequate for making assumptions about weather related activities in the open atmosphere.

Take the lie, "The "seas are rising!". The seas have been rising for the past 18,000 years, since the last (real) ice age began melting (except possibly for a few hundred years of reversal during the more recent Little Ice Age). Sea level has risen 400+ feet. The current annual sea level rise is a miniscule 1 to 3 mm per YEAR! (1 mm = .0393701 inches.) The rate of increase has been diminishing for the past several thousand years.

Some perspective helps. There have been 13 ice ages in the past 1.3 million years, average duration of each being 90,000 years. Each ice age was followed by a warming period, (commonly called an interglacial period, such as the one we now enjoy) average duration 10,000 years. When there is no further increase in sea level and when glaciers are no longer shrinking, it’s a good bet that the next ice age or, at least a Little Ice Age, is underway. (Neither is desirable, even for the very adaptable human species.)

Actual data clearly demonstrates that extreme weather events (typhoons, hurricanes, tornados, floods, droughts) have been less frequent and less severe during the past few decades. The only conclusion which can be drawn from this is that weather is more pleasant when the earth is warmer. Even most scientists who otherwise back AGW are embarrassed by the un-informed folks who continue to blame these common weather events on human-caused global warming. The UN’s IPCC, (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in its most recent report, admitted there is no indication that co2 level has any impact on our climate insofar as bizarre weather events.

The IPCC has also now finally recognizes (once again !) that our global temperature is a record level over the past 800 years. That declaration is a back-handed admission that the Medieval Warming Period (MWP) was both a global event and warmer than now. No surprise, since there have been numerous studies from around the globe confirming this. If there is some ambiguity between the IPCC actual report and its “summary” report, keep in mind that funding for the IPCC would instantly disappear if it had identified our current warming as merely natural climate variation.

Clearly human activity was not responsible for climate during the MWP. At that time the co2 level was constant (and lower, around 280 ppmv.) What’s more, the earlier warming periods during this interglacial, before the MWP, were at even higher temperatures. So our current warming is well within the bounds of natural climate variation.

The beginning of our current warming (such as it is) is invariably associated with the beginning of the industrial revolution (mid 1800s) and the associated rise in co2 level. But there is no justification for that cherry-picked start-date. Our current warming actually began, by definition, at the bottom (the low temperature) of the Little Ice Age, which took place during the mid 1600s. That implies two centuries of natural warming BEFORE the industrial revolution and before co2 began to increase.

The only known correlation between global temperature and co2 variation is over geologic periods and during that era temperature variations always occurred first, and were reflected hundreds of years later, by similar variations in co2 level. That is the carbon cycle at work. Because of oceans’ much greater heat capacity than the atmosphere oceans cool and warm much more slowly. Oceans outgas when warmer, and absorb gas when cooler. Notice that the two recent periods of cooling or flat temperature both cover significantly longer durations than was needed for alarmists to claim the warming is due to human activity. Nonetheless those same alarmists now argue that two decades of temperature “hiatus” is not long enough to refute the AGW hypothesis. There is no indication that increasing co2 has ever had any impact on global temperature, and in the more distant past co2 has been 10 to 20 times higher than now. Co2 has also been much higher during two ice ages and going into once ice age, so neither does there appear to be any nearby “trigger”.

Is the greenhouse gas theory applicable to our atmosphere? The barriers in a real greenhouse confine heat much more effectively than our open atmosphere and satellite measurements show that heat is escaping to space.

All the computer models projecting global warming assume that the real greenhouse gas culprit is water vapor. Water vapor, according to the models’ authors, supposedly provides a positive feedback, bringing on temperature increases 2 to 3 times greater than was brought on by increasing co2. But the feedback assumption is speculative at best because NO ONE yet understands climate feedbacks. In fact, cloud cover, one aspect of water vapor, likely provides a negative (offsetting) feedback. Sufficient time has now passed to show that practically every imaginable computer model scenario has grossly over-estimated actual temperature increase. In any case, computer model output is NOT evidence of anything apart from demonstrating the understanding, and agenda or confirmation bias of its authors!

Co2 is a trace gas, and represents 4/100 of one percent, by volume, of the atmosphere. This is also referred to as 400 parts per million by volume (ppmv), or .0004. The recent average annual increase in co2 is about 2 ppmv (.000002). The administration is promising to reduce US emissions by 17% over the next several years. But the economic analysis, using the alarmists’ own numbers, indicates that the cost to our economy (which does not take into account the impact on other countries) would be enormous, and, even assuming success, would have an impact on temperature too miniscule to even measure. Such a policy is likely to lead to a massive disruption - hundreds of billions (if not trillions) in cost and NO IMPROVEMENT! This has to be obvious to everyone but rent-seekers.

There has not been even one coherent attempt at rebuttal of the issues raised herein In fact, many of the alarmists still deny that global temperature has stalled or that bizarre weather is still natural climate variation. So far the only response to questions or criticism of AGW involve circular logic, name-calling, "appeals to authority" (hardly relevant when it is “authority” which is in question), “consensus” claims, or that the science is “settled”. Michael Mann (infamous "hockey stickgraph" author) responds to scientific criticisms by ignoring the facts presented, and instead asks whether the reader prefers to have their gall bladder taken out by a dentist rather than a surgeon. Science is never settled and certainly not decided by votes. The “consensus” claims are invariably based on completely debunked surveys. In any other situation such ‘consensus” studies would have long-since been exposed as major embarrassments for both the authors and the involved institutions.

It is clear that human activity is contributing to the increase in carbon dioxide. However, some perspective, again, is needed. By 2099 the co2 level is projected to reach 600 ppmv (this assumes a continuation of the annual increase of 2ppmv per year). A crowded gym with poor venting is likely to be at 1,000 ppmv. Submarine crews work, for months, in atmospheres of 3,000 to 5,000+ ppmv. Plants LOVE the increased co2 level and, in that environment, require less water and will provide more oxygen. Scientists have also acknowledged that lifeforms not unlike our own survived in co2 levels which were many times higher than now. Some scientists have concluded that the optimum level for co2 would be about 4 times higher than it is now.

Skeptics of these alarmist claims are at least as interested in saving the planet as the alarmists – we have grandchildren too. There is time, and technology will likely come up with sensible solutions long before the co2 level becomes a problem. In the meantime, we will all enjoy a healthier environment. Invoking the “precautionary principle” to address an implausible hypothesis would likely bring on catastrophic economic results. Do not permit the politicians and alarmists to foist this hobgoblin on us!

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

Climate Change Scam: Green energy costs 'far higher than ministers admit'
How long have our family of blogs and websites been telling you Global Warming / climate change was a scam, a load of pseudo scienfific scaremongering generated by charlatans in the service of their political clients and a globalist agenda. It seems almost every day now we are reporting another reputable scientist or organisation coming over to our side. A new report published today exposes government . academic lies about the cost of green power ...

Will New German Study End Global Warming Hysteria? Although evidence that the global warming scare has been a massive scam in which exponents of various typoes of dodgy science lumped together under the label of climate science, in order to justify massive taxes on everything (because everything in the modern economy involves oil or electricity at some stage) and create a $1trillion per year market for Inventment Bankers and Dr. Evil types such as Al Gore could steal more money from ordinary people, politicians, media contributors and of course science academics have stuck to the narrative.

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad]

Bad News for the alarmists: 'Missing Heat' from Non-Existent 'Global Warming' isn't Hiding in the Ocean After All

by Xavier Connolly - 7 October, 2014

Stranded? Eff off - I'm looking for the missing heat the climate models say is here" (Source)

The already mortaly wounded cause of climate ~~taxes~~ alarmism has bean dealt another blow in a new study published by a NASA research project carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, USA.

Satellite observations and empirical measurements gathered by Argo temperature probes enabled the NASA team to calculate temperature variations and thermal expansion in ocean waters over 6000 feet deep.

They found that contrary to the 'scientific consensus' that global warming apparently stopped 18 years ago because the missing heat predicted by computer models had been absorbed by the deep oceans, according to the new study the depths have not warmed significantly for ten years.

This presents zealots for the religion of virtual reality with a big problem; the "missing heat" was, they assured us, hiding in the deep oceans, because their infallible mathematical models of the ecosphere said it must be somewhere. This has been their favourite get out when presented with scientificlly rigourous proof that the real world global mean temperature ("global warming") has been static the past 18 years.

NASA Study Finds Earth's Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

The cold waters of Earth's deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years.

Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from 2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably. Study coauthor Josh Willis of JPL said these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself.

"The sea level is still rising," Willis noted. "We're just trying to understand the nitty-gritty details."

In the 21st century, greenhouse gases have continued to accumulate in the atmosphere, just as they did in the 20th century, but global average surface air temperatures have stopped rising in tandem with the gases. The temperature of the top half of the world's ocean -- above the 1.24-mile mark -- is still climbing, but not fast enough to account for the stalled air temperatures.

Many processes on land, air and sea have been invoked to explain what is happening to the "missing" heat. One of the most prominent ideas is that the bottom half of the ocean is taking up the slack, but supporting evidence is slim. This latest study is the first to test the idea using satellite observations, as well as direct temperature measurements of the upper ocean. Scientists have been taking the temperature of the top half of the ocean directly since 2005, using a network of 3,000 floating temperature probes called the Argo array.

"The deep parts of the ocean are harder to measure," said JPL's William Llovel, lead author of the study, published Sunday, Oct. 5 in the journal Nature Climate Change. "The combination of satellite and direct temperature data gives us a glimpse of how much sea level rise is due to deep warming. The answer is -- not much."

The study took advantage of the fact that water expands as it gets warmer. The sea level is rising because of this expansion and water added by glacier and ice sheet melt.

Continue reading the NASA report:

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad]

BH endorsed by Skeptical Science
Barry Woods points me to this Skeptical Science thread (reproduced at Brandon's site), in which yours truly is discussed.

Climate Change is Not Our Fault, So Let’s Just Deal With It, says California Professor

Once again its time to say I told you so. Sciencology cult followers will no doubt say "Once report does not prove your case. That is exactly what they have said in response to all the hunreds of other properly set up scientific studies that have said the same. All I can say to them is if one repost does not prove our case, how come one hockey stick is supposed to prove theirs?

from National Parks Traveller

Climate Is Changing, And Some Parks Are Endangered, But Humans Aren't The Cause - Daniel Botkin

Climate change is happening – but not because of human activity, Daniel Botkin, professor Emeritus in the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at University of California Santa Barbara has said. Moreover, the focus on man-made global warming is detracting attention from real environmental disasters to nature’s detriment, he has argued.

Botkin challenges the conclusions reached by the Union of Concerned Scientists in their paper National Landmarks at Risk, How Rising Seas, Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished Historic Sites, not least because they’ve taken the standard reports from the IPCC and others, “treating them as accurate and true,” and then used those results to look at the possible outcome for various national parks.

“The point of the report, its opening theme and its major conclusion, is that these historic places are in trouble and it’s our fault, we have been the bad guys interfering with nature and therefore damaging places we value,” Botkin says, before methodically knocking down each assertion as demonstrably false.

Climate models linking human CO2 output to rising temperatures are unreliable, he writes. “Conclusion: our addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere does not appear to be increasing Earth’s temperature. Whatever is happening to Earth’s climate does not seem to be our fault.”

However, he does acknowledge that climate change is happening. Taking sea level as an example, he says: “the sea level has been rising since the end of the last Ice Age, starting about 14,000 years ago as the continental and mountain glaciers have melted and sea water has expanded with the overall warming. The average rate has been about a foot or two a century”.

The question he poses is: what to do about it? Rather than spending time arguing over the causes of climate change, Botkin advocates simply rolling up our sleeves and dealing with the outcome, harking back to Frederick Law Olmstead, who in the mid 1800s, created the Back Bay Fens on Boston’s shoreline as a way to manage both ocean floods, deal with waste water for the city, and create a recreational area for city dwellers.

“Confronted with the combined problems of ocean surges and flooding from river runoff inland, Olmsted did not waste his time complaining about whether or not people have caused the problem. He just set out and solved it.”

However, he saves his most damning criticism for the UCS’s treatment of wildfire frequency. The report claims two national park sites are at particular risk of damage from increasingly frequent wildfires, despite the fact that the evidence shows no increase.

“Furthermore”, he writes, “it is well-established that most major wildfires that occur these days are from the failure to allow much more frequent, and therefore light fires, to burn. The 20th century policy dominated by Smokey Bear — “only you can prevent forest fires” — and the belief, ill-founded, that all forest and grassland fires are bad and must be prevented — have had a damaging effect.”

‘Damaging’ is an understatement – in fact, the policy caused the extinction of Kirtland’s warbler, a bird which nests in young jack pines, which only regenerate after a fire.

Climate activists Claim US Deep Freeze Is Due To Global Warming

Kit Daniels, Prison Planet

As 44 US states brace for snow in the coming week, multiple “climate change” articles have been published recently which attempt to attribute the record cold – or any change in climate for that matter – to “global warming.”

An op/ed published yesterday, for example, suggested the freezing temperatures throughout the U.S. are an “indirect result of the world getting warmer.”

“Global warming could be making parts of the world colder,” the author claimed, even though the phrase “global warming” refers to the entire world getting warmer, not just specific parts of it.

The author even attributed the record-level ice in Antarctica to “global warming.”

“Warmer temperatures are not only causing more snowfall in Antarctica, scientists believe, but could also be producing more sea ice,” he stated.

The op/ed did not resonate well with readers.

“These so called experts haven’t a clue what is going on, but politicians know exactly what is happening – the greatest opportunity to control the masses ever presented,” one reader, Steve Nosympathy, commented. “Never before has such an opportunity presented where the government can steal huge amounts from the public by instilling fear.”

A similar article published today by The Energy Collective blamed “global warming” for “extreme weather.”

“Global warming is worsening,” the article harked. “It seems that new reports appear with increasing frequency emphasizing the worsening of global warming due to increased accumulation of manmade greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere.”

“They show that extreme weather or climate events already appear to be more severe and/or frequent than in the past, and will continue to worsen.”

Of course, none of this corresponds to what the largest proponent of global warming, Al Gore, has said in the past.

“…Science is warning us that if we do not quickly reduce the global warming pollution that is trapping so much of the heat our planet normally radiates back out of the atmosphere, we are in danger of creating a permanent ‘carbon summer,’” Gore proclaimed during his Nobel Lecture in 2007.

He also famously predicted the North Pole would be ice-free by 2013, but instead ice sheets expanded to record levels that year.

“Satellite photos of the Arctic taken by NASA in August 2012 and August 2013 show a 60 percent increase in the polar ice sheet, more than half the size of Europe, despite ‘realistic’ predictions by climate scientists six years ago that the North Pole would be completely melted by now,” reported CNS News.

It’s hilarious that climate activists claim the “science is settled” and “global warming is real” yet over and over again their predictions are proven patently false.

CREATIVE COMMONS: attrib, no comm, no dervs.
KEYWORDS: news, opinion, dailystirrer,

If you liked this, please give it a boost

Close Window and return to previous URL

Skip RSS Feeds and go to Greenteeth Menu Panel

News Feeds (Go back to top)

BBC News

CNN

British Democracy In Terminal Decline - Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year - And things are worse elsewhere.

Climate: The Science, The Lies, The Malfeasance and The Deep State - Contents

Climate Change Updates

Climate Emergency Not Supported by Data, Say Four Leading Italian Scientists

Massive Coral Growth on Australia's the Great Barrier Reef Discredits Predictions of Climate Change Doom Merchants

New UN Report on Climate Change – Nothing New, Nothing True

California’s Left Wing Governor Implies People Need To Be Brainwashed Into Believing In Climate Change

Climate Change: Is There A Holy Grail Of Sustainable Energy Sources

Hurricane Harvey Climate Catastrophe Man Made?

More bad news for warmists: NASA finds no retreat of polar ice

NASA Data Proves Trump Right to Exit Paris Climate Accord

Kit Daniels viaInfowars

Merkel Furious After Trump Refusal To Toe The Party Line Causes G-7 Failure To Agree To Agree On Climate Change

Germany Facing Mass Blackouts Because The Wind And Sun Won’t Cooperate

The Global Warming Scam Is A Weapon In The War On Free Speech

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax

Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA

by James Taylor in Forbes.com

As Global Government Geeks Push For Paris Climate Deal, New Report throws More Doubt On Climate Science

Return to contents table

IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables

Environmental Economists Claim Fossil Fuels Receive Large Subsidies

Polar Temperature Data ‘Proving’ Climate Change Nothing More than a Guess

by Hurricane Hughes - climate correspondent, 15 May, 2015

UN IPCC Climate Change Report Will Warn Of 'Severe, Pervasive' Effects Of Global Warming

That is, the refusal of the climate to deliver scaremongering predictions will have the severe and pervasive effect of exposing climate science as a sham

Renewable Energy: So Useless That Even Green Loons At Google Have Given up on it

Climate Change: CO2 Is Less Significant Than An Ant's Fart

by Arthur Foxake - 9 November, 2014

The Wonderful, Climate Science Defying Vikings

Science Fraud And The Climate Perpetual Motion Engine

Xavier Connolly

Climate Science Fraud: Feynman Said ...

by Godel's New best Friend

Bad News for the alarmists: 'Missing Heat' from Non-Existent 'Global Warming' isn't Hiding in the Ocean After All

by Xavier Connolly - 7 October, 2014

NASA Study Finds Earth's Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed

Climate Change is Not Our Fault, So Let’s Just Deal With It, says California Professor

Climate Is Changing, And Some Parks Are Endangered, But Humans Aren't The Cause - Daniel Botkin

Climate activists Claim US Deep Freeze Is Due To Global Warming

500K Adverse Events Reported After COVID Vaccines In The US Alone

September 2021

10 September 2021: The Left is lying to itself, it needs limited migration as much as the Right does.

The Illusion Of Stability, The Inevitability Of Collapse

August 2021

July 2021

E U Central Bank Digital Currency Is The Death Rattle Of A Failed Experiment

To review more of our recent posts visit Greenteeth Back Index 35

Latest Posts - November 2014

26 November

25 November

24 November

23 November

21 November

20 November

18 November

17 November

16 November

15 November

14 November

13 November

12 November

11 November

10 November

9 November

8 November

7 November

6 November

5 November

4 November

3 November

2 November

1 November

Don't hold French stocks says former broker Farage as our Gallic neighbour sinks deeper into the Euroshite

Menu