Editor's note: The Daily Stirrer believes in the universal right of free speech, this does not mean we necessarily agree with the views expressed by our contributors.
Apologies for erratic posting recently, our main contributors have all been diagnosed as suffering from CCRF and BLMRDS(Chronic COVID reporting syndrome and Black Lives Matter Racism Derangement Sytnrome)
Technocrat scientists experiment because they can, not because there is a demonstrated need to do so. Genetic splicing between species is becoming more common and accepted. Few are assessing the physical dangers or ethical implications. ? TN Editor
Scientists have made monkeys brains bigger by splicing them with human genes in an experiment reminiscent of The Planet of the Apes.
Experts took the gene known as ARHGAP11B – which directs stem cells in the human brain – and placed it into the brains of common marmosets.
The experiment ended up with the monkey fetuses having larger, more advanced, and more-human like brains, according to the study published in Science.
Scientists however opted to abort the fetus due to possible “unforeseen consequences”.
It echoes the plot of the Planet of the Apes movies series, in which a new race of genetically modified intelligent primates takeover the Earth.
Mankind carries out experiments on apes to make them smarter, only for human society to them collapse as the creatures rise up against them.
Humans are then left living in a primitive and tribal society which is hunted and caged by the very creatures they helped create.
The Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics in Germany and the Central Institute for Experimental Animals in Japan carried out the new experiments ... Continue reading >>>RELATED:
Another 'Scientific Consensus' Turns Out To Be Corporate / Government Scam
So there are no scientists in the world who question the corporate lieOpen Letter from World Scientists to All Governments Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). The World Scientists Statement dates from 1999. It was superceded by the Independent Science Panel Report in 2003, and by the most recent report Ban GMOs Now in 2013.
'No Monsanto!': Protest Against GMO Food Goes Global
Thousands took to streets across the world’s cities on Saturday to protest the use of GMO products, with Giant Monsanto being the main target. Over 50 countries have been taking part in the march for world food day, and across 47 different US states. Berlin, Strasbourg, Chicago, London, Sydney and Mumbai are just a few of the 500 cities worldwide involved in the rallies, with each one drawing hundreds.
Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease
thousands to die each year from a MYSTERY fatal kidney disease, with evidence pointing THE herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) as the primary culprit. A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health proposes a link between the herbicide known as Roundup (aka glyphosate) and a series of mysterious epidemics of fatal ... MORE
The World has Really Been Turned Upside down When We Look To Russia To Defend Our Rights
Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, the land of the free, defends corporate fascism, even when it threatens the future of western civilisation. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, a nation with a long history of authoritarianism and tyranny, stands up for human rights and putting protection of the environment ahead of corporate power and profit. What's going on?
New Study Shows Toxins In GMOs Are Poisonous To Mammals
More evidence that Gemetically Modified organisms are totally unsuitable to be part of the human or animal food chain. When will the message sink in that our politicians and "experts" who advise them just steal our tax money on behalf of fascist corporations like Monsanto.
Are 90% Of Cancer Research Studies Fraudulent?
A shocking report published in nature magazine has revealed that up to 89% of cancer research studies may be fraudulent. In that many cases the results reported were not reproducable and were in the interests of Pharmaceutical and healthcare corporations rather than cancer sufferers. It is not clear in how many cases the researchers were knowingly dishonest and how many were just stupid ...
Diabetes skyrockets across America as Big Pharma drugs fail yet again
In spite of year on year increases in medication usage rates for preventing and treating Type II diabetes, the condition is becoming more prevalent throughout the U.S.A., according to a new study published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Between 1995 and 2010, the number of people diagnosed with diabetes in nearly half of all the U.S. states more than doubled, ...
Diabetes skyrockets across America as Big Pharma drugs fail yet again
Death By Genocidally Modified Food
The now notorious Monsanto Protection Act, recently passed by the US Congress, which gives biotech corporations, particularly Monsanto immunity from criminal or civil prosecution should harm to humans or the environment arise from ...
Where’s Donald? When 40% of voters cry ‘fraud’ you’ve got a big problemBy Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog and cross-posted with Press TV
I think everybody would like 2020 to be over, and that we’d all like the US election to be over, but journalists shouldn’t stop accurately reporting just because the news is unpleasant.
“Breaking news: Plane lands safely!”
It just doesn’t work that way in life or journalism. We can’t give out participation medals and say it doesn’t really matter who won the US election.
Neither should Bidenites be calling for blacklisting both journalists and Republican public officials or successfully trying to deny Donald Trump a lawyer in Pennsylvania, but that’s another story.
A poll 227 pages long from The Economist – which will likely sink like a stone in the US Mainstream Media because it’s so very damning – reveals total US division and the devastation of its electoral integrity: 9 out of 10 Trump voters say Biden “did not legitimately win the election”, and 9 out of 10 Trump voters say, “mail ballots are being manipulated to favor Joe Biden”.
In good news, only 7 out of 10 Trump voters say that we will,” never know the real outcome of this election.” Is this the new, “Who killed JFK?” (Never getting a clear answer there surely increased political alienation among many Americans.)
Even though I relayed the findings in a manner which stresses political partisanship, this is definitely not a partisan issue: the percentages of Americans who hold the views described above are 45%, 42%, and 41%.RELATED: [Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
FEC Chairman Says He Believes 'There Is Voter Fraud' In Key States
As the whole of mainstream media continues to ridicule claims made by President Trump and his supporters of wholesale electoral fraud in the recent US election (where results in many key states have not yet been certified, indeed votes are still being counted in some of those states,) the chairman of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has come out of the closet for Trump, stating that he believes there is evidence of widespread voter fraud and other alleged electoral irregularities.
In a recent interview, FEC Chairman Trey Trainor said reports of fraud in some battleground states are credible “otherwise they would allow the [poll] observers to go in,” referring to reports of some polling areas refusing to allow GOP observers to check on the process on Election Day and the days after.
“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, you have the video... they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter. That’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers.”Trainor told Newsmax, Epoch Times reports.
In the interview, he agreed with Trump’s campaign lawsuits, while saying that questionable actions by elections officials in several states could make the election illegitimate. Which makes all those claims by mainstream media that there is no evidence to support Trump's allegation look like a pack of lies.
But there is something else about this election that stinks, several things actually, like the statements from leading Democrats in the weeks before the election about their having a plan to make sure Trump did not win the key states, the way (and this is documented,) that Republican observers were kept from watching the count when US electoral law requires that representatives of all parties are able to observe the process, but is there something in the election system itself that encourages fraud? ”
Yes, two things actually. Dishonesty and corruption; it has been known for decades that the U.S. political system is rotten to the core.. And our old - or should it be new- friend - Artificial Intelligence. Because one of the leading suspects in the fraud is a vote tallying system which is suspected of fliping Trump votes to Biden. And among those who have a financial interest in the company that developed and sells the system are two leading Democrats including the one who announced they had a plan to stop Trump (above) and also bill and Hillary Clinton.
And then there is the question of mail in votes. Postal voting can never be secure, it is an invitation to electoral fraud which is why most countries that have experimented with is quickly abandoned their projects due to problems with vote-fraud (including France, from 1975).
Why do most countries ban mail-in ballots?
Election authorities have concluded the problem with postal voting cannot be fixed.
Why did Britain increase the amount of postal voting, under Tony Blair, when the UK already had a problem with vote-fraud in general, and postal voting in particular? Can the UK have a safe democracy with so many postal votes, when just a tiny number of votes determine the outcome of an election (in 1992 just 1270 votes across eleven constituencies won the Consrevatives a fourth term in government). Perhaps the integrity of UK democracy was not foremost in Tony Blair’s mind.
The UK held their election a year ago. A year before this still-fresh in the memory US election. Boris Johnson's Conservatives won one of the most shambolic elections we have ever had, due mainly to the vast increase in mail in votes. Reports of huge batches of voting papers, all filled in with the same pen and delivered by hand rather than by The Post Office circulated, reports of vote harvesting, particularly among immigrant communities, were rife, boxes full of votes for one candidate were delivered in mystery vans after voting stations had closed, boxes of votes from areas in which the Conservatives or Brexit Party were strong went missing and there were instances of electoral districts in which more votes were cast than there were registered voters to cast them. Any of this sounding familiar?
So while it is justified to ask what the UK can learn from the chaos in the USA, American election authorities should also be asking what could the US have learned from the UK’s farce of an election. On the run up to the election, Dominic Cummings was slipped into Boris Johnson's team as ‘an advisor’ and a sort of digital chief whip who is even less trustworthy than his unpleasant countenance suggests (His Spitting Image puppet depicts him as a Vampire). If this man ever shakes your hand, be sure to count your fingers afterwards.
Cummings was, brought in as an ‘influencer’ to poush through the Brexit deal and votes. His masters were, and are, maths and data. His weapons of choice were -and are- social networks and bots. When he was brought in he made Johnson a promise. Despite Boris looking and sounding increasingly idiotic every time he opened his face, Cummings pledged not only deliver a victory, but to deliver an big majority. And to make such a bold prediction ahead of the game when Corbyn and Labour were doing well it looks even more remarkable. Even to those of us aware of the mood of disillusionment with Labour's metropolital, globalist leadrrship in the party's industrial heartlands, where voters felt "the party of the working class" had abandoned the working class in favour of minorities, globalism and wooing the support of lawyers, academics and the managerial class. It was looking like it would be a close run race until Cummings, with his expertise at using social media, stepped in.
Johnson, Cummings and their party managers all had dirty dealings with Cambridge Analytica. And that company appeared on the radar in 2016 with a similar remit involving the US election. The US and UK are two heads of one body. Ask Iran, Iraq, or Syria. They have the same masters. They share the same goals. They keep each other’s secrets.
Should Cambridge Analytica have used phrases like ”we won” when they are purportedly engaged in social research and have no political identity or party allegiance?
All this does is confirm the suspicion which has finally begun to spread among voters of our great ‘democracies’. That is, that they aren’t democracies at all, elections are a charade, voting is a confidence trick, whoever wins the election, the same people will be pulling strings behind the scenes and the policies implemented will serve the billionaires and global corporations, the banks, lawyers and academics. So what does it mean ? Very likely that those of us who suspect our leaders are chosen for us by the government that we never see or hear of.
If this past 12 months has taught us anything, it’s that no government rules their country or even leads it. They’re like school prefects. They look like they hold power but they’re doing what the school and it’s head master tells them to do. Look at the global covid game. We hear, almost weekly, how much vaccines will cost. How much countries are spending on them. We are told there must be a Great Reset to perpare us for "The New Normal" that we will face after COVID. And yet there is no evidece of the existance of this virus.
In preparation for the "new normal" of global, authoritarian government, countries have been ‘graded’ according to their economies. So in Africa and the undeveloped nations Gates labs will pay less to their vaccine developers working to prepare for the next pandemic than say the UK or France.You can guess who was responsible for the ‘grading’ of course..
But ask yourself what is going on here. A software magnates (actually a patents Magnate - Microsofts success was based on patenting ideas stolen from people who had been happy to put their work in the public domain. ‘Billionaire’ Bil Gates, the man who has never studied economics, politics, or medicine is in charge of all three across the planet right now it seems. Which kind of suggests the world will end up, socially and economically, a big an atrocity as Windows 10.
But no worries, Gate' lack of experience in medicine, finance and economics and the fact that he never wrote a real computer program in his life can be overlooked because he’s a ‘philanthropist’ who ”understands computers and stuff”. And he’s passionate about and ridding the world of diseases and non-billionaires who are- in the words of Gates and his fellow billionaire philanthropists, people such as George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Jacob Rothschild, Warren Buffet,Jack Dorsey, Michael Bloomberg, ted Turner and Jeff Bezos, and the rest, all of whom seem to get two dollars richer for every dollar they give away - ‘undesirables’.
So, if we’re debating, discussing, arguing or even guessing about the levels of corruption within our world’s great democratic countries, I propose we ask, and then answer for ourselves,then seek the answer the one question that will reveal all you need to know:
Well did you? .................. Now you know why our elections are such a mess these days.[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns & Releases the Real Number of COVID Patients in Her Hospital: ‘I Can’t Lie Anymore’
Source: Summit News
Picture: Screenshot from local TV
An NHS nurse in Britain publicly resigned while wearing her uniform before releasing the real numbers of COVID patients in her hospital and denouncing the government’s disastrous lockdown policy.
The whole of England officially entered lockdown 2.0 today despite numerous experts warning that lockdowns will eventually end up killing more people than coronavirus itself.
A video out of Cornwall shows a nurse in uniform giving a speech explaining why she decided to resign from her job.
NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns & Releases The Real Number Of Covid Patients In Her Hospital 'i Can’t Lie Anymore'
“I don’t need the uniform to prove that I work for them, but today, I’m publicly resigning,” she stated.
The nurse then revealed how she received an email from her bosses demanding an explanation as to why she was being critical of official COVID policy and that people were “reporting” her.
“Unfortunately I can’t lie anymore,” said the nurse, explaining how she took a screenshot of internal hospital data showing there were just three people across three hospitals in the region infected with COVID.
The total deaths from these three hospitals across the last 7 months is just 76 people, roughly 10 deaths a month, according to the nurse, who questioned why it was necessary for her region to go into lockdown given such sparse figures.
“I’ve decided there’s no point, I have gone against the rules within the NHS, I have shared confidential information that people need to see,” said the nurse, adding that other doctors and nurses were trying to speak out.[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
Matteo Salvini Asks Why Italians Get Lockdowns, Migrants Get ‘Open Ports’from Breitbart Europe
Picture: Albertto Pizzoli, AFP / Getty
The leader of Italy’s Lega party has raged against a double standard whereby Italian citizens are getting “fines and lockdowns” whereas illegal immigrants get “open ports.”
The government of Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte has raised fines to unprecedented levels for those who break the nation’s mask mandate and other new restrictions on personal freedoms, while migrants continue to stream into the country unimpeded on a daily basis, Mr. Salvini complains.
In a Monday morning Facebook post, Salvini notes some 400 migrants arrived from north Africa to the Italian island of Lampedusa on Sunday followed by another three boats with 200 more migrants that landed Monday.
Apparently, the Prime Minister’s health edicts “do not apply” to migrants, Salvini wrote.
The Lega leader has also voiced his opposition to new lockdown measures, insisting that the remedy would be worse than the disease.
“I hope that a new total closure will not be reached because it would be a real economic, social and emotional disaster,” he wrote on Facebook. “Are there any alternatives? Yes, home care because often the remedy risks being worse than the disease.”
In a strange irony, media revealed last Friday that the Tunisian immigrant Brahim Issaoui who stabbed three people to death in the southern French church of Notre Dame while shouting “Allahu akbar” had arrived on the same island of Lampedusa on September 20 before heading north to France where he carried out his attack ... Continue reading >>>[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
Backlash Against Big Tech was a Long Time Coming
William A Jacobson, Newsweek, 20 October
Last week, social media websites prevented users from sharing a bombshell report from the New York Post outlining how the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden had personally enriched himself by connecting international interests to the Obama administration. The Post had obtained details about Hunter Biden's business dealings with a Ukrainian energy firm, as well as a library of images depicting his controversial lifestyle and substance abuse, from a computer repair center in Delaware.
In subsequent stories, the public learned of additional credible allegations about Hunter Biden, including that he used his family connections to arrange meetings for Chinese Communist Party officials and business associates with the Obama administration, which his father, then the vice president, attended. All of these demonstrate the very real benefit Hunter Biden, and possibly his father, derived from the political access he enjoyed. As the country approaches election day, such corruption is important for the American voter to consider, especially as Joe Biden pursues the presidency.
Unfortunately, the mainstream media don't seem to agree. Following the publication of the New York Post story, they worked overtime to insist that it could be Russian disinformation for the purposes of election meddling ...Continue reading >>>
Free Speech being superseded by Sharia Law in Germany?In Germany, where the open doors immigration policy insisted upon by Chancellor Merkel has flooded the country with Islamic fundamentalists, Christian activist Heidi Mund was recently charged with “agitation against the people” for speaking our on aspects of Muslim Sharia Law that are unacceptable in western societies (e.g. permitted wife beating, rape, forced marriage.Germany is sliding towards fascism as Hausfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel outlaws free speech for Christians. All criticism of Islam and discussion of Muslim crimes is hate speech it seems, but the ranting of Islamic hate preachers as they call on Muslims to kill all infidels is acceptable rhetoric.
Why Are Governments Scared Of Truth? France Begins
Crackdown on Conspiracy TheoriesWe reported several weeks ago that the French government was planning a clampdown on conspiray theories by shutting down certain dissident websites. Since then we have learned the French government have shown they are prepared to go even further in attacking citizens right of free speech, they are now shutting down sites that question the government's ability to deal with the immigration crisis, the problem of Islamic extremism, the country's dire economic situation or burgeoning unemployment.
Why Are Governments Scared Of Truth? France Begins Crackdown on Conspiracy Theories
Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think og the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content. Fortunately there are plenty of libertarians out there (we classical liberals have to call ourselves libertarian since the new, politically correct Stalinists hijacked the word liberal) who will help you find the stuff governments don't want you to see. It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think of the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content (and helps you get around the censorship).
Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
Facebook labels 2+2=4 “misinformation”
Oct 20, 2020 8:50 PM
On the 5th of October, the WHO’s Dr Michale Ryan claimed “about 10%” of the global population had been infected with Sars-Cov-2. With an alleged death toll of roughly 1 million, that puts the infection-fatality ratio at roughly 0.14%. The maths is not disputable. And yet Facebook has flagged it as “misinformation”.
The Facebook claim is based on an article by Health Feedback, an “independent” fact-checker, which is shoddy, inaccurate and dishonest.
They ignore all the most recent IFR studies. Literally dozens of studies have been done on the IFR of Sars-Cov-2 to this point, many of them published and peer-reviewed in just the last few weeks. The average IFR in these studies has been much lower than 0.68% (usually between 0.1 and 0.2).
The “recent studies” healthfeedback cite are from June at the latest. They also never mention the immunological studies which suggest up to 80% of people may already have mucosal or cellular-based immunity, potentially dropping the IFR even further.
These factcheckers don’t even know how averages work. Health Feedback claim: "the 0.14% IFR estimate fails to account for the extensive IFR variability between populations due to a different distribution of risk factors such as age, ethnicity, access to healthcare, and underlying health conditions in each population."
This is is total nonsense. Of course the IFR accounts for those differences. Some people are more at risk from Covid than others, some people are at almost no risk. The IFR takes those differences into account, and produces an average overall chance of death. That’s how averages work.
This is why I recently suggested that arguing over the finer points of data analysis and any numbers crunched was an exercise in futility. It’s an argument that can’t be won as the figures, the projections and the data have all been false from the beginning because the agenda was to scare the public into handing over their rights in exchange for a rescue package that isn’t really needed. And, of course, we know that much of the data was extracted from hospitals, dishonest doctors and seats of learning who provided the graphs and numbers in exchange for money and immunity from prosecution.Only exposing the truth ( if working within the medical community) is costly. Not only do you receive no blood money, you stop receiving salary and become ostracised by peers ( who are still accepting ‘donations’ to keep up the narrative).
These fact checkers are having to work far too hard to deconstruct a narrative by unpicking numbers.Far too hard. A lie is a lie and a truth is a truth. This is a torturous maths lesson in the name of desperation.And, if they’re so desperate to promote this truth that big money is changing hands, then you can use common sense to work out why.
The conversations should be about incidents that have happened, lies that have been witnessed by the public. Lies either printed in papers available to the public, spoken in public or exposed in public. A little like the Neal Ferguson lies of over a decade ago and repeated 9 months ago for a new narrative. What say you, Fact checkers. Where is that creature now ? He needs to be put on trial. Or has Uncle Bill been greasing the wheels again….
Facebook. A beacon of transparency and entertainment with a CEO who used to be a body double for several Muppet characters and kept Kermit’s voice and intellect.
This is the power of branding . A recognisable brand can say so much. Had the CIA put one of their middle aged psychopaths front and centre to sell Facebook on behalf of their Nazi paymasters, too many people would have perceived the aroma of a rodent.
But had they realised back then that the same CIA had been beavering away on a huge and expensive project to collect the data of as many people on the planet as possible( covertly of course) they may have caught that aroma anyway. . It was called Lifelog. It was abandoned on Feb 4th 2004. Facebook was launched that day. Check it- fact checkers. Then explain the last decades growing mountain of evidence that it’s still stealing people’s privacy and selling it on.Coincidence? Ain’t that a fact..
But the masses saw this innocent dope student who was sold as ‘cool’ because he’d dropped out and invented Facebook ‘for you guys’ to share and meet and make invisible friends.For his trouble he was made a very dull billionaire. He’s had more handlers than Madonna’s knickers.
Google have also joined the party.They refused to remove the ‘youtube’ brand because people love youtube. So it paid to keep the recognisable brand rather than call it CIA tube.
The Nazi’s did it in 45. They realised they had many brand semiotics burned into the global psyche ; all the uniforms and flags and marches.You see those you think Eugenics, Genocide, and world domination. They were a very naughty lot.
In 1945 the Americans rescued them( thanks America) as we all watched the lesser ones hang( check that fact, fact checkers). Their new ‘brand’ is a star spangled banner. They merely write the plans and do the work now .The user-friendly WW2 heroes carry out their plan .A brand you can trust.They kept the Eagle.Business as usual..
Here’s a fact i find relevant to the current obsession with trying to destroy the truth. It involves that other brand people trust – the WHO. The World Health Organisation is really the World Genocide Programme.But that, despite being quite catchy, might have raised an eyebrow or two.So we play along, despite the ‘fact’ that the blood in the veins of this beast is the Gates river of dollars.The very same Gates who wants to murder most of the population so they can grow more daffodils.
Back in the 1970s, the game moved up a few gears. The crazy bastards like Gallo et al were getting a bit too busy with their breeding of old and new viruses and mixing and matching.It was all covert( as regard to the public being aware).But the Governments knew.After all, they enjoyed tens of thousands dying. And if they could do it with out making a racket and breaking things, all the more fun.
In 1972 The World Health Organization (W.H.O.) published a proposal:
“An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function, e.g., by …affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens.”(Bulletin of the W.H.O., vol. 47, p 257- 274.)
This is a clinical description of the function of the AIDS virus.
There’s a fact to check, Fact checkers.? Mid-1970’s
The incidence of AIDS infections in Africa coincides exactly with the locations of the W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program in the mid-1970’s (London Times, May 11, 1987). Some 1The 4,000 Haitians then on UN secondment to Central Africa were also vaccinated in this campaign.
Knock yourself out, fact checkers.
The virus section of Fort Detrick’s Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Branding again.Ever see the word ‘cure’ in Cancer Research literature or advertising campaigns before you made a donation? me neither…
Keep your eyes open. The stake are high in this game now.And you can’t get back any time you waste.
Silence the ‘anti-vaxxers’? Enlist celebrities, religious leaders? Bill Gates warns US needs to reduce ‘vaccine hesitancy’
Billionaire software tycoon Bill Gates has urged the US to prepare for a Covid-19 vaccine rollout by deputizing trusted community leaders to “reduce vaccine hesitancy,” bemoaning the rapid spread of “conspiracy theories” online.
The Microsoft founder-turned-vaccine-evangelist painted a mostly rosy picture of a vaccine rollout getting “rich countries” back to normal by the end of 2021 in an interview during the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council on Tuesday.
However, with less than half of Americans saying they’d get a Covid jab – even if paid $100 for it – in a recent survey, Gates then focused his talk on enlisting the nation’s “trust network” to overcome the skeptics.
As usual the arrogance of Bill Gates prevents him from understanding that as one of the main advocates (and likely benificiaries) of a COVID vaccine, his well documented support for policies like eugenics and population reduction might be a factor in fuelling peole's resistance to a Coronavirus vaccine.We only have to ask people in India, various parts of Africa and other places that have had the dubious benefit of Gates Foundation mass vaccination projects what they thing of Mr. Gates' "philantropy" to understand why so many people are wary of any vaccine this man has anything to do with.
Gates has previously warned that the “final hurdle” to a vaccine-fuelled return to normalcy is convincing the population to actually roll up their sleeves and take the jab(s), and the World Health Organization – of which his foundation is the single largest funder, following the US’ departure – declared “vaccine hesitancy” one of the biggest threats to world health last year. The billionaire has stated he hopes to have seven billion humans vaccinated with whatever formula proves safe and effective, but has suggested a mandate would be counterproductive and actually increase resistance to vaccines.
Lamenting that “vaccine hesitancy is in all countries and predates the pandemic,” Gates suggested American health officials start “thinking about which voices will help reduce the hesitancy, so we can get a level of vaccination that really has a chance of stopping” the virus.
Gates provided the example of challenges the polio vaccine faced in some countries – and the cunning lengths some were willing to go to get their populations jabbed.
The original plan of having a COVID vaccine made mandatory, with those who brefuse it prevented from working, travelling or sending their children to schoool has already been symied which explains why the billionaire has softened his usual authoritarian stance.
The Human Rights Court recently confirmed that Article 8 protects our physical, moral and psychological integrity, as well as our right to choose. Failing to respect someone's competent refusal of medical treatment, and providing treatment against their will, is therefore protected against by Article 8.
It is not clear why a software peddler, and a peddler of shoddy, not-fit-for-purpose software at that, has become the go-to person on global medical issues.All the companies working on this miracle vaccine for a bad cold have already won the NO liability clause from the governments that go along with the hoax. So if you end up a veggie or die or ill . Oh well too bad for you. Just like gates software . If you run it and something happens to the OS that cause monetary damage to you or your company Microsoft is not liable. All computer software has that little gift from TPTBRELATED:
[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
Covid-19 testing kits were distributed years before pandemic was declared
What motivated the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic at the time they did? How much of the pandemonium, governments’ lock downs and corporate control is an overreaction? How much of it was planned? Whose agendas do these lock downs and economic controls ultimately serve? Did you know that covid-19 testing kits were distributed before the pandemic was declared?
A group of 600 medical doctors gathered in Spain and called the covid-19 outbreak “a false pandemic” created for political purposes. Locking people down and convincing them they can spread infections they do not have is a tyrannical curse of oppression. These doctors urge other healthcare professionals, “the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.” Why are human rights being challenged during a time of human need?
In September 2019, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled, ‘A World at Risk’ which detailed how the UN and WHO conduct system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.” Why did Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates go on record about an impending pandemic, long before one was declared? Why are both these men so adamant about vaccinating the world population?
[Daily Stirrer] ... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Medium.com ]
UK must step up pace on switch to electric or risk car industry?The opening paragraph of the Daily Telegraph's latest paen to the Electric Car reads like the usual uncritical, unrealistic driven written by the amateurish geks the Telegraph passes off as technology journalists. Unfortunately wankers are attracted to technology like flies to shit so it is unreasonable perhaps to expect a tech writer to approch the subject with obectivity and critical analysis, but this? It is just propaganda:
For years they have slumbered while America’s Tesla and electric carmakers in China have raced ahead.
But the giants of European car making have finally woken up to the challenge of electrification – and they are wasting no time.
From Scandinavia to the Rhineland and the plains of south-west France, tens of billions of euros from companies including Volkswagen, BMW, PSA, BASF and others are pouring into a string of ambitious “gigafactories”.
Their goal? To make Europe a green leader in the bulk production of lithium-ion batteries on which the industry’s future depends.
The shift to electric vehicles is already reshaping the global car industry, creating both winners and losers. Like other European countries, Britain has taken a lead by ordering the complete phase out petrol and diesel car sales within 15 years.
But experts warn that if the UK cannot build a domestic supply chain for the batteries that comprise one-third of an electric car’s value, the future for car making in the UK looks bleak. Continue reading >>>
It's time the Telegraph wound up its technology department if this geeky drek is the best they can do. Musk is a con - man and only someone besotted with technology would be blind to that, Tesla Cars only survives by selling shares and taking deposits on advance orders while the waiting time gets longer and longer (and if you think that sounds like a Ponzi scheme, a lot of intelligent investors agree.) And of course they are prohibitively expensive for most drivers.
A couple of weeks ago this paper reviewed a hybrid version of a small Renault, claimed range on batteries - 30 miles, far enough for most commutes the writer added. But reduce that by 50% for normal urban driving conditions and the question is why bother cluttering up a perfectly reasonable small car with batteries, an extra motor and all the associated gadgetry?
It's always the same, when the topic is electric cars, critical thinking goes out of the window. Our generating infrastructure cannot cope with a switch to electric, our distribution grid could not cope with the charging infrastructure needed and if Li-ion batteries are the power source, there are not enough known resources of essential materials for the whole world to switch.
If we replace all of the UK vehicle fleet with EVs, and assuming they use the most resource-frugal next-generation batteries, we would need the following materials:
207,900 tonnes of cobalt – just under twice the annual global production;
264,600 tonnes of lithium carbonate – three-quarters of the world’s production;
at least 7,200 tonnes of neodymium and dysprosium – nearly the entire world production of neodymium;and
2,362,500 tonnes of copper – more than half the world’s production in 2018.
Put simply, we lack the ability to provide the infrastructure required to deliver electric cars and electric heating on the scale required by 2050.”
There is enough oil in the ground worldwide, proven and estimated potential, to last for more than 200 years.
But the climate change eco-falacy is that oil and car emissions are what is driving up the temperature - research into thousands of ice cores going back hundreds of thousands of years shows that rising CO2 levels lag behind temperature increases by about 900-1,000 years, about 900-1,000 years ago there was a worldwide temperature rise - there were no gas guzzlers or HGVs or gas central heating systems around then - but the truth on the fundamental causes of climate change has been beaten into obscurity by eco-radicals and their green agenda.
(The children and adults in the illegal mines digging out the rare earths for the batteries will be delighted when we finally get our green cars that we can't go anywhere in because there is not enough electricity because it's cloudy and the wind has dropped and we are too busy freezing in our all electric homes eating baked beans from the can.
In any case, travel will have been priced out of the range of all but the richest (Soros and his cronies) or the privileged (all our rulers from whichever is on our throne to the vilest tin pot dictator in one of the less white (and therefore much better) countries than ours).
Not to mention that all white male over a certain age will be confined to their homes (or camps for those who have not yet completed their unconscious bias training) so that they cannot parade their white privilege. There will be a sliding scale of restrictions for other whites depending on age and gender (or is it sex?). Better start self identifying as female now guys.)
While idiot Californian politicians might talk of banning I.C.E. vehicles by 2025, the end of oil is more likely 50 years away than 5.
Eliminating fossil fuels to produce electricity or power automobiles would not support life as we know it today but only life as we knew it a century and a half ago. It may also be time to rename the electric cars, beloved by many, to what they really are, coal, natural gas or nuclear powered cars. The emissions are simply shifted from the exhaust pipe to the power station.
It is a mystery that virtually all the electric car owners believe their power comes magically out of a wall socket at home or a charging station on the road. The power really comes from a nearby power plant all of which burn coal, natural gas or obtain heat from nuclear fuel. Even if the plant gets some energy from local wind turbines or solar photovoltaic cells this amount is minimal. If we really want a huge increase in the number of electric automobiles on the road we must build more fossil fuel burning power plants, not more wind or solar farms.
One hundred years ago life was a constant struggle against disease, pollution, deforestation, treacherous working conditions and enormous cultural divides ……. By the end of the 20th century, the world had become a healthier, safer and more productive place, primarily because of fossil fuels bringing electricity to the homes and workplaces of billions of people around the world.
Isn’t it a little strange that a century ago electrification and its fossil fuel source was revered and now so many despise the source but think they can just keep the electricity. No one told them you can not have your cake and eat it too, or that there are no free lunches.