May 2020

As the whole of mainstream media continues to ridicule claims made by President Trump and his supporters of wholesale electoral fraud in the recent US election (where results in many key states have not yet been certified, indeed votes are still being counted in some of those states,) the chairman of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has come out of the closet for Trump, stating that he believes there is evidence of widespread voter fraud and other alleged electoral irregularities.

In a recent interview, FEC Chairman Trey Trainor said reports of fraud in some battleground states are credible “otherwise they would allow the [poll] observers to go in,” referring to reports of some polling areas refusing to allow GOP observers to check on the process on Election Day and the days after.

“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Nevada, you have the video... they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there or they’re in the process of just marking a ballot that came in blank for a voter. That’s a process that needs to be observed by election observers.”Trainor told Newsmax, Epoch Times reports.

In the interview, he agreed with Trump’s campaign lawsuits, while saying that questionable actions by elections officials in several states could make the election illegitimate. Which makes all those claims by mainstream media that there is no evidence to support Trump's allegation look like a pack of lies.

But there is something else about this election that stinks, several things actually, like the statements from leading Democrats in the weeks before the election about their having a plan to make sure Trump did not win the key states, the way (and this is documented,) that Republican observers were kept from watching the count when US electoral law requires that representatives of all parties are able to observe the process, but is there something in the election system itself that encourages fraud? ”

Yes, two things actually. Dishonesty and corruption; it has been known for decades that the U.S. political system is rotten to the core.. And our old - or should it be new- friend - Artificial Intelligence. Because one of the leading suspects in the fraud is a vote tallying system which is suspected of fliping Trump votes to Biden. And among those who have a financial interest in the company that developed and sells the system are two leading Democrats including the one who announced they had a plan to stop Trump (above) and also bill and Hillary Clinton.

And then there is the question of mail in votes. Postal voting can never be secure, it is an invitation to electoral fraud which is why most countries that have experimented with is quickly abandoned their projects due to problems with vote-fraud (including France, from 1975).

Why do most countries ban mail-in ballots?

Election authorities have concluded the problem with postal voting cannot be fixed.

Why did Britain increase the amount of postal voting, under Tony Blair, when the UK already had a problem with vote-fraud in general, and postal voting in particular? Can the UK have a safe democracy with so many postal votes, when just a tiny number of votes determine the outcome of an election (in 1992 just 1270 votes across eleven constituencies won the Consrevatives a fourth term in government). Perhaps the integrity of UK democracy was not foremost in Tony Blair’s mind.

The UK held their election a year ago. A year before this still-fresh in the memory US election. Boris Johnson's Conservatives won one of the most shambolic elections we have ever had, due mainly to the vast increase in mail in votes. Reports of huge batches of voting papers, all filled in with the same pen and delivered by hand rather than by The Post Office circulated, reports of vote harvesting, particularly among immigrant communities, were rife, boxes full of votes for one candidate were delivered in mystery vans after voting stations had closed, boxes of votes from areas in which the Conservatives or Brexit Party were strong went missing and there were instances of electoral districts in which more votes were cast than there were registered voters to cast them. Any of this sounding familiar?

So while it is justified to ask what the UK can learn from the chaos in the USA, American election authorities should also be asking what could the US have learned from the UK’s farce of an election. On the run up to the election, Dominic Cummings was slipped into Boris Johnson's team as ‘an advisor’ and a sort of digital chief whip who is even less trustworthy than his unpleasant countenance suggests (His Spitting Image puppet depicts him as a Vampire). If this man ever shakes your hand, be sure to count your fingers afterwards.

Cummings was, brought in as an ‘influencer’ to poush through the Brexit deal and votes. His masters were, and are, maths and data. His weapons of choice were -and are- social networks and bots. When he was brought in he made Johnson a promise. Despite Boris looking and sounding increasingly idiotic every time he opened his face, Cummings pledged not only deliver a victory, but to deliver an big majority. And to make such a bold prediction ahead of the game when Corbyn and Labour were doing well it looks even more remarkable. Even to those of us aware of the mood of disillusionment with Labour's metropolital, globalist leadrrship in the party's industrial heartlands, where voters felt "the party of the working class" had abandoned the working class in favour of minorities, globalism and wooing the support of lawyers, academics and the managerial class. It was looking like it would be a close run race until Cummings, with his expertise at using social media, stepped in.

Johnson, Cummings and their party managers all had dirty dealings with Cambridge Analytica. And that company appeared on the radar in 2016 with a similar remit involving the US election. The US and UK are two heads of one body. Ask Iran, Iraq, or Syria. They have the same masters. They share the same goals. They keep each other’s secrets.

Should Cambridge Analytica have used phrases like ”we won” when they are purportedly engaged in social research and have no political identity or party allegiance?

All this does is confirm the suspicion which has finally begun to spread among voters of our great ‘democracies’. That is, that they aren’t democracies at all, elections are a charade, voting is a confidence trick, whoever wins the election, the same people will be pulling strings behind the scenes and the policies implemented will serve the billionaires and global corporations, the banks, lawyers and academics. So what does it mean ? Very likely that those of us who suspect our leaders are chosen for us by the government that we never see or hear of.

If this past 12 months has taught us anything, it’s that no government rules their country or even leads it. They’re like school prefects. They look like they hold power but they’re doing what the school and it’s head master tells them to do. Look at the global covid game. We hear, almost weekly, how much vaccines will cost. How much countries are spending on them. We are told there must be a Great Reset to perpare us for "The New Normal" that we will face after COVID. And yet there is no evidece of the existance of this virus.

In preparation for the "new normal" of global, authoritarian government, countries have been ‘graded’ according to their economies. So in Africa and the undeveloped nations Gates labs will pay less to their vaccine developers working to prepare for the next pandemic than say the UK or France.You can guess who was responsible for the ‘grading’ of course..

But ask yourself what is going on here. A software magnates (actually a patents Magnate - Microsofts success was based on patenting ideas stolen from people who had been happy to put their work in the public domain. ‘Billionaire’ Bil Gates, the man who has never studied economics, politics, or medicine is in charge of all three across the planet right now it seems. Which kind of suggests the world will end up, socially and economically, a big an atrocity as Windows 10.

But no worries, Gate' lack of experience in medicine, finance and economics and the fact that he never wrote a real computer program in his life can be overlooked because he’s a ‘philanthropist’ who ”understands computers and stuff”. And he’s passionate about and ridding the world of diseases and non-billionaires who are- in the words of Gates and his fellow billionaire philanthropists, people such as George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, Jacob Rothschild, Warren Buffet,Jack Dorsey, Michael Bloomberg, ted Turner and Jeff Bezos, and the rest, all of whom seem to get two dollars richer for every dollar they give away - ‘undesirables’.

So, if we’re debating, discussing, arguing or even guessing about the levels of corruption within our world’s great democratic countries, I propose we ask, and then answer for ourselves,then seek the answer the one question that will reveal all you need to know:

Well did you? .................. Now you know why our elections are such a mess these days.

Source: Summit News

Picture: Screenshot from local TV

An NHS nurse in Britain publicly resigned while wearing her uniform before releasing the real numbers of COVID patients in her hospital and denouncing the government’s disastrous lockdown policy.

The whole of England officially entered lockdown 2.0 today despite numerous experts warning that lockdowns will eventually end up killing more people than coronavirus itself.

A video out of Cornwall shows a nurse in uniform giving a speech explaining why she decided to resign from her job.

NHS Nurse Publicly Resigns & Releases The Real Number Of Covid Patients In Her Hospital 'i Can’t Lie Anymore'

“I don’t need the uniform to prove that I work for them, but today, I’m publicly resigning,” she stated.

The nurse then revealed how she received an email from her bosses demanding an explanation as to why she was being critical of official COVID policy and that people were “reporting” her.

“Unfortunately I can’t lie anymore,” said the nurse, explaining how she took a screenshot of internal hospital data showing there were just three people across three hospitals in the region infected with COVID.

The total deaths from these three hospitals across the last 7 months is just 76 people, roughly 10 deaths a month, according to the nurse, who questioned why it was necessary for her region to go into lockdown given such sparse figures.

“I’ve decided there’s no point, I have gone against the rules within the NHS, I have shared confidential information that people need to see,” said the nurse, adding that other doctors and nurses were trying to speak out.

Picture: Albertto Pizzoli, AFP / Getty

The leader of Italy’s Lega party has raged against a double standard whereby Italian citizens are getting “fines and lockdowns” whereas illegal immigrants get “open ports.”

The government of Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte has raised fines to unprecedented levels for those who break the nation’s mask mandate and other new restrictions on personal freedoms, while migrants continue to stream into the country unimpeded on a daily basis, Mr. Salvini complains.

In a Monday morning Facebook post, Salvini notes some 400 migrants arrived from north Africa to the Italian island of Lampedusa on Sunday followed by another three boats with 200 more migrants that landed Monday.

Apparently, the Prime Minister’s health edicts “do not apply” to migrants, Salvini wrote.

The Lega leader has also voiced his opposition to new lockdown measures, insisting that the remedy would be worse than the disease.

“I hope that a new total closure will not be reached because it would be a real economic, social and emotional disaster,” he wrote on Facebook. “Are there any alternatives? Yes, home care because often the remedy risks being worse than the disease.”

In a strange irony, media revealed last Friday that the Tunisian immigrant Brahim Issaoui who stabbed three people to death in the southern French church of Notre Dame while shouting “Allahu akbar” had arrived on the same island of Lampedusa on September 20 before heading north to France where he carried out his attack ... Continue reading >>>

William A Jacobson, Newsweek, 20 October

Last week, social media websites prevented users from sharing a bombshell report from the New York Post outlining how the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden had personally enriched himself by connecting international interests to the Obama administration. The Post had obtained details about Hunter Biden's business dealings with a Ukrainian energy firm, as well as a library of images depicting his controversial lifestyle and substance abuse, from a computer repair center in Delaware.

In subsequent stories, the public learned of additional credible allegations about Hunter Biden, including that he used his family connections to arrange meetings for Chinese Communist Party officials and business associates with the Obama administration, which his father, then the vice president, attended. All of these demonstrate the very real benefit Hunter Biden, and possibly his father, derived from the political access he enjoyed. As the country approaches election day, such corruption is important for the American voter to consider, especially as Joe Biden pursues the presidency.

Unfortunately, the mainstream media don't seem to agree. Following the publication of the New York Post story, they worked overtime to insist that it could be Russian disinformation for the purposes of election meddling ...Continue reading >>>

by JuraCalling
Oct 20, 2020 8:50 PM

On the 5th of October, the WHO’s Dr Michale Ryan claimed “about 10%” of the global population had been infected with Sars-Cov-2. With an alleged death toll of roughly 1 million, that puts the infection-fatality ratio at roughly 0.14%. The maths is not disputable. And yet Facebook has flagged it as “misinformation”.

The Facebook claim is based on an article by Health Feedback, an “independent” fact-checker, which is shoddy, inaccurate and dishonest.

They ignore all the most recent IFR studies. Literally dozens of studies have been done on the IFR of Sars-Cov-2 to this point, many of them published and peer-reviewed in just the last few weeks. The average IFR in these studies has been much lower than 0.68% (usually between 0.1 and 0.2).

The “recent studies” healthfeedback cite are from June at the latest. They also never mention the immunological studies which suggest up to 80% of people may already have mucosal or cellular-based immunity, potentially dropping the IFR even further.

These factcheckers don’t even know how averages work. Health Feedback claim: "the 0.14% IFR estimate fails to account for the extensive IFR variability between populations due to a different distribution of risk factors such as age, ethnicity, access to healthcare, and underlying health conditions in each population."

This is is total nonsense. Of course the IFR accounts for those differences. Some people are more at risk from Covid than others, some people are at almost no risk. The IFR takes those differences into account, and produces an average overall chance of death. That’s how averages work.

This is why I recently suggested that arguing over the finer points of data analysis and any numbers crunched was an exercise in futility. It’s an argument that can’t be won as the figures, the projections and the data have all been false from the beginning because the agenda was to scare the public into handing over their rights in exchange for a rescue package that isn’t really needed. And, of course, we know that much of the data was extracted from hospitals, dishonest doctors and seats of learning who provided the graphs and numbers in exchange for money and immunity from prosecution.Only exposing the truth ( if working within the medical community) is costly. Not only do you receive no blood money, you stop receiving salary and become ostracised by peers ( who are still accepting ‘donations’ to keep up the narrative).

These fact checkers are having to work far too hard to deconstruct a narrative by unpicking numbers.Far too hard. A lie is a lie and a truth is a truth. This is a torturous maths lesson in the name of desperation.And, if they’re so desperate to promote this truth that big money is changing hands, then you can use common sense to work out why.

The conversations should be about incidents that have happened, lies that have been witnessed by the public. Lies either printed in papers available to the public, spoken in public or exposed in public. A little like the Neal Ferguson lies of over a decade ago and repeated 9 months ago for a new narrative. What say you, Fact checkers. Where is that creature now ? He needs to be put on trial. Or has Uncle Bill been greasing the wheels again….

Facebook. A beacon of transparency and entertainment with a CEO who used to be a body double for several Muppet characters and kept Kermit’s voice and intellect.

This is the power of branding . A recognisable brand can say so much. Had the CIA put one of their middle aged psychopaths front and centre to sell Facebook on behalf of their Nazi paymasters, too many people would have perceived the aroma of a rodent.

But had they realised back then that the same CIA had been beavering away on a huge and expensive project to collect the data of as many people on the planet as possible( covertly of course) they may have caught that aroma anyway. . It was called Lifelog. It was abandoned on Feb 4th 2004. Facebook was launched that day. Check it- fact checkers. Then explain the last decades growing mountain of evidence that it’s still stealing people’s privacy and selling it on.Coincidence? Ain’t that a fact..

But the masses saw this innocent dope student who was sold as ‘cool’ because he’d dropped out and invented Facebook ‘for you guys’ to share and meet and make invisible friends.For his trouble he was made a very dull billionaire. He’s had more handlers than Madonna’s knickers.

Google have also joined the party.They refused to remove the ‘youtube’ brand because people love youtube. So it paid to keep the recognisable brand rather than call it CIA tube.

The Nazi’s did it in 45. They realised they had many brand semiotics burned into the global psyche ; all the uniforms and flags and marches.You see those you think Eugenics, Genocide, and world domination. They were a very naughty lot.

In 1945 the Americans rescued them( thanks America) as we all watched the lesser ones hang( check that fact, fact checkers). Their new ‘brand’ is a star spangled banner. They merely write the plans and do the work now .The user-friendly WW2 heroes carry out their plan .A brand you can trust.They kept the Eagle.Business as usual..

Here’s a fact i find relevant to the current obsession with trying to destroy the truth. It involves that other brand people trust – the WHO. The World Health Organisation is really the World Genocide Programme.But that, despite being quite catchy, might have raised an eyebrow or two.So we play along, despite the ‘fact’ that the blood in the veins of this beast is the Gates river of dollars.The very same Gates who wants to murder most of the population so they can grow more daffodils.

Back in the 1970s, the game moved up a few gears. The crazy bastards like Gallo et al were getting a bit too busy with their breeding of old and new viruses and mixing and matching.It was all covert( as regard to the public being aware).But the Governments knew.After all, they enjoyed tens of thousands dying. And if they could do it with out making a racket and breaking things, all the more fun.

In 1972 The World Health Organization (W.H.O.) published a proposal:

“An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function, e.g., by …affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens.”

This is a clinical description of the function of the AIDS virus.

There’s a fact to check, Fact checkers.

The incidence of AIDS infections in Africa coincides exactly with the locations of the W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program in the mid-1970’s (London Times, May 11, 1987). Some 1The 4,000 Haitians then on UN secondment to Central Africa were also vaccinated in this campaign.
Knock yourself out, fact checkers.

1975

The virus section of Fort Detrick’s Center for Biological Warfare Research is renamed the Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities and placed under the supervision of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Branding again.Ever see the word ‘cure’ in Cancer Research literature or advertising campaigns before you made a donation? me neither…
Keep your eyes open. The stake are high in this game now.And you can’t get back any time you waste.

Billionaire software tycoon Bill Gates has urged the US to prepare for a Covid-19 vaccine rollout by deputizing trusted community leaders to “reduce vaccine hesitancy,” bemoaning the rapid spread of “conspiracy theories” online.

The Microsoft founder-turned-vaccine-evangelist painted a mostly rosy picture of a vaccine rollout getting “rich countries” back to normal by the end of 2021 in an interview during the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council on Tuesday.

However, with less than half of Americans saying they’d get a Covid jab – even if paid $100 for it – in a recent survey, Gates then focused his talk on enlisting the nation’s “trust network” to overcome the skeptics.

As usual the arrogance of Bill Gates prevents him from understanding that as one of the main advocates (and likely benificiaries) of a COVID vaccine, his well documented support for policies like eugenics and population reduction might be a factor in fuelling peole's resistance to a Coronavirus vaccine.We only have to ask people in India, various parts of Africa and other places that have had the dubious benefit of Gates Foundation mass vaccination projects what they thing of Mr. Gates' "philantropy" to understand why so many people are wary of any vaccine this man has anything to do with.

Gates has previously warned that the “final hurdle” to a vaccine-fuelled return to normalcy is convincing the population to actually roll up their sleeves and take the jab(s), and the World Health Organization – of which his foundation is the single largest funder, following the US’ departure – declared “vaccine hesitancy” one of the biggest threats to world health last year. The billionaire has stated he hopes to have seven billion humans vaccinated with whatever formula proves safe and effective, but has suggested a mandate would be counterproductive and actually increase resistance to vaccines.

Lamenting that “vaccine hesitancy is in all countries and predates the pandemic,” Gates suggested American health officials start “thinking about which voices will help reduce the hesitancy, so we can get a level of vaccination that really has a chance of stopping” the virus.

Gates provided the example of challenges the polio vaccine faced in some countries – and the cunning lengths some were willing to go to get their populations jabbed.

The original plan of having a COVID vaccine made mandatory, with those who brefuse it prevented from working, travelling or sending their children to schoool has already been symied which explains why the billionaire has softened his usual authoritarian stance.

The Human Rights Court recently confirmed that Article 8 protects our physical, moral and psychological integrity, as well as our right to choose. Failing to respect someone's competent refusal of medical treatment, and providing treatment against their will, is therefore protected against by Article 8.

It is not clear why a software peddler, and a peddler of shoddy, not-fit-for-purpose software at that, has become the go-to person on global medical issues.All the companies working on this miracle vaccine for a bad cold have already won the NO liability clause from the governments that go along with the hoax. So if you end up a veggie or die or ill . Oh well too bad for you. Just like gates software . If you run it and something happens to the OS that cause monetary damage to you or your company Microsoft is not liable. All computer software has that little gift from TPTB

What motivated the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic at the time they did? How much of the pandemonium, governments’ lock downs and corporate control is an overreaction? How much of it was planned? Whose agendas do these lock downs and economic controls ultimately serve? Did you know that covid-19 testing kits were distributed before the pandemic was declared?

A group of 600 medical doctors gathered in Spain and called the covid-19 outbreak “a false pandemic” created for political purposes. Locking people down and convincing them they can spread infections they do not have is a tyrannical curse of oppression. These doctors urge other healthcare professionals, “the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.” Why are human rights being challenged during a time of human need?

In September 2019, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled, ‘A World at Risk’ which detailed how the UN and WHO conduct system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a “lethal respiratory pathogen.” Why did Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates go on record about an impending pandemic, long before one was declared? Why are both these men so adamant about vaccinating the world population?

Continue reading >>>