How World Economic Forum Infiltrates Governments To Put Its Members As Leaders

from Great Game India February 22

Maajid Nawaz, a British activist and radio broadcaster, seemed to startle Joe Rogan, a mega-star podcaster, as he outlined how Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF) is penetrating world governments to put its own members as leaders to establish a global “checkpoint society” in a Saturday discussion.

Nawaz, the founding head of Quilliam, a think tank dedicated to combating Islamist extremism, told Rogan in a three-hour interview broadcast Saturday that the WEF has planted its members in national leadership positions around the world to pursue the organization’s vast authoritarian goal.

Nawaz said the WEF has worked on “embedding people in government who are subscribed to” the Great Reset agenda, attempting to explain that government leaders around the world have started pulling COVID-19 mandates and constraints while keeping in place an apparatus of digital tracking and identification that shapes the embryonic phases of a digital social credit rating.

“That’s what they say,” Nawaz added, pointing out that the World Economic Forum’s webpage explains the so-called Great Reset, whose proponents have notoriously claimed that by 2030, humans will “own nothing and be happy.”

Schwab explicitly claimed that the COVID-19 reaction must be used to “revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions” in a 2020 book named “Covid-19: The Great Reset.”  .,.. Continue reading >>>

 
[Daily Stirrer] ... [ Our Page on on Substack ]... [Boggart Aboad] ... [ Greenteeth Home ] ... [ Greenteeth on Minds.com ] ... [ Latest Posts ]

---

Goodbye Freedom, Hello Global Governance

If at any time during the chaos the past eighteen months you have wondered what kind of idiots are running the world and have gleefully trashed economies, disrupted social and commercial life and stripped citizens of their rights and liberties only to bring us, in late October 2021, right back to where we were in late February 2020 when the words pandemic and COVID crept into our consciousness. Yet here was are, talking once more about lockdowns, mask mandates and mass vaccination programs, (of the booster shot this time, because as those of us who understand what immunise means predicted,  the much hyped and hugely expensive vaccines don't work. Or as I have written before, they actually work perfectly and are doing what they were designed to do, which is not what we were told the vaccines were being administered for.

The long running pandemic, the storyline of which is now so ludicrously convoluted I feel almost justified in referring to it as a soap opera, has been brought to you not by The People's Republic Of China, nor the scientists of China's Wuhan Biological Weapons \research Laboratory, nor was it produced and directed by the governments of the USA, UK, , European Union member states and other G20 nations, 

You may not have heard of the Global Public-Private Partnership (GPPP) but this world-wide network of stakeholders and their proxies as the paternersip was only formalised by an agreement of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations in 2019. 

 "Hang on on, wasn't that warmongering, billionaire worshipping, warthog felching gobshite Blair always going on about stakeholders?" you might well ask. Yes he was and surprise, surprise, Blair, the uberr - globalist of British politics had close links with the GPPP, or at least the people at the centre of that informal, unaccountable network of billionaires, bureaucrats, lawyers, academics and general cunts. But back to business ...

Little has been written or reported by mainstream media about GPPP since that agreement was made, which somehow is not surprising even though it affects the life and future of every man, woman and child on the planet. The formal creation of the GPPP, which had actually been around for years even though few people knew of it, signalled a shift in how the ruling elites view our world, not as being made up of ethnically and culturally diverse, self governing nations but as economic units under the contrl of a centralised bureaucracy. Obviously this goes against everything we have been told about the direction in which our nations were moving. 

Had such information been widely available there would have been mayhem, so it had to be kept in the background while propagandists, aware that fear is the most potent weapon for those who want to control the minds of large groups of people. So while mainstream media pumped up fear levels in the population by hyping stories of impending catastrophic climate change, pandemics of killer viruses and economic collapse. Thus while an insidious campaign to undermine confidence in democracy unfolded the driving forces behind it were covered up. This explains why you are not likely to have heard of GPPP.

However, you may recently have hears of Klaus Schwab, the 83 year old  president of the WEF as he has been talking a lot about The Great Reset and The New Normal. German national Schwab, the scion of afamily prominent in the Nazi party, who physically is a cartoonish figure has gleefully told us many times that we can never go back to the way things were before the hoax pandemic and that we must be willing to surrender our freedoms if we want The Master Race to take the burden of responsibility from us and micro - manage our lives "from the cradle to the grave," as the saying goes.

The GPPP network of stakeholders  (the financial cartel, their partners and the paid help hired from the government / private sector) is made up chiefly of global corporations (including central banks), the kind of philanthropic foundations that focus their philanthropy on making multi-billionaire philanthropists even richer, the kind of bureaucrats and academics who hold lucrative sinecures on policy think-tanks, governments and their overt, covert and subterranean agencies), non-governmental organisations (often indistinguishable from the philanthropic foundations and funded by the same people,),selected academic & scientific institutions, global charities, the labour unions and other chosen “thought leaders.”

The GPPP controls global finance via the Bank for International Settlements , (aka BIS or the Bankers banker,) and the world’s economy through the rigged markets the global banks control. Because it controls money and therefore trade, the GPPP also steers world, national and local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those policies using the mainstream media (MSM) corporations who are also “partners” within the GPPP. Often those policies are devised by the think-tanks and unquestioningly adopted by governments, also GPPP partners. Government in the developed world is no loger the result of democratic process, but over the past few decades has been transformed into global governance with our elected representatives no longer making law or formulating policy but instead performing a middle management role by merely implementing the policies handed down from above.

Under the tradional Westphalian system of national sovereignty, which served well since the 17th century the government of one nation cannot impose legislation or law in another. The European Union (EU,) a Globalist pilot project consigned that international understanding to the wastebin of history when they, with the complicity of national leaders like the aforementioned Blair, and without consultation or debate with the voters of member states, created a system by which it was recognised that EU law superseded all national laws. As we have seen in the COVID epidemic that system now applies globally as vaccine mandates and health passports (based on the Chinese system of Social Credits,) are being adopted by nation aftr nation though not, we are happy to report, without massive public resistance.

 Another observable trait of GPPP global governance is that it is enacted through proxies, usually agencies of, or linked to The United Nations. In the case of the COVID hoax pandemic this has been the World Health Organisation (WHO), in the case of the 2008 financial crisis it was the International Monetary Fund, (IMF) and the Global Warming / Climate Change chimera the International Panel on  IPCC, (International Panel on Climate Change,)

Since its inception The GPPP has usually been involved in influencing policy in the field of public health and specifically in a number of United Nation’s (UN) documents, including the notorious Agenda 30 and those put forward by agencies such as the WHO.

In their 2005 document Connecting For Health, which was not widely distributed and completely blanked by mainstream media in spite of its significance for every human being on ple planet, the WHO set out what the Millennium Development Goals of the GPPP meant for global health, revealed the emerging GPPP (emphasis ours):

These changes occurred in a world of revised expectations about the role of government: that the public sector has neither the financial nor the institutional resources to meet their challenges, and that a mix of public and private resources is required……Building a global culture of security and cooperation is vital….The beginnings of a global health infrastructure are already in place. Information and communication technologies have opened opportunities for change in health, with or without policy-makers leading the way…….Governments can create an enabling environment, and invest in equity, access and innovation.”

The revised role of governments referred to in that paragraph signalled the demotion of our democratically elected national assemblies to mere managers, no longer leading but instead administering the policies of the real, but invisible leaders. 

In January 2019 I wrote these paragraphs on one of the discussion topics at that year's WEF jamboree:

One of the keynote topics the WEF will blether about this year is mental health. The forum will address fears that depression,and other mental health problems are rising to excessive levels. To put that another way the globalists are probably considering whether they can get away with telling us: “If you don’t follow the groupthink, you must have ‘mental health issues’ and be sent away for reprogramming, sorry, ‘treatment’”

The APA (American Psychological Association) which will be represented at Davos, has already pronounced that ‘traditional masculinity’ is a mental health issue. That position is going to be taught in every psychology degree program across the United States, starting NOW !

Think on what has been happening since then. Do you remember al the screeching and whining about toxic masculinity, a storm in a beer glass over the notion that any example of men behaving like men. According to those who are to cowardly to lead from the front and arrogant enough to believe they can direct the course of events while cowering behind the barricades, the vague and undefinable state labelled 'traditional masculinity' is a mental illness. So what signs might indicate a man is mad? Carrying out home improvements, maintaining car and motorbike engines,  cutting down trees? Toxic masculinity was a propaganda psy - op of course, part of a long term divide-and-rule plan that has over several decades served to divide the societies if the developed world along multiple fault lines, male versus female, black versus white, Muslim versus Christian, religion versus secularism, and those are just the main ones.

Some analysts have suggested the GPPP grew out of the dissatisfaction among bankers and global corporations with the UN, originally conceived in the wake of World War 2 as a potential global government but progressive enmired in east versus west, communist versus capitalist, Islamic vesus everything and science versus nature conflicts.  Amid all this a realisation emerged that Benito Mussolini, the Italian fascist leader, had been on to something when he said that the way forward lay in collaboratio between corporate business and the corporate state. The perception that  global corporations, and particularly the corporations that make up the Big Pharma cartel, were the key to policy implementation. The drug companies were ideally placed to exploit a propaganda campaing to generate fear in populations, through the threat of a killer virus that had the potential to wipe out humanity. Once the majority of the population had been whipped into a frenzy of fear and panic it would be easy to convince them only global government could save the world (from a threat that never really existed except in the sensationalist rhetoric and fake statistics of propagandists.)

And if the scam could succeed once it could be repeated again and again.

But the push for globalism and a global, technocratic, authoritarian government of appointed bureaucrats, academics, scientists and politicians started long before COVID became a thing.

Do a little research and it is easy to see how GPPP’s terms of reference were designed to facilitate the participation of new breed of corporations. These entities appeared to have recognised the folly of their previously destructive business practices. They were ready to own their mistakes and make amends. They gave the impression this would be achieved by partnering with government to solve global problems and consequently gained influence over vast areas of government policy. The existential threats were of course defined by the GPPP and the selected scientists, academics and economists they funded, and the responses "led by science".

In 1998 the former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan delivered a speech to the keyWorld Economic Forum (WEF) at its annual beano in Davos, the luxury resort in Switzerland where the rich and powerful and their selected political and bureaucratic rubbing rags meet to decide what the future holds for you, me and the other 99.9999999999% of humanity. It was a speech recognised as marking the transition from the Westphalian sovereignty model  to a GPPP based global governance system.

Annan said:

The United Nations has been transformed since we last met here in Davos. The Organization has undergo a complete overhaul that I have described as a ‘quiet revolution’…A fundamental shift has occurred. The United Nations once dealt only with governments. By now we know that peace and prosperity cannot be achieved without partnerships involving governments, international organizations, the business community and civil society…The business of the United Nations involves the businesses of the world.”

Freed from the shackles of bureaucratic double, triple and everyple up to twentythousandple speak all that means is, "Forget democracy boys and girls, we the self - appointed global elite are running things now." It is easy to see why the GPPP was such an enticing prospect for global banking, oil, industrianl and pharmaceutical interests. But to clarify, Annan added:

Shifting ideologies and trends in globalization have highlighted the need for closer global governance, an issue for both private and public sectors. We suggest that at least some of the support for GPPPs stems from this recognition, and a desire on the part of the private sector to be part of global regulatory decision-making processes.”

In the flawed democratic systems of government we had lived under there was at least a pretence that our elected representatives served the people who elected them and the wider national constituency. Now, according to the words of Kofi Annan's speech We The People were simply expected to accept, without question, that global corporations are benign and humanitarian organisations that care nothing for profit and are totally committed to saving the planet, alleviating poverty, hunger and disease and persuading us all to be kind to small furry animals. Supposedly, a GPPP led system of global governance is somehow beneficial for us and all we are required to do in order to earn these benefits is surrender our freedom..

The people involved in this wannabe World Domination Society are so detached from reality they seem to seriously believe that voters will fall for this. Many of the stakeholder corporations have been convicted, or publicly held accountable, for the crimes they have commited. These include war crimes. The apparent passive agreement of our elected leaders that these “partners” should effectively set global policy, regulations and spending priorities seems delusional to say the least.

 In reality however corporate influence over the political system had been increasing for generations. In UK and USA and probably in other countries I am not so familiar with there now appears to be a two way travelator so that executives can move easily between government and private sector jobs. There have even been cases of people holding a position in government while working in a part time capacity for a corporate business. The phrase "Conflict Of Interest seems to have lost all meaning. Elected politicians have long-been the junior partners in this merger between government and capital.

The arrival of GPPP heralded the birth of a process to formalise this relationship, the creation of a cohesive New  World Order, or as Klaus Schwab, President of the WEF, model for several Bond villains and Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers franchise, but necer elected to anything by popular vote predicted recently, "By 2035 you will own nothing and be happy." The politicians have simply stuck to the script ever since that Kofi Anna speech in 1998, and people who saw through the bullshit were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. But one by one, like dominoes falling, the "conspiracy theories" about a hijack of democracy and personal liberty and the imposition of global governance turned out to be true.

MORE ON GLOBALISATION AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

 

The WEF Brave New World: In 2030 You Will Own Nothing And Have No Privacy

No, that headline is not a joke, according to Klaus Schwab, godfather of "The Great Reset," president of The World Economic Forum (WEF), a group of wealthy business people and bureaucrats which meets in Davos, Switzerland every January, ten years from now ownership will have been be abolished, you will rent everything you need on a short term basis, except for basic needs like food, clothing and a roof over your head, all of which will be allocated by government officials. Furthermore every detail of every minute of your life, your conversations, your intimacies, your farts even, will be monitored by cameras, microphones and electronic tracking devices. And, Schwab insists, you will be happy. Relieved of responsibility for themselves the working class and middle class people of the world will be happy, Schwab insists. Sounds like he's planning to make you happy by force.

The scenario is scarily reminiscent of some of the 20th century's most disturbing works of dystopian fiction. Take this quotation as an example of what the ruling elites have in mind for us.

"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude." ? Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

Or this one from George Orwell

"Freedom is slavery" (George Orwell, 1984)

Founded half a century ago with an agenda based on the ideological foundation of Cultural Marxism, which proposed an authoritarian, technocratic world government the WEF has steadily gained suport, particularly over recent decades, the WEF provides a forum for political and business leaders along with selected academicswho have gained considerable influence in their fields. The item that dominates the agenda at each annual jamboree in Davos (where anyone can attend so long as they have $250,000 to spare for a ticket,) is globalisation and the transfer of power from national governments, and eventually from individuals, towards a central authority. Free markets, democratic government and individual sovereignty will not figure in his brave new world, instead micromanaged societies, government interventionism and planned economic and social activities will be the norm. Individual liberty and private property do not figure in the plans at all.

In November 2016 the WEF published a paper, “8 Predictions for the World in 2030.” This proposed radical changes to the way people work and live, and as I am 72 now I and others of a similar age will probably be clssified as useless eaters (a phrase borrowed from the Nazis, but it's not the only thing from Hitler's unpleasant regime the WEF has taken on board . This agenda is not just a wish list compiled by a few ultra rich control freaks, it is a plan that a year ago may have seemed fanciful but after the pandemic and the consequent assault on individual freedom, the lockdowns, social distancing, mandatory mask wearing, suddenly looks much more feasible. According to projections contained in the WEF’s “Global Future Councils,” private property will be abolished during the next decade and surveillance will be total and constant, even in our homes. And woe betide anyone who puts so much as a toenail out of line.

The WEF document does not try to sugar the pill, homes that people have bought will be confiscated without compensation, as will savings and valuables. The central government will give you an income adequate for your "needs" which will be determined by your status in society. The WEF projection says that consumer goods, too, would be no longer private property which is even more extreme than the communist regimes of The Soviet Union, China and their satellite states, which at least allowed for a few private posessions. In the WEF socialist utopia the state would be sole proprietor of all goods.

Availability of goods for temporary use would be rationed in line with a social credit system.

The “sustainable agriculture,” policies in WEF documents show how total the world government's control of our lives will be. Our diet, as mandated, would be mainly vegetarian, except - though this is not explicitly stated - for members of the tiny ruling elite, the sociopathic billionaires club we may as well call them, you can bet they will be eating whatever they want to eat, served of course by people forced to subsist on a couple of bowls of porridge or lentil soup a day.

As soon as we hear or read the word sustainable we understand that the climate change hoax is being invoked to justify stripping us of our freedom and condemning us to lives as humandroids in this Brave New World. In a contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken pains a picture of this "sustainable future: “If we win the war on climate change.” By 2030, when CO₂ emissions will be greatly reduced, people will live in a world where meat on the dinner plate “will be a rare sight” (as it was and is in Soviet Russia, Communist China and Castro's Cuba. I recall an interview the late Clive James did with Cuban born singer Gloria Estefan. James, whose political sympathies did not lie on the right of the spectrum asked Gloria why she had quit Cuba and lived in a mansion in Florida. She replied: "I can sing with the Buena vista Social Club and eat meat twice a month or I can live here, tour America and Europe and eat what I choose when I choose."

Beyond Privacy and Property

How can people be persuaded or coerced to accept such a system? you might well ask. It appears the globalist elite are using a carrot and stick approach similar to but more sophisticated than that favoured by the medieval church. The stick element is fear, predictions of impending climate catastrophe have been thrown at us for twenty five years and are now being met with such levels of scepticism among the general population that even a bid to bring us to heel by using a physically immature, retarded Swedish teenager (Little Miss Thunberg is afflicted with foetal alcohol syndrome which explains her physical immaturity, unusual facial features and learning difficulties) to tug at our heartstrings as she complained that global wartming was stealing out future. She is being used of course, the girl cannot answer the simplest question on climate without an autocue to read from. The terminally gullible fell for it of course, they always do, but there were always enough well informed sceptics, who as our critics are quick to point out, are not climate scientists, to challenge the propaganda narrative that we were all going to die if we did not surrender our rights, civil liberties and free will to the globalist elite. One does not have to be a "climate scientist" to spot the flaws in the Anthropgenic Global Warming hypothesis just as one does not have to be an automotive engineer to strip down and rebuild a car engine or a computer scientists to build and program a data broadcast unit ( know, I've done all three.) So the Grwat Reset / New World Order / Scientific Dictatorship had to be put on hold until a better scare could be found.

The carrot employed to entice the masses is the assurance of comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed basic income, free housing and free entertainment. The promoters of the Great Reset promise a world without diseases. Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments, a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality will be possible the punters are told. Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality. The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life. What a pity the scientists are not making much progress on arresting the ageing process.

Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike superman, the promise of a “universal basic income” is highly attractive, particularly if the accompanying policy of centralised management of labour is not mentioned. Yes, the global government will expect us to work for our basic income, in fact they will not just expect it, those of working age will be allocated to jobs and forced to work, at soul destroying menial tasks if they are not qualified to find a job in the new hi - tech industries or the digital economy. Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as a bait to get the support that demographic who have made a career out of avoiding gainful employment.

To make it economically viable, the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of wage differences. The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote the cashless society. With the digitization of all monetary transactions, each individual purchase will be registered. As a consequence, the governmental authorities would have unrestricted access to supervise in detail how individual persons spend their money. A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to penalise undesirable behavior and to identify and eliminate the superfluous and unwanted. These restraints will not apply to the elite of course, for the rest of us absolute conformity will be the only way to avoid coming to the attention of what Orwell dubbed "The Thought Police".

Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken, who had served as her country’s minister of the environment from 2011 to 2014 is still a member of the Danish Parliament and is one of the WEEF's political advisers, has published a paper, “Welcome to 2030,” in which describes the world WEF leaders want to deliver us into.

“I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better," she writes. Shopping and owning things have become obsolete, because everything that once was a product is now a service. People have free access to transportation, accommodation, food, “and all the things we need in our daily lives.” 

Auken, showing a lack of self awareness entirely typical of the far left world domination cult, continues by spelling,  for people who are foolishly obsessed with ideas of the importance of personal liberty and choice just how diabolocally insane the WEF plans are. As things become free of charge she explains, “it does not make sense for us to own much.” There would be no private ownership or exclusive tenancy of houses, “because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.” A person’s living room, for example, will be used for business meetings when one is absent. Concerns like “lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment” will become things of the past. The author predicts that people will be happy to enjoy such a good life that is so much better “than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.”

A good life? Without liberty or choice? Without risk or challenges? That is no life, it is the existence of a slave, and what's more a slave of the most miserable, joyless and inhuman master imaginable. In the words of GK Chesterton:

They have given us into the hand of new unhappy lords,
Lords without anger or honour, who dare not carry their swords.
They fight by shuffling papers; they have bright dead alien eyes;
They look at our labour and laughter as a tired man looks at flies.
And the load of their loveless pity is worse than the ancient wrongs,
Their doors are shut in the evening; and they know no songs.
from The Secret People by G K Chesterton

How can people be persuaded to surrender liberty and free will and accept such a dehumanising system? The bait to entice the masses is in that promise of free comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed basic income. They are trying to manipulate people with fear: what do workers in an industrial society fear most (except perhaps for war?) Unemployment and ill health.

The Great Reset can and will solve unemployment, you will simply be told what work you are assigned to. As for ill health, well I don;t see any great difference in the incidence of cancer or heart disease in socialist countries. A friend of mine who is s socialist likes to tell me that Cuba has the best free public health service in the world. It does, but serving a population of 11.2 million, the Cubal heath system treats more cases of malnutrition that thoise of the UK, France and Germany combined (respective populations 67 million, 68 million, and 85 million.

The promoters of the Great Reset promise a world without diseases. Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments, a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality are said to be possible. Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality. The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life. Well if there's an overpopulation problem now, everybody living forever is really going to help a few generations down the line. The stuff they are talking about is science fiction, these misanthropic creeps are so addled by their addiction to power they have divorced themselves from reality.

Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike immortal superman, the promise of a “universal basic income” is highly attractive, particularly to those who will no longer find a job in the new digital economy. Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as a bait to get the support of the poor. However to make it economically viable, the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of earnings. The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote the cashless society. With the digitization of all monetary transactions, each individual purchase will be registered. As a consequence, the governmental authorities would have unrestricted access to supervise in detail how individual persons spend their money. A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to sanction undesirable behavior and identify the superfluous and unwanted.

Who Will Be the Rulers?

Silly question really. The World Economic Forum is silent about who will rule in this new world order, which of itself should make any intelligent person deeply suspicious. Their protestations of good intent bring to mind the words of author C S Lewis:

There is no reason to expect that the new power holders would be benevolent or that the utopian promises would be kept. Yet even if the top decision-makers of the new world government did not quickly become the brutal despots their socialist predecessors have become, but but simply technocrats obesssed with planning and control, what reason would an administrative technocracy have to keep feeding and caring for the people Hillary Clinton oce called deplorabless? What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman? Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence, advanced medicine and the wonders of technology with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few?

Not being swayed away by the utopian promises, a sober assessment of the plans must come to the conclusion that in this Brave New World, there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away along with the “unemployable,” “feeble minded,” and “ill bred," the useless eaters as Adolf Hitler called them Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister prospect of eugenics, now euphemistically referred to as “genetic engineering,” and “transhumanism,” a term  coined by Julian Huxley, the first director of the UNESCO. Google are great corporate champions of transhumanism and even have a project experimenting with directly interfacing a microprocessor with the human brain so we can all be permanently hooked up to Google data centres and receive "suggestions" from its Artificial Intelligence algorithms.

The promoters of the Great Reset project keep silent about who will be the rulers in thrir new world. The dystopian and collectivist nature of these plans is the result of the rejection of capitalism, the abolition of freedom and the destruction of wetern civilisation.. Creating a better world through a global dictatorship is a contradiction in terms. The Green New Deal is just another power grab based on the manipulative properties of fear. The world is getting greener now and a fall in the growth rate of the world population is already underway.

The World Economic Forum in concert with a cabal of global corporations, a few of governments and the misanthropic social media billionaires of Silicon Valley want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy. Values like individualism, personal sovereignty and freedom of spech and information are at stake. Should we abandon these in favor of what George Orwell called  oligarchic  collectivism and the imposition of a “common good” that is defined by the self-proclaimed elite of technocrats. What is sold to the public as the promise of equality and ecological sustainability is in fact an assault on free will and human rights.

WEF Davos 2020: Trump slams climate 'prophets of doom'

Climate protestors at Davos (Picture: Getty via Deutsche Welle) Although climae change was the top issue issue on the agenda at this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the so called 'world No. 1 climate change denier, U.S. President Donald Trump was one of the main speakers. He and the darling of Social Justice Warriors, Swedish munchkin Greta Thunberg laid out competing visions for the future of the planet: Trump spoke of economic progress through technology which, he claimed, would also address the environmental problems leftist eco - warriors complain of. Thunberg extolled the hippy - dippy dream of abandoning civilisation and returning to to a planet friendly, hunter - gatherer lifestyle without mentioning that to fulfill her dream of a carbon - free world would mean millennials giving up their iPhones, plasma screen TVs, electric cars and other little politically correct luxuries. But little Greta has always been big on making demands about what people should be compelled to do but somewhat lacking when it comes to offering practical solutions. Trump dismissed the concerns of environmental activists as "pessimism," and said the world must ignore prophets of doom, in an impressive speech made political and business leaders at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, but his words were chosen with the US domestic audience very much in mind. Climate change and global warming are topping the agenda at this year's annual meeting in the Swiss ski resort of Davos, with activists at odds with businesses and governments about how to tackle the issue. We can only conclude from the importance attached to climate change that the global banking cartel have developed a way to make money out of it. Here are a main points of Trump's speech: The US leader dubbed climate activists "prophets of doom" and rejected their warnings of climate related humanitarian catastrophe, saying: "Fear and doubt is not a good thought process." Despite the concerns expressed by the environment lobby about Carbon Dioxide emissions emissions, Trump trumpeted the success of the USA as one of the world's largest producers of natural gas. He announced that the US would be joining the WEF's 1 trillion trees initiative. When asked about his stance on climate change by reporters ahead of his speech, he said: "I'm a big believer in the environment. The environment is very important to me." Much of Trump's speech was focused on praising his administration's domestic economic successes including job creation, a resurgence of manufacturing and cutting through bureaucracy and saying that by rolling back regulations, prosperity "would come thundering back at record speed." "A nation's highest duty is to its own citizens," he said. "Only when governments put their citizens first, will they be invested in their national futures." Following Trump's speech, Swedish teen climate activist Greta Thunberg, recently exposed as a front for much older though no less immature far left activists when it was revealed her father is responsible for authoring her online articles and public speeces her online activities, writing and posting items in her name. Greta predictably criticized world leaders and business executives for failing to meet their climate obligations. She also complained that her previous demands for action to drastically reduce Carbon Dioxide emissions had been ignored. As in all her speeches and articles, her lack of economic awareness or understanding of how the global economy works are glaringly obvious. She appears to believe CO2 emissions can be reduced simply by flicking a switch and completely fails to acknowledge that to achierve the things she want done overnight would actually take decades, cost millions of industrial jobs in the developed nations and trash the economies of those nations. Critics have also been pointing out that she addresses all her remarks to western leaders and consumers and makes no criticism of the world's biggest poluter, China, or other rapidly growing economies such as India, Indonesia, Brazil and Nigeria. Ah well, I guess on planet Hippy - Dippy third world nations and people are above citicism. Trouble is, whenever the demands of Greta and her supporters are met by the developed world, targets are only achieved by transferring the dirty processes to economies the eco warriors will not complain about for fear of being called racist. What makes me so sure the whole Thinberg phenomenon is a carefully managed Public Relations campaign is that nobody is asking: "Hey kid, you haven't even reached school leaving age yet, you are certainly not old enough to vote, who the fuck elected you to speak for the people of the world?" Addressing the audience of business leaders Thunberg said, as she has many times before "Unlike you, my generation will not give up without a fight. The facts are clear but they are still too uncomfortable for you to address." "Our house is still on fire. Your inaction is fueling the flames by the hour. And we are telling you to act as if you loved your children above all else," Thunberg said, repeating comments from her WEF appearance last year. At a panel just before Trump arrived, Thunberg emphasized that moderate changes will not be enough to slow the impact of climate change. So if she gets her way, millions will starve and billions will be plunged into poverty as the industrial economies are shut down in order to achieve zero Carbon Dioxide emissions. RELATED POSTS: ****end****