the daily stirrer

Transhumanism - Elitist and Mad Scientist Collaboration To Tuurn Us Into Automatons.

One of the problems The Daily Stirrer, many of our reders and millions of people all around the world have with modern science is that it's exponents recognise no ethical boundaries. Whether they are flushing taxpayers money down the toilet in pointless attempts to explore deep space, or tring to splice a few greyhound genes into an athelete, they cannot tell right from wrong.

Contact The Daily Stirrer





Scientists create human-sheep chimera with hopes of affordable organ transplants

A team of scientists has grown hybrid embryos in the womb of a sheep that contain human stem cells, moving the sci-fi idea of developing human organs inside animals one step closer to reality, and sparking ethical concerns.

The development could potentially save thousands lives among people who are in a need of vital organ transplants. Many patients die before they reach to the top of a queue, but scientists have long claimed organs like a pancreas for example, grown inside a pig, sheep or some other animal, could possibly not only save a life but also cure a chronic illness such Type 1 Diabetes.

This week, the team from Stanford University announced they had grown a sheep embryo injected with adult human stem cells for 28 days, including 21 days inside a sheep mother. The news was revealed at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Austin, Texas, the Guardian reports. The experiment had to be terminated, as U.S. law forbids developing cross-species embryos, called chimera, for more than 28 days.

Researchers had already created the first human-pig hybrid. The major difference this time is they achieved a much higher ratio of human cells to animal cells in the hybrid embryo, which is one human cell to about 10,000 sheep cells, according to Dr. Pablo Ross from the University of California.

To prevent the natural abortion of the unnatural embryo and create the part-human, part-animal chimera, the researchers use a gene-editing technique. First, they deleted genes needed for developing a certain organ in an animal embryo, then they injected human stem cells to fill the void. In 2010, Japanese scientists were the first to use this method to create a mouse and rat chimera, where the rat cells were introduced into a mouse to form a missing pancreas.

Last year, the same team that is now working on a sheep embryo, announced that it had, for the most part, cured diabetes in mice after transplanting a mouse pancreas it had grown in a rat.

There’s still a long way to go until this could be possible to replicate on humans, the researchers said. Unlike the rats or mice, both sheep and pigs have organs similar in size to those of a human.

"It could take five years or it could take 10 years but I think eventually we will be able to do this," the study’s co-author Hiromitsu Nakauchi of Stanford University said.

GM babies? How About The Frankenstein Lobby Try A Bit Of Honesty And Call It Eugenics
As the British Parliament debated legalising the use of techniques to create three parent babies and the dishonest champions of scientific fascism claim is is a perfectly safe development to remove faulty genes from humanity and in no way similar to programs with the same aim carried out in Nazi Germany, we challenge them to be honest and admit what they propose is Eugenics, a morally repugnant quest to create a master race. And all three main political parties support it.

Transhumanism and Eugenics
We have said many times that the science community is at war with humanity. Scientists are out of control, evry day we hear of some new scheme to try to control nature, be it human nature or the climate. Given what we ought to have learned from all previous attempts to control nature we can only conclude that scientists are insane psychos willing to risk destroying life to show off how clever they are.
Transhumanism: Join The Resistance
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?
Transhumanism: They will get under your skin
We seem to be talking a lot about transhumanism, the process of turing us into human - animal or human -machine hybrids recently. The Daily Stirer thinks such technological visions are nothing more than the fantasies of sick minds, but politicians and corporate leaders, ever eager for more power and control, seem willing to stump up infintie funding. Technology and Transhumanism
Prof Mark Post, a researcher at the University of Maastricht, has spent several years developing a technique for growing meat in the lab. Yesterday, he unveiled the product of his work: a petri-dish beefburger, grown from stem cells. Genetically, it is beef, but it has never seen a cow. The eye-watering price tag represents the cost of the whole project (Google’s Sergey Brin was picking up the bill). The shamburger was cooked via a live video stream on the internet, and was pronounced as basically meat-like (if lacking salt and fat) by a panel of chefs, who for some reason ate it without ketchup.

Artificial Intelligence: Will It Kill Human Society?
The media, the so called 'experts' and politicians hail every technological advance as if it will btransport us from reality to a utopian paradise. but does Artificial Intelligence and related internet and computer technology pose theats to human society that far outweigh any possible advantages? Whateve, Google plan to put machines in our place on top of the food chain.

Is Technology Creating Physical and Psychological Hazards In The Digital Age?
Scientific research used to be the area of work that trailblazers, those with an unquenchable desire for new experience and a hyperactive sense of adventure wanted to be involved in. Now those who label themselves 'scientists' seem to have become the high priests of an ultra - conservative religion, determined at all costs to block progess that may lead to understanding that the dogmas of the past are just wrong

The Mummers: The Controlling system And The Illusion Of Freedom
We live in a world of deception, where truth is an ephemeral thing, slippery as an eel and shadowy as a spectre. What we are expercted to perceive as reality is just spin and misinformation designed to ensure the elite maintain their control. There's eff all you can do just get on with your life, say the shills for big government and authoritarianism. But are we really nothing more than slaves of the system?

How many Parents?
A Computer With Human Abilities
Will your brain interface with a computer
Transhumanism in Google's ambitions
Humanitas
Science and technology
Transhumanism index

daily stirrer home

Mind Control: The Attempt to Program Life

“The objectives of scientific research into modern mind control are always spoken of in terms of alleviation of mental anguish, and of healing the psychological woulds we are told we all suffer in childhood. Reflect for a moment however on what kind of people have an interest in mind control: the mad scientists whose lives are one long ego trip, an attempt to show they are so clever they can control nature, and elitist politicians whose aim is to secrure for themselves ever greater levels of control over a compliant population. So you would not expect truthful statements about an agenda that involved eugenics, population control and the suppression of individual will? The mind contrtol experiments going on now must be filed under the ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ category of Dr. Evil style science.

The premise an unsuspecting population is sold goes something like this; less thought, less self doubt, more happiness. A gift given to the essentially passive human being, the slacker, the proverbial couch popato that we are constantly told we must not become. That constant barrage of lifestyle advice is itself a version of mind control. Eccentrics and loners are replaced by the constantly obedient, programmed android. You doubt me? You think science is the way to the future and the government are on our side? Think again, a few lines from a project carried out at the renowned Massachusetts Institute Of Technology (MIT) might convince you to be less strusting of authority.

Neuroscientists reverse memories’ emotional associations

MIT study also identifies the brain circuit that links feelings to memories.
Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
August 27, 2014


Most memories have some kind of emotion associated with them: Recalling the week you just spent at the beach probably makes you feel happy, while reflecting on being bullied provokes more negative feelings.

A new study from MIT neuroscientists reveals the brain circuit that controls how memories become linked with positive or negative emotions. Furthermore, the researchers found that they could reverse the emotional association of specific memories by manipulating brain cells with optogenetics — a technique that uses light to control neuron activity.

The findings, described in the Aug. 27 issue of Nature, demonstrated that a neuronal circuit connecting the hippocampus and the amygdala plays a critical role in associating emotion with memory. This circuit could offer a target for new drugs to help treat conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, the researchers say.

“In the future, one may be able to develop methods that help people to remember positive memories more strongly than negative ones,” says Susumu Tonegawa, the Picower Professor of Biology and Neuroscience, director of the RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics at MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and senior author of the paper.

The paper’s lead authors are Roger Redondo, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute postdoc at MIT, and Joshua Kim, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Biology.

Read full report

Tinker with memory, re-program neurons, change brain chemistry; these are the hallmarks of efforts by twentieth centiry dictators such as Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Mao Tse Tung to condition human life. The 'science' is patchy to say the least, there are lots of uses of might and maybe, perhaps, possibly and in the right conditions in the report's conclusion along with the obligatory 'more research is needed, in other words it is the science of guesswork and hypothesis rather than of theory verifiable by empirical evidence, but the effort (and the amount of taxpayers' money) being put into it is enormous, and the direction is clear.

If you stacked up all the social sciences, and biology and physics and chemistry, as well as psychology and psychiatry…and even if you went out to the fringes of academia, where the so-called oddball and mavericks are to be found you would encounter scenarios about human life as an exercise in programing, as if all we are and all that we think do or say (h/t Zager and Evans) is a result of software encoded in our DNA. Yet mention to these fringe scientists, the militant atheists and Secular Humanism cult types that what they are really talking about is intelligent design (after all a program must have a programmer, right?) and they throw a hissy fit and immediately accuse you of being a young earth creationist.

And yet what they are doing is Intelligent Design. Change the protien, the molecule, the cell, the family, the environment, the DNA. Initiate new biological control systems to dictate patterns of behaviour and social organization.

The whole basis of this exercise is the belief that we humans are just biological machines, passive recipients of influences. Therefore, alter the influences.

On the low end, you have the CIA’s mind-control program, MKULTRA. At the high end, you have something like this: “the universe is taking us to an ultimate state of consciousness, and we’re cells in the super body of All Wisdom, which is gradually revealing its truth to us.”

Either way, humans are viewed as passive as another paragrapgh in the MIT paper illustrates.

Findings, described in the Aug. 27 (2014) issue of Nature, demonstrated that a neuronal circuit connecting the hippocampus and the amygdala plays a critical role in associating emotion with memory. This circuit could offer a target for new drugs to help treat conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

In the future, one may be able to develop methods that help people to remember positive memories more strongly than negative ones,':- Tonegawa, the Picower Professor of Biology and Neuroscience, director of the RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics at MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and senior author of the paper.

Controlled cause-effect, stimulus-response interfaces with the brain, no matter how basic or complex, suppression of free will and the freedom to act is what the scientists and their paymasters are aiming for. A human existence in which free thought, choice, self determination, and imagination are radically diminished.

For example: “the brain is source of consciousness.”

Consider how physics looks at the brain: it is an organ of the body, made up of the same particles that populate the rest of the universe. Nowhere, in any of those particles, is the capacity to understand meaning.

Therefore, the brain cannot understand meaning.

We are told somewhat absurdly that meaning is merely a chemical/biological/electromagnetic illusion, an ongoing “readout” to which we are passively subjected (do you get the impression these scientists watched The Matix franchise undr the impression they were watching documentaries).

Possessed of such demented view of life, scientists feel perfectly justified in experimenting and tinkering with, and changing, the “human machine.” In fact, for Dr. Ewen Cameron, the most highly regarded psychiatrist in the world during the 1940s and 50s, an individual’s personality was the property of society, represented by men such as himself. (You will find articles on the God complex that afficts many leading scientists elsewhere in this book so I'll let that one pass without comment)

Armed with such indestructible arrogance, Cameron devised a method of torture called “psychic driving,” which involved administering many powerful electric shocks to his patients’ brains, coupled with intensive drugging that put them into consecutive weeks of sleep, after which he played them tapes that repeated pat phrases millions of times—all in an effort to erase their personalities and install new ones.

Cameron worked on contract to the CIA, as a researcher in its infamous MKULTRA program.

These days, the research on programming is far more subtle, but the objective is the same. The patient would not experience overt physical pain while a particular circuit in his brain is “neutralized,” but he would never function in the same way again. He would be “new,” (or 'reconstructed' to use a term from Maoist China.

Anyone who is not familiar with the type of experiment in social and human engineering carried out under the twentieth century tyrants I mentioned above should read some good and unexpurgated histories of Nazi Germany, Soviet Russdia and Communist China, unlike the half wit scientist who recently told me I was an ignorant fool for drawing parallels between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia only proved what an ill informed shit-for-brains he is, the comparison has been made many thousands of times by historians, social scientists and political commentators.

The only way in which the twenty - first century mind meddlers differ is that without the protection of a tyrant, they have to be more guarded and subtle when describing what they are doing.

Fair Use: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

What The controllers have In Store For Your Future

If you thought the book Nineteen Eighty-four by George Orwell was something else—even possibly off the wall when written—wait until you learn what’s planned for us by the year 2025! George Orwell, in retrospect, seems to have been able to tap into some sort of future-time-machine or a “worm hole” in physics—what’s known as an “Einstein-Rosen bridge,” because much of what he wrote about has come to realization.

What The controllers have In Store For Your Future

RELATED POSTS: Transhumanism omnibus
Technology and transhumanism
Transhumanism and Eugenics
Slaves to the machine Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]... [ Ian's Authorsden Pages ]... [Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Original Boggart Blog] ... [ Authorsden blog ]

Google’s Eric Schmidt Greases Skids For Internet Brain Chip

CEO predicts end of the web as an external concept at Davos confab

from Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet

Google CEO Eric Schmidt greased the skids for an Internet brain chip during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland earlier today when he predicted the end of the world wide web as an external concept.

Asked how he saw the Internet developing in future years, Schmidt responded. “I will answer very simply that the Internet will disappear.”

“There will be so many IP addresses…so many devices, sensors, things that you are wearing, things that you are interacting with that you won’t even sense it,” he added. “It will be part of your presence all the time. Imagine you walk into a room, and the room is dynamic. And with your permission and all of that, you are interacting with the things going on in the room.”

Schmidt, who previously caused controversy amongst privacy advocates when he stated, “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place,” concluded his Davos speech by envisaging “A highly personalized, highly interactive and very, very interesting world.”

When Schmidt speaks of sensors that will replace the Internet as a platform accessed only through an external device, he is talking about implantable brain chips.

As we previously reported, in December 2013, Google engineering director Scott Huffman predicted that within five years web users would have microphones attached to their ceilings and microchips embedded in their brains in order to perform quicker internet searches.

This ubiquitous world wide web would utilize microphones to instantly answer queries, control other technological devices and make travel plans.

When asked if such a system would be more vulnerable to government surveillance, Huffman glibly responded that people should just trust Google (a company that allowed the NSA to mine data from its cloud network “at will”) to safeguard their information.

“Google believes it can ultimately fulfil people’s data needs by sending results directly to microchips implanted into its user’s brains,” states the Independent newspaper report which features the interview with Huffman.

So when Eric Schmidt talks of the Internet “disappearing,” he really means that it will disappear inside your head.

While transhumanists will see this as an exciting leap forward for the world wide web, others will be understandably alarmed at the concept of a giant transnational corporation with cosy NSA connections having microchips embedded inside its customers’ brains.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table

What The controllers have In Store For Your Future
If you thought the book Nineteen Eighty-four by George Orwell was something else—even possibly off the wall when written—wait until you learn what’s planned for us by the year 2025! George Orwell, in retrospect, seems to have been able to tap into some sort of future-time-machine or a “worm hole” in physics—what’s known as an “Einstein-Rosen bridge,” because much of what he wrote about has come to realization.

Transhumanism and the elite agenda Transhumanism: the acceptable name for eugenics Transhumanism: how Google plan to get under your skin Transhumanism: Synchronising your brain with the internet Greenteeth transhumanism index Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad




Could 'DNA editing' lead to designer babies?

posted by Igor Kreepe

Genetically engineered perfect babies, human / animal hybrids, these things have been in wet dream territory for scientists for a long time. But now due to techniques such as DNA editing, they are getting worryingly close to reality. And as has been demonstrated many times, scientists have zero uderstanding of where the ethical boundaries lie.

Designer babies, genetically modified for beauty, intelligence, athetic prowess or artistic ability have been on the agenda of the science community for a long time. For decades a favoutite theme of science fiction novels and movies, and openly discussed after the last Olympics.

Science heads showed how fucked up and lacking humanity they are by seriously proposing to negate the years of dedication, commitment, sacrifce and striving for excellence that have always been the path to becoming a champion in favour of doctoring human DNA with genes from a flea to produce prodigious high jumpers or with genes from a grayhound to get suprfast sprinters.

I think even ethically challenged types would see such monstrosities would make competition meaningless. but not the science heads. With them its all about ego, about showing they can control nature.

Well now, according to a research team at the University of Bath, doctoring DNA to produce designer babies is possible. Time for the backlash to start. If we have to fight to protect our humanity from these people, lets show them how superior natural humans are to the kind of sick scientific freaks who want to make us sub human.

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
Transhumanism and Eugenics
We have said many times that the science community is at war with humanity. Scientists are out of control, evry day we hear of some new scheme to try to control nature, be it human nature or the climate. Given what we ought to have learned from all previous attempts to control nature we can only conclude that scientists are insane psychos willing to risk destroying life to show off how clever they are.
Transhumanism: Join The Resistance
Transhumanism, the creation of - or turning us into - part human, part machine cyborgs is generating a lot of discussion and a lot of spontaneous ejaculations in the scientific community as they contemplate having their brains replaced by a computer. There are no limits on the ambitions of scientists fantasies, they even envisage creating robots that can interbreed with us, but how much is realistic?
Transhumanism: They will get under your skin
We seem to be talking a lot about transhumanism, the process of turing us into human - animal or human -machine hybrids recently. The Daily Stirer thinks such technological visions are nothing more than the fantasies of sick minds, but politicians and corporate leaders, ever eager for more power and control, seem willing to stump up infintie funding. Technology and Transhumanism
Prof Mark Post, a researcher at the University of Maastricht, has spent several years developing a technique for growing meat in the lab. Yesterday, he unveiled the product of his work: a petri-dish beefburger, grown from stem cells. Genetically, it is beef, but it has never seen a cow. The eye-watering price tag represents the cost of the whole project (Google’s Sergey Brin was picking up the bill). The shamburger was cooked via a live video stream on the internet, and was pronounced as basically meat-like (if lacking salt and fat) by a panel of chefs, who for some reason ate it without ketchup.

Artificial Intelligence: Will It Kill Human Society?
The media, the so called 'experts' and politicians hail every technological advance as if it will btransport us from reality to a utopian paradise. but does Artificial Intelligence and related internet and computer technology pose theats to human society that far outweigh any possible advantages? Whateve, Google plan to put machines in our place on top of the food chain.

Is Technology Creating Physical and Psychological Hazards In The Digital Age?
Scientific research used to be the area of work that trailblazers, those with an unquenchable desire for new experience and a hyperactive sense of adventure wanted to be involved in. Now those who label themselves 'scientists' seem to have become the high priests of an ultra - conservative religion, determined at all costs to block progess that may lead to understanding that the dogmas of the past are just wrong

The Mummers: The Controlling system And The Illusion Of Freedom
We live in a world of deception, where truth is an ephemeral thing, slippery as an eel and shadowy as a spectre. What we are expercted to perceive as reality is just spin and misinformation designed to ensure the elite maintain their control. There's eff all you can do just get on with your life, say the shills for big government and authoritarianism. But are we really nothing more than slaves of the system?

A Computer With Human Abilities
Will your brain interface with a computer
Transhumanism in Google's ambitions
Humanitas
Science and technology
Transhumanism index
Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut]





Virtual ID has arrived – why you should resist taking it up

via Boggart Blog

virtual identity - decide who you want to be then input the digital information

" (image source)

Every human being (and their dogs) in Britain is to be provided with a government-backed virtual ID to store personal data online, file tax returns and apply for driving licences through a single portal, the lead story in The Times informs us today.

Now you may hear Labour supporters and others of the authoritarian left screaming that the plan exposes the intention of The Conservatives to create a police state, do not be taken in; this is the idea floated by Labour under Blair to compel us all to BUY and electronic ID card which would replace our passport, driving licence and be the only way of accessing government services to claim benefits, seek healthcare or deal with any government department. That plan was shelved due to firce and overwhelming public opposition but at the time sceptics and dissident organisations were warning bureaucrats never abandoned a plan to extend their tyrannical reach.

And now with the Conservative led coalition facing an election in less than twelve months and the civil servants and public service unions desperatle wanting a free spending (and borrowing), personal liberty curtailing, Labour government back in power because Labour always presides over a massive increase in the size of government, we see the ID card idea back with slightly less scary window dressing. Within a year of their launch, more than half a million people are expected to start using the new "Verify” scheme to prove their identity, under a radical expansion of public services available online.

And how many years will it be before they are compulsory and beining outside one's home without an official permit is an arrestable offence (bright sparks may recall this was part of the Labour ID card scheme)

Most people don't have a clue what manner of government control over our personal liberty with personal electronic ID will pave the way for. A massive US government and corporate partnership has been developing "web ID,” a master password matching you with your online activities which the partnership hopes to sell to governments around the world. It is one gate by which all will enter. And one gate means one gatekeeper. The virtual ID is the final step into a world of global fascism. Why do you think the Obama administration in the USA has been so keen to try to subjugate nations whose governments are likely to resist its global hegemony?

The purpose of this scheme is to eventually be able to verify every single person who uses the web. You will have one master password for all of your use and transactions. It will link to your biometric ID which will include fingerprints, iris regognition facial recognition and voice patterns. The intention is that the system will track and store your every action, location and much more. Without it you will not be able to buy a radio or TV, take a flight, transact money, get a job, claim benefits, pay your bills or see your doctor. It will be a universal aggregator of your data.

And what do you think will become of your right to free speech or personal protest then? Too effing right they'll disappear, faster than a white rabbit in a magician's hat. And you too, think about it, the human you will cease to exist as far as the intitutions of state are concerned, no virtual ID, no you. Your online presence will be your only existence.

As the system rolls out it will become 'internationalised' (whatever that means, it can't be good for our personal liberty). When Virtual or Smart ID becomes mandatory as it will because there is no point in these cards unless every human being is required to use one, privacy will be gone forever.

As Edward Snowden said GCHQ is more dangerous than the NSA and without Snowden we wouldn't even be aware of the curently possible privacy breaches in the first place let alone a full-on biometric ID with all your personal data in the hands of government agencies. They will use it to control you, abuse it to rob you of your human rights and sell it to corporate interests so they may more easily steal from you. People are individuals not assets to be exploited and controlled, which is what this latest corporate - bureaucratic fascist abomination is about.


RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
The Death Of Democracy
Computer brain Interface - Is this what's next

The corporate fascism conspiracy
Government control versus individual freedom
Elitist plan global takeover
Free trade treaty nothing to do with freedom
Transhumanism part of the elite agenda
Technology and the Orwell - Huxley Dick Dystopia Index
Creating the technology for mind control
Cellphone fascism, the extension of surveillance through personal technology
Surveillance: compulsory rfid tattoos
Surveillance the tool of totalitarian states
The Panopticon: The arrival of the prison state Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut]



Transhumanism - the fascist dictator's wet dream

by Ian R Thorpe

I didn't write this myself but I though it important enough to be speard around - and I have posted a lot on transhumanism and the psychotic insanity of modern scientists recently. You may be surprised to find such an article on a site names farm wars, but farmers know that the intensive cultivation techniques being developed by scientists for Big Ag Corporations are producing nutritionally depleted food.

Reinventing Humanity: That all-consuming quest for the key to eternal life.

Barbara H. Peterson -Farm Wars

Science will control our shapes, our intelligence, even create new breeds of men – violent men to fight our wars, docile men to do our work – hell on earth. (Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde)

Synthetic food, synthetic voice, synthetic body, synthetic memory, synthetic brain, synthetic everything. That is what we are headed for at an increasingly accelerated rate. We are losing our humanity minute by minute and replacing it with technology. This is not an accident. No, it is quite intentional. We are being programmed to accept the theory that technology is somehow better than nature, and that those who use it are superior to those who don't, when in actuality, we are becoming hopelessly dependent on it.

There is nothing wrong with technology when it is used as a tool for accomplishing worthy goals. However, there is a big difference between using it in a positive, beneficial way, and as a manipulative tool to create terminal dependence as a way of life.

When you become dependent on the machine, those who own the machine own you.

We are increasingly using unnatural means to achieve "real” sounding and "real” looking artificial constructs to replace what nature has provided. Take for example, Auto-Tune technology. This is used to make singers sound on key when in reality they are taking a shortcut to what normally takes talent and years of practice. We have now replaced true human excellence in art with a microwave version of computerized sounds made to appear as human.

In January of 2010, Kesha Sebert, known as ‘Ke$ha' debuted at number one on Billboard with her album, Animal. Her style is electro pop-y dance music: she alternates between rapping and singing, the choruses of her songs are typically melodic party hooks that bore deep into your brain: "Your love, your love, your love, is my drug!” And at times, her voice is so heavily processed that it sounds like a cross between a girl and a synthesizer. Much of her sound is due to the pitch correction software, Auto-Tune. LINK

This is the society of the future – Auto-Tuned, genetically manipulated, and living in a fantasy world. Not to worry if you can't do something as good as the next person, or aren't as physically attractive. Just add this enhancement and that enhancement and in less than the time it takes to say "hey, I want that too,” you will be just as good as the person who has worked for years to perfect his/her talent, nothing required but the bucks to buy the technology. An instant, microwave solution to life.

Read all of this long but informative artice at Farm News

Um - Ke$ha? Isn't she the one with a haunted vagina? (Jenny G, Editor - in -Chief)
RELATED POSTS:
The Robotification Of Human Society Is being Implemented
Resisting Transhumanism
The technology of mind control
Your robot fuck buddy
Slaves to the machine


What Have We Told You About Mad Scientists And The God Complex

DARPA Trying to Create New Life, Attempt Immortality.

indestructible battle cyborg
Indestructible Battle Cyborg (
source)

Those people of accuse me of being "anti-science" need to read this. I am not anti - science (science means knowledge so it is not possible to be anti - science. What I am anti is lunacy, giving psychopaths power and wasting taxpayers money - and if that means some twat kills himself because what I write makes him realise he will never walk on Mars or explore distant galaxies, well so what? The world needs less arseholes.)

Yes sci-fi writers hard up for new material should spend an hour or so perusing the Defense Department?s 2015 budget proposal, especially the section covering the far-out research projects underway at DARPA, where the agency?s mad scientists are working to develop brain-controlled drones, biowarfare, engineer new life forms, and possibly attempt immortality.

If last year was the year of battlefield robots, cyborg soldiers, and weaponized drones, it looks like the next couple years will see the Pentagon gearing up for a deep dive into biotech. DARPA announced today it now has an unit devoted to studying the intersection of biology and engineering, the Biological Technologies Office. The agency is betting that the next generation of defense tech will be take a cue from natural life, and as such one of the major focuses of the new unit will be on synthetic biology. It?ll ramp up research into manufacturing biomaterials, turning living cells, proteins, and DNA into a sort of genetic factory.

Continue reading:

UPDATE 6 April, 2014

via News Beacon Ireland:

Irish launch of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots
Irish School of Ecumenics -Loyola Institute building (facing rubgy pitch)
Trinity College Dublin
April 10th 2014, 7pm

Speaker:
Noel Sharkey

Emeritus Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and Professor of Public Engagement in the University of Sheffield and Chairman of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control

All welcome
About the Stop Killer Robots Campaign:

Over the past decade, the expanded use of unmanned armed vehicles has dramatically changed warfare, bringing new humanitarian and legal challenges. Now rapid advances in technology are resulting in efforts to develop fully autonomous weapons. These robotic weapons would be able to choose and fire on targets on their own, without any human intervention, raising numerous ethical, legal, moral, policy, technical, and other concerns with fully autonomous weapons. Giving machines the power to decide who lives and dies on the battlefield is an unacceptable application of technology. The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is an international coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working to ban fully autonomous weapons.

Organised by Afri in association with the International Peace Studies Programme, Irish School of Ecumenics, Trinity College Dublin

See facebook event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/1421977561392328/

RELATED POSTS:
Robot soldiers
Orwell Huxley Dick Dystopianometer
Mind Control Technology
Transhumanism, merging men with machines