Xavier Connolly

Rupert Myers is a Conservative, he was Deputy Chairman of the Bermondsey & Old Southwark Conservative Association. Whilst I can imagine these statements coming from "New Labourites", Blairites - recalling "Blair's Babes" - the army of female MPs parachuted into mostly safe seats regardless of merit, by Tony Blair using "positive discrimination" in favour of women and against men - I am staggered at the idea a British white male Conservative now believes staunchly in the idea that there is some reason for calling a British political party leadership contest of any party "a crying shame" just because it happens to have only two white males in it.

Which shows what the real disaster that has overtaken British life and politics and the Western world in general is, and it is of course, the F word, "feminism", and as an ardent feminist and close disciple of Harriet Harman, Yvette Cooper refuses to drop out of the Labour party leadership contest, because she simply refuses to accept the majority of the Labour party supporters want a man to lead them - either Mr Corbyn or Mr Burnham, and mostly clearly Mr Corbyn - and not only a man, but a white man, and my god, it seems apparently worst of all, a relatively old white man, and one who even dares to wear a beard.

Just look back at our British history, before the modern post Second World War era, of which Conservatives supposedly are proud, and it is totally dominated by white men with beards.

Not everything was good or right in those days of course, but on the whole there was order, there was a system that worked, a system in which men and women largely cooperated, knew their roles in life, and on the whole proudly and at least somewhat virtuously tried to carry them out - i.e. men had "the dignity of labour", were proud protectors and providers for wife and family, and women were proud keepers of home and carers for their children, and generally speaking in a full time utterly dedicated way.

And this awful disaster, feminism - as opposed from the legitimate cause of women's rights and freedom to e.g. not be forcibly married or made to suffer endless pregnancies against one's wishes to the ridiculous current demands that a man has to obtain written consent from his wife in order to have sex with her, has destroyed the basic framework of society in which men and women mostly lived in harmony, and children were mostly properly cared for, whereas now neither of those things are true.

For feminism demands women must have jobs, and in particular, the top jobs and positions of power, for no other good reason than simply because they are women.

And since women got the vote, it was not equality as stated, it was an immediately unequal and superior position in favour of women, because of the long term fact that women live longer than men, there are always more women than men, currently over 1 million more in the over 60s group alone than men, so there are always in modern times at least 1 million more women voters than men in the UK.

And I haven't been able to find any figures, but I suspect a lot more women nowadays actually vote than men, with the effect that every modern political party has to chase the women's vote - they have to do whatever women want, promise what women want - so all we are hearing about all the time is women's issues - more jobs for women, more nurseries and childcare for women to neglect their children in while they go to work in most cases wholly unnecessarily, at the expense of the psychological and indeed even early years educational development of their children, and indeed their husbands/partners also, who are burdened with childcare and other duties as well as typically holding down a more demanding and usually higher paid too job than the women they are married/partnered too.

This of course has numerous other damaging effects on our society - typically for example we are finding middle class families in which both parents work, and then we've got single people and lower class people who can't find jobs at all, because the working mothers are taking them, and not just a few, but by the millions.

Thus, the feminists and their testosterone starved male supporters have taken over every major political party - they are now demanding more women in every position of power, for no other reason than they are women, and Mr Johnson ought to be aware that they'll be demanding a woman Lord Mayor of London next, so his days will be numbered if they get their way, as right now they almost always do.

And a little digging into their tactics will show in many cases they are totally ruthless in trying to take men's jobs off them - they will create hate campaigns even based on lies, and demand e.g. convicted rapists (and very dubiously so to in the view even of the DT's Allison Pearson) like footballer Ched Evans, cannot be allowed to have top well paid jobs any more, despite serving their prison sentences.

Fortunately, even though there are more women voters than men, most women are not actually particularly feminist, and thus even the Labour party supporters - as opposed to the near totally feminist and feminised parliamentary party - are voting mostly for two men, and clearly for one man in particular.

Thus in fact, the feminists do not really represent most women, they only claim to, and thus should their demands not be constantly given in to, as is currently happening, not only in politics, but in the media also, with for example nearly all the women writers for the DT being one shade or another of ranting feminists.

The Conservative men are sleepwalking into their own self-made destruction, and the dubious convictions of many high ranking or celebrity men - and they are far from finished yet, the zealot feminist DPP, Allison Saunders, and her team are compiling more lists of men to be tried for "historical" (in my view mainly hysterical and false) claims of sex abuse, with of course ex-Conservative PM Ted Heath now being in the firing line, and we've seen they will not even stop at royalty, with attempts to bring even Prince Andrew down with under age sex allegations.

Conservative men have got to learn to start saying a very firm NO to the feminists.

Really, this is more important for all our lives than who wins the Labour leadership election, because what the feminists are doing and continue to do is undermine the security and freedom, and particularly independence of thought and action of the British people, and in particular the traditional family and its men.

And what we find in a society in which the authority of men and good non feminist women is replaced by that of feminists, is that our children fall into serious confusion.

And thus do we have a nation of children who are growing up very out of control and confused in almost every way, and thus increasingly subject to (feminist dominated) psychiatry and therapy, and put on drugs at an early age and so on, and worst of all, a large group of young males, not properly socialised or sociable (feminist nurseries don't teach them how to respect and relate to other people, devoted and good parents do that), who are all becoming drug or porn or violent video game addicts, not able to fit into society well, and frequently disruptive in all kinds of ways, on account of them not having fathers, and not growing up in a happy, secure and orderly environment, as they at least approximately did in former times in most cases.

Whether Jeremy Corbyn gets elected leader of the Labour party or not, is really the least of our problems as a nation.

However what Jeremy Corbyn represents, or indeed Andy Burnham, is the beginning of taking the Labour party back from the feminists, who for example during the Blair era created a crime of "marital rape", which had apparently not been needed to exist in recorded history before - there is little or no real justification for women to refuse sex to a man whom they have pledged vows of lifelong love and devotion ( and formerly obedience too) towards in a marriage ceremony, and divorce has long been available to women who feel they are seriously mistreated - thus introducing a 3rd party into the marriage or relationship between men and women and their children - the busybody interfering state in the form of the social worker armed with court orders and police, and ready to kick men out of families for trying to teach their children respect, and take away people's children whose parents in their view aren't behaving according to their demented "political correctness" rules.

Feminists do not have any real power, no genuine support of the majority of the people, except when they are allowed to keep putting their own puppets into positions of power, which we almost always find therefore is totally regardless of democracy - such as even how Peter Mandelson became a Minister in Gordon Brown's last government, without even being elected by the public as an MP at the time, and for quite some time also I suspect, having been forced to resign several times already during Mr Blair's administration.

Mr Corbyn is really therefore taking back the Labour party for real socialists as opposed to feminists, and I suggest the Conservative and Liberal parties do the same - I see the appointment of a devout Christian to Lib Dem leadership as at least a small good sign - and root out these foolish feminists - including feminist doormat Mr Cameron himself, who must apparently do his share of "baby bath duty" - you know, as if being Prime Minister of Great Britain is not a busy enough job, it's just no excuse if he has to attend an urgent war cabinet meeting or something apparently - get that baby bathed now! - and perhaps replace him with someone not a feminist doormat, like perhaps David Davies.

All our world is at heart, regardless of political persuasion, is a collection of families.

And the feminists have attacked the traditional stable and secure two parent family and thus the traditional roles of men and women in a near mortally injurious way, and thus stopping this destruction is far bigger a matter than any political leadership contest, as important however as that currently is, mainly because it will in due course disempower the feminists, whom you see, like Yvette Cooper, will not therefore back down, because their goal is to seize ultimate power for feminist women like themselves, and you can rest assured men will be treated worse than dogs - we're most of the way there already - if they ever achieve that ultimate power.

RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
The left's authoritarian tide
Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ] ... [ Ian at Minds ] ... [ The Origninal Boggart Blog]