the daily stirrer

Greenteth Digital Publishing

The Daily Stirrer

After several years publishing Greenteeth Labyrinth and The Daily Stirrer we decided a better way than random searched on search engines was needed to open up our archive material, so we included these menu pages, on which we gather headlines and links for posts on a particular topic. If you want to narrow your research further enter one or more keywords in the site search tool, top of the right hand navigation bar

Privacy policy: We don't track you or gather personal info, we do not sell data, we don't use cookies. End of. Enjoy our website.

Covid Vaccine Refusers 'Thrive On Attention' Says Prime Attention Seeker And Chief Clown Boris Johnson

Politicians who criticised AstraZeneca vaccine 'probably killed hundreds of thousands', says Oxford scientist in an outburst that reveals how the science acedemy have been totally owned by corporate money and thus have been guilty of lying, scaremongering, fabricating evidence, publishing fake statisics and spreadsing misinformation. And the politicians who told us to 'trust The Science' are just as guilty


Greenteeth Digital Publishing
the daily stirrer

8 February 2022

Politicians who criticised AstraZeneca vaccine 'probably killed hundreds of thousands', says Oxford scientist

Oxford professor has said Sir John Bell said critical comments from leaders, scientists and politicians who expressed critical views of the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine “probably killed hundreds of thousands of people”. It is a ridiculous comment of course, but typical of what we have come to expect from vaccine authoritarianism propagandists

Professor Bell complained that influential figures including French president Emmanuel Macron, had “damaged the reputation of the jab” around the world, resulting in less people accessing the life-saving vaccine.

Bell was speaking in a BBC documentary "AstraZeneca: A Vaccine for the World?," which will be broadcast on Tuesday 8th February at 9pm, said: “I think bad behaviour from scientists and politicians has probably killed hundreds of thousands of people – and that they cannot be proud of.”

In other words Professor Bell, who according to an article in the British Medical Journal has financial and professional links with Astra Zeneca believes anyone who does not agree with him should not be alowed to comment on this issue. So the carping of this science whore can be dismissed as just another case of 'He would say that, wouldn't he?'

In 2021 France'sMacron claimed that the vaccine “doesn’t work as expected” and appeared to be “quasi-ineffective” in the over-65s.

Hours before the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the AstraZeneca jab for use in the bloc, Macron slammed the AZ jab and criticised the UK’s decision to administer vaccine doses 12 weeks apart, claiming it could “accelerate the mutations” of the virus.

Other EU countries, including Germany, Spain and Italy, also temporarily suspended use of the AstraZeneca jab last year when it was linked to a risk of blood clots. In response to that evidence the science whores (i.e. those who get funding from corporations and organisations with financial or political interests in mass vaccination campaigns,) closed ranks around the vacine, dismissing the risk as not statistically significant. Independent research tells a different story however.


French president Emmanuel Macron gestures as he speaks to staff working in the intensive care ward of the Poissy/Saint-Germain-en-Laye hospital, near Paris, with French Health Minister Olivier Veran, right, and Chief of Intensive Care Unit Dr. Jan Hayon in March 2021 Credit: Yoan Valat/EPA POOL

In all such discussions on COVID and the vaccines which were hyped as The Messiah that would save humanity from certain extinction it should be remembered that the vast majority of people who died in the pandemic and whose deaths could be linked to covid were over the age of 80 and / or had pre - existing long term health conditions. We should also remember that in the past any new drug or vaccine would be withdrawn on safety grounds if just 50 deaths worldwide could be linked to it (not conclusively PROVED to be cause by the vaccine, but merely a possible link suspected.) To date more that 1000 times that number of deaths have occurred that could possibly be linked to the vaccines.

The truth about the COVID scare mass vaccination scam is thus:
Scientifically illiterate Politicians, with their hidden agendas, advocated a mass gene therapy trail, with neither informed consent, nor proper Parliamentary scrutiny, resulting in hundreds of thousands of vaccine injuries and thousands of deaths.

In October 2020, Kate Bingham expressed the scientific consensus when she said: "Less than half the UK population can expect to be vaccinated against coronavirus... vaccinating everyone in the country is not going to happen, we just need to vaccinate everyone at risk.”

Two months later - after psychopathic genius in a Big Pharma corporate merketing department invented the killer marketing line: "No-one's safe until everyone's safe" - that objective changed to vaccinating everyone over the age of five three or more times. And now the billionaire psychopaths of the Big Pharma cartel who earn their $£€1,000,000 plus bonuses according to how many drugs they sell rather than how many lives they preserve are pushing idiots like 'Dementia Joe' Biden, BoJo The Clown Johnson, Granny - molester Macron and the invisible kraut who is supposedly in chage of Germany for babies to be given the untesed, experimental clotshots within a few days of birth. Corrupt does not being to describle they way these people operate.

The science hadn't changed, the safety of COVID vaccines is still suspect but the propaganda has. You have to get vaccinated 'for the greater good' even if in real terms you are at zero risk from COVID. Trust the scientists, follow the science the propaganda tels us day after day. But you cannot trust the science if you cannot trust the scientists; and you cannot trust the scientists when their advice is so disconnected from the science.

None of the vaccines are approved, they were rushed through development and skiiped most of the usual testing porogram, being made available by their governments granting temporary approvak for emergency use only. Governments and the World Health Organisation (WHO) granted immunity from prosecution for any harm their vaccines might cause. This alone should have been enough to warn 90% of people to stay away from the vaccines but so intense was the propaganda campaign and so extreme were the threats and coercive measures used to pressure sceptics that about two thirds of the populations in developed nations accepted vaccination regardless of the possible long and short term consequences.

Temporary authorisation is not the same thing as approval. A trained first - aider might be given temporary authorisation to perform an emergency tracheotomy with a penknife and a drinking straw on someone choking in a restaurant, but it would not qualify that person as a surgeon. And temporary approval was given for two doses of vaccine. Once it bacame clear that the very limited immuity provided by the vaccines wears off after a few weeks, the manufacturers and health authorities began to push for mandatory booster shorts every few months.

The clinical trials of these vaccines were conducted with two doses. None were conducted with three or four doses. None were conducted with mixed vaccines. None were conducted with babies, toddlers, children, or pregnant women.

We should take all this into account when being coerced by our governments and maindstream media into being part of what is effectively a clinical trial for Pfizer, AZ et al. None of these companies will be accountable for any harm that might arise.

And we should also question why there has been such a panic about this not - very - deadly disease. It is claimed COVID has been responsible for hundreds of thousands dead in nations of over 50 million such as UK, France, Italy? So have Cancer, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Smoking, Seasonal Influenza, and yet we do liitle about it. We don't pour millions, if not billions of pounds into these developing vaccines that do not immunise against such killers or lockdown entire nations doing irreparirable damage to economies and social structures. We do not order people to stay in their homes, refrain from socialising, abandon sick and elderly relatives to the tender mercies of hospitals or care homes, keep children away from their lessons and their friends. The scientific case for the inefective responses to this hoax pandemic is completely unsubstantiated drivel just as the mainstream reporting of the pandemic has been.

The lesson to be learned from all this is politicians and their hand-picked scientific advisors, vested interests and unaccountable bureaucratic groups should not be in total control of the critically independent institution of scientific endeavour -- medical, environmental or technological.

It is too easy for them to prevent public understanding of lack of certainty, exclude evidence contradicting the narrative from the public domain, de-fund research grants for projects not supporting the political agendas of the ruling elites and basically to use propaganda to sugggest something is proven when it is not, especially if that something has support from computer models.

Beginning with Neil (Professor Pantsdown) Ferguson's '550,000 dead in the first wave' computer modelling of disaster, our lockdowns have been driven by an exaggeration of what might happen rather than observing and reacting to what was happening. The Johns Hopkins research sadly lays this out clearly and all its awful effects.

Infinitely more permanently harmful to our society is the global warming emergency which exists nowhere but on computer models, which has led governments in The UK, USA and main European nations to destroy working energy systems in the name of saving the plant and trapped us in a dangerous spiral of decline while Russia ramps up the proices of its oil and gas on which Europe is now dependent, while China, where there are few concerns about polluting the environment eargerly provides the manufacturing capacity that traditional manufacturing nations have made unviable because of regulations and 'green' taxes.