The Conspiracy Theorists' Revenge - When The Theories Are
Proved
Contents
Government, Banks and Big Business Collaborating To Abolish Cash And Switch Us To Electronic Money
"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
World Domination Freak Bill Gates Appeals For World Government
Was Obama Presidency The Greatest Conspiracy Ever?
When the meteoric rise of Barack Husein Obama, from novice senator for the notoriously corrupt and occasionally criminal US state of Illinois began, most people's reaction was Barack who?
A little way into the primaries campaign for the Democratic Party nomination, more serious questions were being asked. Why is a foreigner being allowed to run for President? was one. According to Obama himself, he was born in Kenya to a Kenyan father and an Amercan mother. Though he backed off both claims during the campaign, by that time his words, both spoken and written were matter of public record.
It was entirely possible of course that both claims were a disingenuous attempt by the privately educated posh boy from Hawaii, gandson of a bank vice president and son of a civil servant in the diplomatic service (later a bank executive like her mother,) though claiming a direct paternal link with 'Afreekaa' would earn him some kudos with the poor, black voters in the industrial cities of illinois. It may have done that but it raise a constiutional issue. The US constitution states that only a 'natural born citizen' of the U.S.A. can become president. But wht is a natural born citizen?
Some said to be a natural born citizen of any nation, one must be born withing a nation or one of it's directly administered overseas territories (which woud include embassies,) to parents both of whom were born on that nation. So surely Barack Obama had disqualified himself? Not so, said others, when the constitution said 'natural born citizen' it did not mean a citizen born within the country to parents who were both citizens, it meant - erm - something else. but nobody could quite be sure what, so Obama's supporters decided the questions were just a conspiracy among far right nutters and young earth creationists to prevent a black man being present.
And thus began probably the second greatest conspiracy theory debate of modern times (only bettered by the "Who really killed John F Kennedy" debate.
Two years after Obama stepped down at the end of his second term of office, to be replaced in The Whte House by an even more unlikely president, brash, loudmouthed businessman Donald Trump, the arguments still rage because if even one tenth of the allegations made by critics of Obama are true, the abuse of democracy will have massive repercussions for the democatic world for decades to come. As I have said before, it is a sad day for democracy when we must look to despots like Vladimir Putin of Russia and Chairman Xi of China to defend our liberties from global corpoprations and their political lackeys.
Obama Was Hand-Picked, NOT a Natural Born Citizen, Congress Knew & Tried to Protect Him
by Dean Garrison for Freedom Outpost
Barack Obama was hand-picked to be President. Some members of Congress, on both sides, understood that Obama was not “natural born” and tried to pass laws to pave the way for his arrival. In the end, they used a deflection tactic to shine light on John McCain’s eligibility status, hoping that Obama’s own status would not be brought into question.
Let’s kick a dead horse. The debate is settled and the damage is done. But who thinks Obama was eligible to be president?
Even President Donald Trump questioned Obama’s citizenship in 2014 by offering $50 Million to see his college records, but Obama never responded to his offer. Nothing has been done to this point.
And sadly, nothing ever will.
Let me show you today how Congress protected him from both sides of the aisle and guaranteed the debate would never go too far.
In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President.
Why is that important?
Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record.
READ ALL >>>Conspiracy Theorists Vindicated: HAARP Confirmed Weather-manipulation Tool
Catherine J. Frompovich, Activist Post
The most damning aspersion that can be lobbed against any person, or the exposure of “secret government activity,” overwhelmingly is “Conspiracy Theorist.” That pejorative ‘handle’ is equated with imbecile mind-activity with aspersions often suggested as ‘tin hat wearers’. Well, step aside all you doubters and listen up carefully to what took place in the halls of Congress on May 14, 2014 regarding the weather modification system known as HAARP.
In the YouTube below Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) asks some pointed questions about HAARP. However, readers may not be surprised at the answers, but the mainstream media ought to be wiping oodles of egg yolk from its collective face.
RELATED POSTS:
Back to Contents table
HAARP - weather control
Geoengineering with HAARP
Conspiracy Confirmed: HAARP is a weather modification tool
Something Strange In Antarctica
Geoengineeering means shite weather can be guaranteed.
Latest Posts
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ] ... Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] ... [ Tumblr ]
Government, Banks and Big Business Collaborating To Abolish Cash And Switch Us To Electronic Money
by Phil T Looker, Finance Editor
The powers that be are pushing for a cashless society although some of the technology involved is hardly fit for purpose. But will going cashless and totally digital really be a benign move towards a safer, more convenient world, or will it amount to a monstrous invasion of privacy and a curtailment of personal liberty?
Back In 1971 Libertarians Were Predicting Debit Cards Would Become A Spy Tool For Authoritarian Governments
An article on the cashless society our political and corporate overlords are pushing for proposes that as far as privacy and individual liberty are concerned, what is being planned right now in the political capitals and financial centres of the world is the worst case scenarion. An all digital financial system would mean the end of privacy, nothing you bought or traded would be your own business any more ...
Prepare For The Worst Case Scenario
Economist Martin Armstrong claims there is a "secret meeting to end cash" set to take place in London before the end of the month involving representatives from the ECB and the Federal Reserve. Armstrong, who is known for successfully predicting the 1987 Black Monday crash as well as the 1998 Russian financial collapse, expressed his shock that no news outlet has reported on this upcoming conference.
Secret Meeting in London to 'End Cash'
"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar
by Xavier Connolly
Of all the 'conspiracies' (or scams as we prefer to call them) we have ever or will ever report, the climate change fairy story is the biggest.
It is now, as of this month, eighteen years and four months since a year on year global increase in average temperature was recorded and eight years and 11 months since Warmageddonist author Mark Lynas called for international criminal tribunals before which people guilty of being accused of "Climate Denial" (has anyone ever denied the climate?) would be subjected to show trials, found guiklty of being accused and sentened to death by cruel and unusual medieval tortures (OK I may be exaggerating a bit but you get the idea. And if you don't, you will after reading the next few paragraphs
"I put [their climate change denial] in a similar moral category to Holocaust denial – except that this time the Holocaust is yet to come, and we still have time to avoid it. Those who try to ensure we don't will one day have to answer for their crimes,” bleated the self rightous Lynas.
It is now two years and six months since Professor Richard Parncutt demanded that "climate change deniers" should be executed, writing: "In this article I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW deniers.
"I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases. […] Even mass murderers should not be executed, in my opinion. […] GW deniers fall into a completely different category.
"I don't want to be a saint. I would just like my grandchildren and great grandchildren, and the human race in general, to enjoy the world that I have enjoyed, as much as I have enjoyed it. And to achieve that goal I think it is justified for a few heads to roll.”
But the Arctic ice cap, which we were told would disappear by 2011 is expanding rather quickly, Polar Bears, which we have been told were on the verge of extinction, are actually increasing in number and mistaking climate scientists sent to hassle them for free lunches courtesy of the Warmageddonist lobby. We were told that by 2013 there would be 50 million refugess, displaced from their homes by rising sea levels as melting ice caps flooded low lying areas. So far no refugees displaced due to global warming have been reported.
Global temperature shows no signs of warming, so advocates of man made global warming show no signs of thinking that perhaps, just maybe, those with a different opinion ought to be allowed to live, let alone be free to express their opinion.
The latest example of climate fascism comes from Adam Weinstein, writer and self styled "poet laureate” at the Gawker online magazine . This clown has now joined the chorus, suggesting that climate change "liars” ought to be arrested and punished (h/t WUWT).
"Let's make a clear distinction here, the self righteous Weinstein bleats, "I'm not talking about the man on the street who thinks Rush Limbaugh (a right wing radio shock jock) is right, and climate change is a socialist United Nations conspiracy foisted by a Muslim U.S. president on an unwitting public to erode its civil liberties,” he says.
"You all know that man. That man is an idiot. He is too stupid to do anything other than choke the earth's atmosphere a little more with his Mr. Pibb burps and his F-150's gassy exhaust. Few of us believers in climate change can do much more—or less—than he can."
(Here Weinstein shows up what a repugnant, snobbish, superior, consescening, partonizing arsehole he is, he despises the man on the street, on whom he looks down from his ivory tower.
He continues, "Nor am I talking about simple skeptics, particularly the scientists who must constantly hypo-test our existing assumptions about the world in order to check their accuracy. That is part and parcel of the important public policy discussion about what we do next.”
No, Mr Weinstein says he is talking about "Rush and his multi-million-dollar ilk in the disinformation business,” rich people, presumably men, who use their power and wealth to "deny people the tools they need to inform themselves, to protect themselves against a scientifically proven threat to life and limb,” because they (the deniers) "have their heads jammed in the sand… or in a barrel of money.”
In other words anyone who disagrees with Mr. Weinstein's opinion is an idiot. Well that attitude is about par for the course among American 'liberal' fascists.
Those people who do hold a differing opinion, Weinstein would like to see arrested, punished, and stopped. "Those denialists should face jail. They should face fines. They should face lawsuits from the classes of people whose lives and livelihoods are most threatened by denialist tactics,” he insists.
And so we see yet another 'liberal' intellectual return to the causus belli of modern liberal fascist, the urgent need to abolish free speech.
He bases his calls for fascistic action against global warming sceptics on a claim by the World Health Organisation that 150,000 people a year die thanks to climate change. But Eric Worrall, writing at Watts Up With That replies that the claim does not stand up to scrutiny.
Worrall draws attention to the fact that even the UN's International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which began to pump out the climate scaremongering back in 1990, "has failed to establish a link between CO2 and extreme weather.”
Moreover, it is a well established biological fact that Carbon Dioxide is essential to the growth of vegitation, through the process of photosynthesis plants absorb energy from the sun and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into tissue, outputting oxygen as a bonus.
I an always surprised as the number of people claiming to be 'scientists' in internet comment threads who appear to be blissfully unaware of this bascic biology lessoon. Perhaps they are all mathematicians and believe the universe and everything in it is made out of numbers and equations. Well mathematics is not a real science and people who believe the universe is made out of numbers are as deluded as the young earth creationists they despise.
The increases in CO2 that have taken place since the commencement of the Industrial revolution have actually been beneficial to the human inhabitants of earth. Crop yields have risen and satellites have recorded a greening of the planet in the region of 1.5 percent a year thanks to the fertilisation effect of higher CO2 levels.
Vancouver Sun Interview With Award winning Physicist and Climate Change Sceptiv Freeman Dyson
Anti-Science – The Church Of Scienceology's Latest Pejorative Term For People Who Think And Question.
We are not the only web site to take exception to accusations of being anti - science and all the other pejorative terms used by the Church Of Scienceology disciples to deflect criticism from independent minded people who are smart enough to ask Cui Bono? Which corporate business benefits.
IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are stated to amount to £77 billion a year.
World Domination Freak Bill Gates Appeals For World Government
In a recent interview with the German magazine "Süddeutsche Zeitung", Bill Gates, son of a CIA director and the New World Order's 'made man' uttered some highly sinister comments in support of abolishing democracy and nationhood in favour of world government.
Now those of us in the know have never been puzzled about how Gate's, a college drop out with no qualifications, no programming skills and no work experience managed to start a successsful software company that was selected to bid for a contract to supply the operating system for the IBM / Intel PC, which was backed by the US Government to become the de facto standard for personal computers and how, having failed to develop an acceptable system, won the contract with a DR DOS clone they bought in from another software house (all of this is documented history).
Nor is it a mystery how, having managed to impose the 'not fit for purpose' Windows, the successor of MS DOS, on the world as a near monopoly operating system for business and personal computing, Gates was thrust into a position of wielding enormous political influence on matters of global importance, without ever having been elected to anything, or having dome anything of note without the help of the US Government.
And now he is cheerleading for a global totalitarian government.
Not only did Gates advocate global government, but he also spoke favorably of the UN and NATO, completely overlooking the facts that these organisations are a major force of oppression in the world. NATO can't even hold a meeting without thousands of people gathering in the streets to protest their actions. Someone as heavily involved in world affairs as Bill Gates should know all about this.
Well he does of course, or at least his puppet master do. Unfortunately those people think Gates is popular and widely admired. Really nobody likes or trusts him.
During the interview last month, Gates said, "Take the UN, it has been created especially for the security in the world. We are ready for war, because we have taken every precaution. We have NATO, we have divisions, jeeps, trained people. But what is with epidemics? How many doctors do we have as much planes, tents, what scientists? If there were such a thing as a world government, we would be better prepared."
Not long ago the subject of global government, the so caled New World order was considered a total conspiracy theory, but now one of the richest and most influential people in the world is openly suggesting that this is a good idea. Governments are generally a pretty bad idea, even when they are small they can still do enormous amounts of damage. So when a government rules the entire planet, there is no telling what type of atrocity a world government will be capable of.
RELATED POSTS:The American Political System Is "Not A Democracy Or Constitutional Republic" - Thiel
When Algorithms Rule
Microsoft Big Brother Agenda
IBM plan to build smarter than human computers
When Technology Rules You
Technology is becoming a monster we cannot control
Elsewhere:
[Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [ Boggart Abroad] ... [ Grenteeth Bites ]
KEYWORDS: news, opinion, dailystirrer,
|